Mafiascum.net

Did spring admit to lie about the 1 xp upgrade?

I think she cleared up that she meant that she needed one more xp than she already had, not that she needed only 1 xp. And that's what I understood in the first place so what momo did was scummy lol

Sorry guys, feeling very apathetic right now. I'll try to check in tomorrow and do some work.

@Ame

In post 1334, Knightmare491 wrote:Would still like to know why you found mastina scummy(I think that's what you mean to say), for my sanity.

In post 1390, Knightmare491 wrote:

In post 1369, Ame wrote:I trust mastina accurately identified town Ginnie regardless of mastina's alignment.

Explain?

In post 1369, Ame wrote:He not realizing that Knight was the mastina replacement, town reading mastina, yet scum reading Knight for his vote in the quest also came off as super genuine

It was a mistake, I agree it felt genuine. Why is it AI?

~There was nothing scummy about mastinas play. It's an associative read which I'll go into later.
~This was odd to ask considering the answer is a few posts below the quote. Did you just not read me interaction with Raya?
~It's AI because scum are more self conscious about making mistakes.

Knight, why are you waisting your time on me instead of trying to find scum? Also, tell Farkset I say hi.

In post 1530, Ame wrote:Knight, why are you waisting your time on me instead of trying to find scum? Also, tell Farkset I say hi.

Why is asking something I didn't understand wasting time?
Okay, anything else you want me to tell him?

how is being genuine not AI lmfao

because I've seen scum make mistakes because they didn't read something. It doesn't say anything about alignment. Mistakes can be made by both.

In post 1533, Knightmare491 wrote:because I've seen scum make mistakes because they didn't read something. It doesn't say anything about alignment. Mistakes can be made by both.

well this has never happened ever in the history of mafia so we dont have to worry about that

In post 1531, Knightmare491 wrote:Why is asking something I didn't understand wasting time?

The essential part of that is why are you not scum hunting?

Also (2) how have my answers helped you? (3) Did you not read my exchange with Raya below the post you quoted? (4) Have you fully caught up? (5) What do you make of Creature's catchup?

In post 1535, Ame wrote:

In post 1531, Knightmare491 wrote:Why is asking something I didn't understand wasting time?

The essential part of that is why are you not scum hunting?

1. I'm not playing to please you, I think I've been okay compared to most,
2. You can say that about 75% of the playlist,
3. if you get out of your tunnel you'll realize that I've asked questions to people whom I want to develop a read on, but they haven't responded yet.

Your conclusion on Ginngie's mistake is stupid, it's like you have a read and you are trying to fit it into that(conf bias).

In post 1536, Ame wrote:Did you not read my exchange with Raya below the post you quoted?

Point out exactly what you want me to look at. I read it, not sure what you are referring to.

In post 1534, Ginngie wrote:well this has never happened ever in the history of mafia so we dont have to worry about that

seeing how observant you are, it wouldn't surprise me if you missed it.

In post 1537, Knightmare491 wrote:

In post 1535, Ame wrote:

In post 1531, Knightmare491 wrote:Why is asking something I didn't understand wasting time?

The essential part of that is why are you not scum hunting?

1. I'm not playing to please you, I think I've been okay compared to most,
2. You can say that about 75% of the playlist,
3. if you get out of your tunnel you'll realize that I've asked questions to people whom I want to develop a read on, but they haven't responded yet.

1 snd 2 are deflection fallacies and irrelevant. Regarding 3, who are these people you want to develop a read on? Me? Because it seems most of your questions have been directed toward me. The last person to prematurely regard me as tunneling flipped scum.

In post 1538, Knightmare491 wrote:Your conclusion on Ginngie's mistake is stupid, it's like you have a read and you are trying to fit it into that(conf bias).

This is somewhat accurate actually. I'm presuming you're scum and that Gennie wouldn't make that mistake about her partner.

In post 1539, Knightmare491 wrote:

In post 1536, Ame wrote:Did you not read my exchange with Raya below the post you quoted?

Point out exactly what you want me to look at. I read it, not sure what you are referring to.

It's two posts below what you quoted. Raya asked me to elaborate right after I made the post:

In post 1372, Ame wrote:

In post 1370, Raya36 wrote:You're saying you trust Mastina calling Ginngie town even if Mastina is scum?

Yes, because of this:

In post 884, Ginngie wrote:

In post 882, Ame wrote:(1) Do you have an impression of mastina's alignment?
(2) Does mastina town read you when you're town regardless of her alignment? Or has she ever pushed you when she was scum?
(3) TT Go is actually pretty funny!

town, I like her use of emojis(read the chart nerds)

mastina will never compromise her ability to read me. She gives that up I no longer have to worry about her ever again.

So again, did you not read this?

In post 1541, Ame wrote:1 snd 2 are deflection fallacies and irrelevant. Regarding 3, who are these people you want to develop a read on? Me? Because it seems most of your questions have been directed toward me. The last person to prematurely regard me as tunneling flipped scum.

pine/nk15/momo

In post 1543, Ame wrote:So again, did you not read this?

I read that, that doesn't answer my question. Which is why I asked.

In post 1526, Pink Ball wrote:I think she cleared up that she meant that she needed one more xp than she already had, not that she needed only 1 xp. And that's what I understood in the first place so what momo did was scummy lol

In post 1525, Creature wrote:Did spring admit to lie about the 1 xp upgrade?

Well, today, spring asked for 2 xp. With 1 xp from the Town Lord and 1 xp as a base... thats 4 xp.... and does not add up under any circumstances. And they have never addressed that... which means they are scum.

In post 1545, Knightmare491 wrote:I read that, that doesn't answer my question. Which is why I asked.

I don't understand your question then. I need more than 'explain.'

Are you fully caught up?

I have to go prepare for classes and I really don't feel like it

In post 1544, Knightmare491 wrote:pine/nk15/momo

Why these three in particular? And what happened to using Fark associations?

Ok I have to go now.