Mafiascum.net

also i hope chara is ok

In post 1521, Fun and Games wrote:

In post 1448, Noraa wrote:Fun and games is a hydra I take it.

I've never played with anyone called skitter so I cannot tell

but this hyperposting sure makes me think excited scum. It also feels like you kinda go around and sus everyone besides ur few TRs. Too much confidence feels scummy to me personally.

a) hyperposting is nai for me, ask jingle or penguin. kinda baffled how you're getting to 'excited scum' from hyperposting. didn't sircakez indicate that you also hyperpost? are you scum each time?

b) i've repeatedly said that i have like 5 or so townreads, and that i find the rest of the game either scummy or null. not sure what the issue is with that, and given that a lot of the scummy/null slots aren't posting, there's not much i can necessasrily do about it either

hyperposting isnt AI for me and don't turn the tables that defensively otherwise I'll just think ur more scummy. I specifically said I haven't played with u before so I don't know if the point applies. And also earlier, u said u hadn't been hyper posting soooo this backtracking is interesting.

Ur TRs also flip to SRs really fast which is interesting. What the issue is? nothing big. Ur likely scum tho.

can I get the bingle wagon reasoning in a sentence or so, I'm trying to play several games fast rn

In post 1523, Fun and Games wrote:

In post 1507, Noraa wrote:You had a TR on Bingle. Then everyone flipped on Bingle. Then you lurked for a huge portion of them arguing about Bingle and when you come back, its to say you have moved to the Bingle wagon. Is that not scummy. Ur not THAT present in the thread but its clear as hell that ur "present" just not talking. Ur lurking.

this is a ridiculously bad-faith-y way of representing what happened while ignoring the context of what prompted the change to the bingle wagon (namely, that he posted scummy in ways on uncharacteristic of townhim)

also i was vla for the weekend, i said i would be last week even ...

no this happened yesterday while I was online.

In post 1524, Fun and Games wrote:noraa you made a big stink about me not fully responding to you but aren't really responding to my responses ...

I replied

In post 1528, Gamma Emerald wrote:can I get the bingle wagon reasoning in a sentence or so, I'm trying to play several games fast rn

Fun and games starts vanity wagons, sheeps consensus reads even when they are on people that were TRs just a few hours ago, and basically doesn't have reads.

In post 1530, Noraa wrote:

In post 1528, Gamma Emerald wrote:can I get the bingle wagon reasoning in a sentence or so, I'm trying to play several games fast rn

Fun and games starts vanity wagons, sheeps consensus reads even when they are on people that were TRs just a few hours ago, and basically doesn't have reads.

I aint making a case on a TR of mine lel

In post 1527, Noraa wrote:hyperposting isnt AI for me and don't turn the tables that defensively otherwise I'll just think ur more scummy. I specifically said I haven't played with u before so I don't know if the point applies. And also earlier, u said u hadn't been hyper posting soooo this backtracking is interesting.

Ur TRs also flip to SRs really fast which is interesting. What the issue is? nothing big. Ur likely scum tho.

maybe don't make silly arguments that just as equally apply to yourself ...
if you don't i woudln't feel the need to point out the hypocrisy

i'm informing you that hyperposting is nai for me
i told you who in this game you can ask to verify that
it's apparently a relevant part of your read so given that i'm informing you ti's invalid, i would expect your read to change (perhaps in some small way) to suit

i've been very mercurial, i've sometimes been hyperposting, i sometimes haven't been this game

I literally said I didnt know if it applied what more do you want?

so what if hyper posting isnt AI for me? Its AI for tons of fucking people. Why can I not use it?

In post 1528, Gamma Emerald wrote:can I get the bingle wagon reasoning in a sentence or so, I'm trying to play several games fast rn

He has few reads and not really trying to engage and threw a bunch of AtE rage out when the wagon built

If it applies to them, it applies. If it doesn't, it doesn't.

In post 1535, SirCakez wrote:

In post 1528, Gamma Emerald wrote:can I get the bingle wagon reasoning in a sentence or so, I'm trying to play several games fast rn

He has few reads and not really trying to engage and threw a bunch of AtE rage out when the wagon built

I agree with the AtE part. He did do that. The rest ... eh.

Noraa vs F and G is so dumb

In post 1530, Noraa wrote:Fun and games starts vanity wagons, sheeps consensus reads even when they are on people that were TRs just a few hours ago

Isn't it because there are 2 different heads?
Why is it scummy?

In post 1383, Bingle wrote:

In post 1368, Fun and Games wrote:i'd have preferred a response wherein you explained the bad penguin vote or you explain how you only have 1.5 townreads at this stage

I only have 1.5 townreads because I can see literally all of the people as scum. It's not a difficult concept. I voted Penguin because of all the people who I think are legitimate options for today, he's the one that I think is the best elimination for the ability to win the game. He's not likely to do much of anything while I'm around. I'm not likely to do much of anything while he's around. He, just like just about everyone, could very well be scum. He's done absolutely nothing town indicative, and dealing with his perpetual tunnels on me is just getting exhausting, tbh. It's not even really his fault, I just don't have enough motivation to deal with it even though I usually enjoy our banter.

this was the post that got me to vote Bingle ftr

In post 1538, SirCakez wrote:Noraa vs F and G is so dumb

In post 1539, I Keep Siteflaking wrote:

In post 1530, Noraa wrote:Fun and games starts vanity wagons, sheeps consensus reads even when they are on people that were TRs just a few hours ago

Isn't it because there are 2 different heads?
Why is it scummy?

its been skitter this whole time

In post 1528, Gamma Emerald wrote:can I get the bingle wagon reasoning in a sentence or so, I'm trying to play several games fast rn

his current push on penguin is quite bad, it basically reads as a long-winded omgus of penguin
he originally claimed that this wasn't penguin's scum mo, but then informed me that scum!penguin always tunneled town!him. he linked a game to prove that, and ignored me when i pointed out that scum!penguin did not, in fact, tunnel him in the game he linked
he's ignoring my reasons to think penguin is town
he can't explain why penguin is scummy in any greater depth than the above

while he's insisting on his bad epnguin vote he's been trying to portray sircakez as scummy and has been appealing to me to switch my vote there, even tho he says he isn't townreading me either

altogether this is not a good pattern ^

he's been arguing in bad faith

he has exactly 1.5 townreads, and i expect better from him at this point

In post 1529, Noraa wrote:no this happened yesterday while I was online.

my reasoning to move to bingle happened before you were online ...

In post 1533, Noraa wrote:I literally said I didnt know if it applied what more do you want?

i literally told you it does ...

In post 1534, Noraa wrote:so what if hyper posting isnt AI for me? Its AI for tons of fucking people. Why can I not use it?

Because. It. Isn't. AI. For. Me. Either.

In post 1531, Noraa wrote:

In post 1530, Noraa wrote:

In post 1528, Gamma Emerald wrote:can I get the bingle wagon reasoning in a sentence or so, I'm trying to play several games fast rn

Fun and games starts vanity wagons, sheeps consensus reads even when they are on people that were TRs just a few hours ago, and basically doesn't have reads.

I aint making a case on a TR of mine lel

valid comment, and I like your approach there. F&G's mech talk has seemed very go-with-the-flow too so I can go with that wagon
VOTE: fun & games

PEdit: first off that's not really in a senctence or close to it, and I think that's not damning for Bingle, plus Noraa raised good points against you so I'm not inclined to take your word

In post 1530, Noraa wrote:Fun and games starts vanity wagons, sheeps consensus reads even when they are on people that were TRs just a few hours ago

Why is it scummy?

In post 1535, SirCakez wrote:

In post 1528, Gamma Emerald wrote:can I get the bingle wagon reasoning in a sentence or so, I'm trying to play several games fast rn

He has few reads and not really trying to engage and threw a bunch of AtE rage out when the wagon built

this is a little better but could you point out the ate rage in particular so I can make my own sense of it

In post 1546, Gamma Emerald wrote:PEdit: first off that's not really in a senctence or close to it, and I think that's not damning for Bingle, plus Noraa raised good points against you so I'm not inclined to take your word

a) explain why this isn't damning for bingle
b) what points from noraa are good