Posted: Thu Dec 30, 2021 12:22 pm
where the hell are you pulling nsg out from now?
https://forum.mafiascum-staging.net/
Crap. I tried. Who are you scum with thenIn post 1523, innocentvillager wrote:incorrectIn post 1518, Sleepless Assassin wrote:I'm pretty confident in Innocentvillager and Flow Trap being scum
I thought it was fine because he did have an early townread on me in another game. But comparing the language used for the tr, that game it seemed to be mostly feeling (which is ok) and this game he actually gave reasons. But the reasons here look a little manufactured.In post 1512, skitter30 wrote:I mean why did you like his townread earlier ?
I recall dats, faker, and catboi, and i think there were at least one or two others as wellIn post 1532, SirCakez wrote:Who is even calling her townie
My point is that "narrative" implies some deeper analysis and, well, narrative arc.In post 1505, midwaybear wrote:I felt like my Datisi read was biased and it began to bias other reads because of that (for example: datisi scum -> skitter town).
In post 1535, skitter30 wrote:I recall dats, faker, and catboi, and i think there were at least one or two others as well
In post 1501, Faker wrote:Nullish
=========
...
-northsidegal: Her first set of catchup posts were fine and she was in Townish. I then ISO'd her to remind myself what they were while typing this. I then said "This is stupid, don't see why she doesn't make these criticisms as scum" and moved her down to Nullish. Then I remembered I liked the Skygazer bit, and moved her back up. Now I'm like "Nah".FINAL VERDICT: NULLSIDEGAL
I am really struggling to contextualize this in light of Slaughter Hour, where I believe you struggled to get a townread on him and wound up shoving him through? My memory might be failing.In post 923, catboi wrote:I don't feel like him being in catchup mode is remotely AI especially given the speed of the thread. I feel like Ishouldbe able to actually get a read on him at some point this game but I can't get it the way he is now, just have to Have Patience
kind of a meh vote
Hm, I can sort of see what you mean. Probably why flow took you out of his poe.In post 1536, Faker wrote:there is a world of difference between being personally affable and being actively diplomatic
I found it odd that they were willing to de-escalate their suspicions of each so quickly so I thought that one of them was scum looking to avoid a fight. I did not think that one of them was more suspicious at the time, but if you asked me at the time I would probably say Datisi for backing off first. Now, it seems more nai since it looks like they do similar stuff every gamestart.In post 1538, Faker wrote:Which begs the question, why is their discussion not TvT?
Agreeing with his opening statement didn't factor into my read of him at all really.In post 1538, Faker wrote:Unclear where this factors in
I thought Datisi was scummy because his play didn't really fit in with my expectation of how a town him would play. I don't think I have played much with Datisi, but I have followed a few games he was in and I got the impression that he was pretty free flowing (speaking his thoughts) as town. ig his opening just didn't match up with that because now that I look back he looks ok.In post 1538, Faker wrote:Why did you begin to believe Datisi specifically was scum in these, and why did it strengthen?
fair enuf. i somehow read that and got to a townlean, not sure how i did thatIn post 1501, Faker wrote:-northsidegal: Her first set of catchup posts were fine and she was in Townish. I then ISO'd her to remind myself what they were while typing this. I then said "This is stupid, don't see why she doesn't make these criticisms as scum" and moved her down to Nullish. Then I remembered I liked the Skygazer bit, and moved her back up. Now I'm like "Nah". FINAL VERDICT: NULLSIDEGAL
This feels really forcedIn post 1542, midwaybear wrote:I did not think that one of them was more suspicious at the time, but if you asked me at the time I would probably say Datisi for backing off first.
In post 1505, midwaybear wrote:Can you elaborate on these characteristics a bit? From the standard definition, Faker seems relatively diplomatic this game (he even mentioned that it was basically the goal of the alt).
I feel like the 2 you listed are the easiest to push, so you better have some good reasons tomorrowIn post 1518, Sleepless Assassin wrote:I'll have a big post to dump tomorrow. If anyone is curious about my reads I'm pretty confident in Innocentvillager and Flow Trap being scum.
Interesting. I'm sure I'll see that when I'm caught up but if that's true I think we're in good shape.In post 1546, flow trap wrote:I feel like the 2 you listed are the easiest to push, so you better have some good reasons tomorrowIn post 1518, Sleepless Assassin wrote:I'll have a big post to dump tomorrow. If anyone is curious about my reads I'm pretty confident in Innocentvillager and Flow Trap being scum.