Mafiascum.net

In post 1524, Frogsterking wrote:

In post 1523, MathBlade wrote:

In post 1522, Frogsterking wrote:

In post 1520, Frogsterking wrote:

In post 1517, MathBlade wrote:and now does this weird tr despite like no posts really makes me think BGC and Frog are partnered.

This is a lie, town!Math wouldn't read BGC as trustworthy.

Wtf, Freudian slip. Town!math wouldn't read BGC and I as partnered*

I think Town!math could easily FoS BGC here though. That's not a part of the reason why I FoS Math.

You wanna explain why your BGC read went from “kill it with fire”
To “conditional TR”

Based on a single prod dodge?

Nope.

In post 1513, Cape90 wrote:

In post 1487, Save The Dragons wrote:I feel like MT has contributed a lot I'm confused why people think he didn't

I think I'd go for a MariaR wagon still I do not understand why people let up the gas on that one

Titus isn't really doing anything

I dunno where BCG went

Mathblade does seem town but I didn't like his predecessor

I feel like if pooky were scum he'd be doing more or having some gimmick he does seem a little lackluster this game maybe I'm not sure what that means about his alignment

Fennec was pretty town and furtive hasn't done anything to change my mind on that

Yeah MT I think still comes across as towny, I like the way they treated your slot and also there were a lot easier pot shots then Maria.

I wouldn't mind killing Maria either but I got distracted.

Yes

Also yes

Math seems towny I think and Charloux was also towny in him responding to me when I pressured him.

Pooky read here is kind of whatever I guess. You could look at Toogeloo for this whole Gimmick argument.

Furtive has felt both solvy but yet kinda underwhelming with his content that isn't just vanilla reads.

In post 1525, MathBlade wrote:

In post 1524, Frogsterking wrote:

In post 1523, MathBlade wrote:

In post 1522, Frogsterking wrote:

In post 1520, Frogsterking wrote:

In post 1517, MathBlade wrote:and now does this weird tr despite like no posts really makes me think BGC and Frog are partnered.

This is a lie, town!Math wouldn't read BGC as trustworthy.

Wtf, Freudian slip. Town!math wouldn't read BGC and I as partnered*

I think Town!math could easily FoS BGC here though. That's not a part of the reason why I FoS Math.

You wanna explain why your BGC read went from “kill it with fire”
To “conditional TR”

Based on a single prod dodge?

Nope.

Then the most logical explanation is you’re defending a buddy. Titus tried to chainsaw attack me.

It’s the only thing that makes sense since Titus won’t give reads and yours are patently illogical.

Titus I am 50/50 on

But I am more than okay knocking y’all down like bowling pins

In post 1526, Frogsterking wrote:

In post 1513, Cape90 wrote:

In post 1487, Save The Dragons wrote:I feel like MT has contributed a lot I'm confused why people think he didn't

I think I'd go for a MariaR wagon still I do not understand why people let up the gas on that one

Titus isn't really doing anything

I dunno where BCG went

Mathblade does seem town but I didn't like his predecessor

I feel like if pooky were scum he'd be doing more or having some gimmick he does seem a little lackluster this game maybe I'm not sure what that means about his alignment

Fennec was pretty town and furtive hasn't done anything to change my mind on that

Yeah MT I think still comes across as towny, I like the way they treated your slot and also there were a lot easier pot shots then Maria.

I wouldn't mind killing Maria either but I got distracted.

Yes

Also yes

Math seems towny I think and Charloux was also towny in him responding to me when I pressured him.

Pooky read here is kind of whatever I guess. You could look at Toogeloo for this whole Gimmick argument.

Furtive has felt both solvy but yet kinda underwhelming with his content that isn't just vanilla reads.

Cape can you make a counter offer for who you want in the Towncore?

In post 1527, Frogsterking wrote:

In post 1525, MathBlade wrote:

In post 1524, Frogsterking wrote:

In post 1523, MathBlade wrote:

In post 1522, Frogsterking wrote:

In post 1520, Frogsterking wrote:

In post 1517, MathBlade wrote:and now does this weird tr despite like no posts really makes me think BGC and Frog are partnered.

This is a lie, town!Math wouldn't read BGC as trustworthy.

Wtf, Freudian slip. Town!math wouldn't read BGC and I as partnered*

I think Town!math could easily FoS BGC here though. That's not a part of the reason why I FoS Math.

You wanna explain why your BGC read went from “kill it with fire”
To “conditional TR”

Based on a single prod dodge?

Nope.

Then the most logical explanation is you’re defending a buddy. Titus tried to chainsaw attack me.

It’s the only thing that makes sense since Titus won’t give reads and yours are patently illogical.

Titus I am 50/50 on

But I am more than okay knocking y’all down like bowling pins

I'm not Town coring you based on your entrance, so if you want to have an impact before you die then your best bet is to read the damn game and case someone else who is within the PoE.

In post 1529, MathBlade wrote:You threatening to kill me? Then I left my reads BGC -> you -> Titus

In post 1530, Frogsterking wrote:

In post 1529, MathBlade wrote:You threatening to kill me? Then I left my reads BGC -> you -> Titus

Yeah I want you executed by the Town block once you've had a Day or two to fuck up. For example, I feel like the three names you just listed are Town because you want to induce Titus to tunnel on one of us due to "rule of 3" which I believe you are aware she mentions every single game.

In post 1531, MathBlade wrote:

In post 1530, Frogsterking wrote:

In post 1529, MathBlade wrote:You threatening to kill me? Then I left my reads BGC -> you -> Titus

Yeah I want you executed by the Town block once you've had a Day or two to fuck up. For example, I feel like the three names you just listed are Town because you want to induce Titus to tunnel on one of us due to "rule of 3" which I believe you are aware she mentions every single game.

Then why don’t you “join” me to hasten it?

If your goal is to “prove” me scum, then “prove” it already.

(Prove is in quotes as I am town)

In post 1533, Save The Dragons wrote:Just because you are loud doesn't mean you are right

In post 1535, MathBlade wrote:Since me being “loud” we have people giving reads now and playing versus stagnation and just bland. We have something to go off of

In post 1535, MathBlade wrote:Since me being “loud” we have people giving reads now and playing versus stagnation and just bland. We have something to go off of

In post 1536, MalcolmTucker wrote:

In post 1535, MathBlade wrote:Since me being “loud” we have people giving reads now and playing versus stagnation and just bland. We have something to go off of

This is a fair point. Game was stagnating for a while and while there's a lot of extraneous back and forth stuff here I do think Math's entrance has helped breathe a bit of life into the game. That feels pro-town.

In post 1506, Frogsterking wrote:3) I prefer we not spend 6 days flooding the thread with tinfoil, it's anti Town. I prefer we hash out any serious conflicts within ourselves over the next few IRL days and then vote together as a block and end D2 with Town WiM intact.

In post 1506, Frogsterking wrote:@marci
@Enchant
@Cape
@MT
@Toogle
@Titus
@BGC

1) do you have issues with any of the other 7 players (include myself on this list) I named? Now is the time to voice them.

2) are you willing to vote together on Dragons today with the assumption that the players you're currently voting will still be in the PoE the next couple of Days?

In post 1538, Save The Dragons wrote:I was talking to frogsterking my bad

In post 1506, Frogsterking wrote:

@marci
@Enchant
@Cape
@MT
@Toogle
@Titus
@BGC

1) do you have issues with any of the other 7 players (include myself on this list) I named? Now is the time to voice them.

2) are you willing to vote together on Dragons today with the assumption that the players you're currently voting will still be in the PoE the next couple of Days?

3) I prefer we not spend 6 days flooding the thread with tinfoil, it's anti Town. I prefer we hash out any serious conflicts within ourselves over the next few IRL days and then vote together as a block and end D2 with Town WiM intact.

In post 1544, MariaR wrote:Yikes, all of these wagons suck, not that I'm going to change it while I'm on vacation but meh. The people who hard pushed the Greeting wagon for BS reasons need to be looked at. Also when does Forg's BoP refer to themselves tbh?

VOTE: Frog

In post 1546, MathBlade wrote:

In post 1544, MariaR wrote:Yikes, all of these wagons suck, not that I'm going to change it while I'm on vacation but meh. The people who hard pushed the Greeting wagon for BS reasons need to be looked at. Also when does Forg's BoP refer to themselves tbh?

VOTE: Frog

Why does BCG wagon suck?

In post 1547, MariaR wrote:

In post 1546, MathBlade wrote:

In post 1544, MariaR wrote:Yikes, all of these wagons suck, not that I'm going to change it while I'm on vacation but meh. The people who hard pushed the Greeting wagon for BS reasons need to be looked at. Also when does Forg's BoP refer to themselves tbh?

VOTE: Frog

Why does BCG wagon suck?

I don't think Frog and BCG are partners and Frog>>>>>>>>>BCG