Page 62 of 78

Posted: Mon Jun 22, 2020 4:59 am
by notscience
Why not target prana who’s been the subject of towns focus lol

Posted: Mon Jun 22, 2020 5:05 am
by bob3141
Gut instinct is that flippy is town.

klick comments towards flippy dont read as s/s

if flippy is town then its likely una and bm are town.

As scum would need a doc to get any false clears. And that usual happens in games town has a vig

Posted: Mon Jun 22, 2020 5:08 am
by notscience
It is a touch weird he chose to target bm when bm was claiming vig all day yesterday

Posted: Mon Jun 22, 2020 5:09 am
by bob3141
In post 1520, PranaDevil wrote:
In post 1512, bob3141 wrote:VOTE: prana devil

Why choose to watch the one play sure to get nightkilled
Because if Una gets nightkilled, I get to know who it is.

I would have watched Agar, but because notscience so kindly made a thing about it in thread, it turned the whole fucking thing into a WIFOM deal. And he fucking knows it.

So let's see... Hoopla/notscience as scum? I could see that. But maybe it would be way too blatant.

So I'm positive one is scum, and the other is budding them for town cred at this stage.

Both, however, are doing their damndest to twist the facts though.

why did you think una would ever be killed

Scum are down one player.

There is watcher that can get guilties.

Why do you think they wouldnt target eitehr teh confirmed roleblocker or a claimed watcher. A role they would know is true or not.


Confirmed towny vs confirmed townie/confirmed roleblocker

Who do you think anyone in there right mind would pick

Posted: Mon Jun 22, 2020 5:10 am
by Emperor flippyNips
In post 1525, notscience wrote:Why not target prana who’s been the subject of towns focus lol

That’s fair. I wanted to send my fruits to people I town read to see how good I am at town reading people I guess



Pedit: I really didn’t pay attention d2. I popped in commented on what I saw and then dipped. I don’t even know how klick got caught

Posted: Mon Jun 22, 2020 5:12 am
by notscience
Bob he’s scum he can’t target himself with the night kill

Posted: Mon Jun 22, 2020 5:28 am
by bob3141
In post 1530, notscience wrote:Bob he’s scum he can’t target himself with the night kill



I was on about that if he was town that scum would know he was a watcher. Thus any nightkill would either be on him or agar

A town watcher would be thinking either agar dies in which case i get guilty. Or I die in which case it doesn't matter. Not thinking oh they might kill una.


9/10 scum kill the watcher anyway. Would scum really risk being guilty over killing a town pr with no risk. Especially when they are one down.

The only risk would be it fails. And since a doc is highly unlikely if prana was a town watcher. Why would scum not try

Posted: Mon Jun 22, 2020 6:48 am
by Battle Mage
In post 1511, Hoopla wrote:UNVOTE:
VOTE: battle mage

actually, might be better to lynch the buddy first, on the small, small chance prana is town
seriously dude, wtf? I'm conf-town (and well fed - thanks Nips!).

VOTE: Hoopla

This has to be scum.

Posted: Mon Jun 22, 2020 6:48 am
by Battle Mage
In post 1523, Emperor flippyNips wrote:Hi I’m here. I got some errands to run before I really start going, but I do want to say this. I fibbed about my role. I really had two shots, I sent a fruit to BM and he’s unarmed
thanks, it was delicious! Now, join me in lynching Hoopla-scum! :D

Posted: Mon Jun 22, 2020 6:50 am
by Battle Mage
In post 1510, Gypyx wrote:Hey BM, didn't you claim you were shooting Notscience?
Hey Gypyx, didn't you admit you were scum though? :cool: Blatant rolefishing here... :eek:

Posted: Mon Jun 22, 2020 6:52 am
by Battle Mage
In post 1526, bob3141 wrote:Gut instinct is that flippy is town.

klick comments towards flippy dont read as s/s

if flippy is town then its likely una and bm are town.

As scum would need a doc to get any false clears. And that usual happens in games town has a vig
I wish you would stop this setup speculation stuff. Yesterday you were mostly just wrong, today I can't even work out what you're trying to say! :lol:

Scum would need a doc to get any false clears???

Posted: Mon Jun 22, 2020 6:55 am
by Battle Mage
In post 1529, Emperor flippyNips wrote:
In post 1525, notscience wrote:Why not target prana who’s been the subject of towns focus lol

That’s fair. I wanted to send my fruits to people I town read to see how good I am at town reading people I guess



Pedit: I really didn’t pay attention d2. I pooped in commented on what I saw and then dripped. I don’t even know how klick got caught
To be honest, you've just made me immortal because I'm NK-proof and now basically unlynchable until endgame. I FEEL SO MUCH POWER :lol:

And yes, ignore those people complaining - they are just angry that they cant get a mislynch on me now. Your townread was good! Hoopla's reads...eh, not so much. :giggle:

Posted: Mon Jun 22, 2020 7:02 am
by Battle Mage
Seriously though, what the fuck is this? The only person voting me, and pretending like it's a sure thing I'd be lynched but also "don't rush!". Scummy as all hell.

Honestly, Hoopla's case on me yesterday was pretty woeful and rather than re-evaluate like somebody town would, she has just doubled-down and hoped to bombard me into submission.

However Hoopla did get one thing right - lynching the claimed Watcher today is fking dumb, because it will sort itself out tonight. So let's lynch Hoopla instead. Or as an alternative suggestion, we can let the conf-towns decide the play between them. Emp can get involved too, since his play was good and I'm willing to call him basically conf-town at this point.

I also think we should seriously consider a mass-claim, given the amount of town PRs already outted. Hoopla slipped there is only 1 scum left, but that could be a ruse.
In post 1511, Hoopla wrote:UNVOTE:
VOTE: battle mage

actually, might be better to lynch the buddy first, on the small, small chance prana is town
In post 1517, Hoopla wrote:it's more insurance on the off-chance prana is town. if we lynch his buddy today, scum is pretty much forced to kill town-prana, as one scum alive means a correct watch loses the game outright.

but you're probably right. trying to eke out a slither more EV from a day where we have obv-scum on the ropes is just petty squibbling.
In post 1518, Hoopla wrote:i'd rather everyone checked in and had a chat before we lynch though - especially given yesterday was a short phase.

Posted: Mon Jun 22, 2020 7:05 am
by Battle Mage
In post 1512, bob3141 wrote:VOTE: prana devil

Why choose to watch the one play sure to get nightkilled
Bob, now I'm confirmed town, PLEASE LISTEN TO ME. STOP THIS STUFF. If Prana is still alive tomorrow, or if it doesn't stack up after a massclaim, I'll consider joining you on that lynch. Today we should lynch Hoopla, the town-leader elect who insists on lynching town at every opportunity.

Posted: Mon Jun 22, 2020 7:11 am
by notscience
In post 1537, Battle Mage wrote:However Hoopla did get one thing right - lynching the claimed Watcher today is fking dumb, because it will sort itself out tonight. So let's lynch Hoopla instead. Or as an alternative suggestion, we can let the conf-towns decide the play between them. Emp can get involved too, since his play was good and I'm willing to call him basically conf-town at this point.
They’ve had multiple chances to take him out.

Posted: Mon Jun 22, 2020 7:15 am
by Battle Mage
In post 1539, notscience wrote:
In post 1537, Battle Mage wrote:However Hoopla did get one thing right - lynching the claimed Watcher today is fking dumb, because it will sort itself out tonight. So let's lynch Hoopla instead. Or as an alternative suggestion, we can let the conf-towns decide the play between them. Emp can get involved too, since his play was good and I'm willing to call him basically conf-town at this point.
They’ve had multiple chances to take him out.
Not even going to dignify this with a response - just bus your buddy Hoopla already. :facepalm:

Posted: Mon Jun 22, 2020 7:16 am
by notscience
No, we’re lynching prana like we should have done two days ago.

Posted: Mon Jun 22, 2020 7:20 am
by Battle Mage
In post 1541, notscience wrote:No, we’re lynching prana like we should have done two days ago.
scum don't get to choose the lynch though. You had the chance to NK him last night, not my problem!

Posted: Mon Jun 22, 2020 7:24 am
by notscience
Let me make this incredibly clear to you-

Last night, instead of going to the claimed PR who had a (proven correct) guilty, he targeted someone else because I tried to leash him in thread. If I’m scum, why the fuck would I try to leash him to the target I planned on night killing?

Posted: Mon Jun 22, 2020 7:27 am
by notscience
What town pr actually thinks scum is going to night kill an innocent claim over the three claimed prs?

Posted: Mon Jun 22, 2020 7:30 am
by Battle Mage
VOTE: Hoopla

I'm ready to end the day.

Posted: Mon Jun 22, 2020 7:32 am
by notscience
I’ll take that as “you’re right and I know it but I’ve dug my feet in”

It’s okay BM, we’ve all been there. Feel free to join the wagon whenever you’re ready.

Posted: Mon Jun 22, 2020 7:45 am
by Battle Mage
In post 1546, notscience wrote:I’ll take that as “you’re right and I know it but I’ve dug my feet in”

It’s okay BM, we’ve all been there. Feel free to join the wagon whenever you’re ready.
I'm 100% sure I'm not lynching our Watcher today. Are you playing the "too scummy to be scum" card here?

I prefer to lynch Hoopla, but I'll settle for lynching you if it's the only way we can move forward.

Posted: Mon Jun 22, 2020 7:47 am
by notscience
That’s fine because I’m pretty confident after I flip green prana goes tomorrow

Posted: Mon Jun 22, 2020 8:20 am
by Hiraki
Vote: Prana