Mafiascum.net

In post 1434, pieguyn wrote:words

but overall I give this an A-

In post 1435, pieguyn wrote:town: uwop, Zdenek, baldeagle
town keeping an eye on: LB, pyro
null-town: PV, Garuda, zmuffin, morph, ProHawk

scum: Voided, Harakiri, Mhork, Klick

I'm fine with lynching anyone who's scum or missing. this whole thing pissed me off so much cause there was so much outright brutal arguing between all the hydras and I read all of it as town v. town. keeping my eye on them in case some BS happens

plz don't fuck with me on this I'm tired and I have a headache and I just read 58 pages = =

vote: VoidedMafia

if I die I'm flipping a table over so hard

aw, make it a high A.

In post 1441, PeregrineV wrote:So, I now believe if I slap you with a duck, it quacks, and everyone goes "Holy Shit you see that duckslap!", and you say "Why you hit me with a chicken?", that you are scum.

I wish you had used this line against someone I can agree is scum, so I could sheep it.

In post 1462, Seanald wrote:well its how town destroyed the game in marketplace 2.

By using Austerity Measures? I don't think it was.

In post 1468, Garuda wrote:Usually we don't interact much in games; you call me scum in a troll/non-trolling way I'm never quite able to distinguish between and then I'm called up to read you even though we both know my grasp of your meta is not so good. Why didn't you like our Klick vote?

Usually you're scum and don't interact with me, that's true. You interacted with my plenty in Perpetual MyLo, though.

I don't remember disliking any Klick votes. I think Klick votes are probably fine votes. I'm not sure about Quilford's feelings about Klick, though; I mentioned that I didn't like Klick day 1 to him and he said he felt the same way about the game and that he didn't think it was that bad. I don't think he had a full on townread or anything, though.

In post 1554, uʍop ǝpısdn wrote:I mentioned that I didn't like Klick day 1 to him and he said he felt the same way about the game and that he didn't think it was that bad.

Quilford felt the same way about the game as Klick did*

In post 1479, 1baldeagle1 wrote:Tonight, I want to try to get all of the last abilities reshuffled, so we can get the abilities back.

How do we did this? Is there a way to influence how many abilities are up for auction?

In post 1490, Voidedmafia wrote:This Klick wagon is making me feel slightly uneasy. It just started feeling...wrong along the way, and I don't like that feeling. Part of it may be with eagle howling for my lynch all of today and then suddenly getting off at the point where he actually could've gotten me lynched. Reeks of oppurtunsm, and I'd rather we either lynch nero or have everyone give eagle a second look.

I don't even care what Quilford has to say about Klick anymore. I am now A-OK with a Klick lynch.

Voided/Mhork/Klick now who's the other hand?

In post 1496, Voidedmafia wrote:And...you do know I'm getting that $50 if I'm not lynched, plus efficiency, right?

What does this mean? Is it some kind of threat or what?

In post 1508, Lost Butterfly wrote:

In post 1487, Cabd wrote:Ffery can quote this for ISO later stuck in class but klick that was unethical as fuck. PL speedlynch go!

Hey. Uh, no? Can we not lynch the guy who towntold pretty hard with that whole page. That'd own!

I didn't like his posts day 1, particularly the uh, fucking "here's my scumteam lol ez" post which felt fake confidence but I don't think he'd do what he just do as scum.

I don't know why you think Klick isn't capable of faking all that crap? I've seen him replace out as mafia in very similar circumstances before.

In post 1524, zMuffinMan wrote:and banakai is the only player i haven't formed a read on one way or the other. i didn't know where to put him in that list so i just left him out.

Didn't pieguy just replace Banakai?

pieguy was guille i think

In post 1525, Lost Butterfly wrote:I'm also starting to feel worse about Voidedmafia today, since I feel like some of the points in his walls have been insincere and opportunistic. It's hard to explain; in particular, his habit of quoting posts and going, "Ohhhh, you're looking SCUMMIER! This looks even scummier than that" pings my gut.

I also noticed this, but most of them were directed towards me so I didn't want to say anything in case it was confirmation bias.

In post 1544, BBmolla wrote:Dont wanna read upside's crap

me neither. that guy's an

In post 1559, uʍop ǝpısdn wrote:I don't know why you think Klick isn't capable of faking all that crap? I've seen him replace out as mafia in very similar circumstances before.

link?

I am unsure about morph's plan. It seems unnecessarily complicated. What is the point? Putting all of town's money in one place?

In post 1564, zMuffinMan wrote:

In post 1559, uʍop ǝpısdn wrote:I don't know why you think Klick isn't capable of faking all that crap? I've seen him replace out as mafia in very similar circumstances before.

link?

it was a newbie game and I was a doctor. Let me go find it...

it's OK i think i found it (haven't read it yet)

http://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.php?f=50&t=23495

I didn't read it again yet either, but I remember Tierce having a go at him in postgame.

yeah tierce thought it was a strategic replace out, but i don't think it was. and the situation was a bit different to here.

meh, i still think he looks townish.

i'll probably switch to voided if the nero wagon doesn't pick up any steam soon.

In post 1478, pieguyn wrote:189. mb but it seems so fake. if it was a joke I feel the tone would be less serious. but there seemed to be a lot of killing intent, if you will, in that statement, which makes me think it's fake.

Like I said, the pun was just terrible. It's basically threatening making the "say a really bad joke and get shot mid-sentence" gag.

In post 1478, pieguyn wrote:474. scum obviously started with more money than us so I don't think it's at all guaranteed we'll be able to keep stuff out of their hands atm. we can see later, but I feel it's not an assumption we can make at this time.

Fair enough. I know that in the previous Marketplace we were able to get enough money into enough town hands that we were able to keep scum off most of the auctions (or at least the important ones) or make them fight hard for it, hence why I think we can do the same thing here.

In post 1478, pieguyn wrote:442. it seemed genuine. plz don't make me go all the way back and try to correlate with what LB was doing at that time I'm too tired for that shit. besides what does LB have to do with this

I asked because LB also liked that post by zdenek. I was curious as to whether or not your reasons for liking it were the same as LB's.

In post 1478, pieguyn wrote:156. for me it gives the impression you're trying to avoid getting heat for responding to something that wasn't intended towards you

Then why would I initially respond as if I was expecting to argue about it and get heat over it, or include the "but still" in the parenthesis?

In post 1478, pieguyn wrote:524. I'm referring to how when baldeagle asks you one question about one thing you said, you point them pointing out "just that one thing" as a major thing. that kind of logic is fallacious and I find it's an easy way for scum to put suspicion on people.

Baldeagle claims my townread on LB is because of his push on LB. By this point FaraMina had already retracted their II claim, which I had called them town for, and note how he characterizes my explanation for the read as being solely due to the fact that I townread LB based on his push and doesn't mention what I thought about their gambit with the II, again despite the fact that I had more to the LB townread than just his push.

In post 1478, pieguyn wrote:I'm saying there's a real possiblity you faked that claim with all the discussion about the neighborizer.

So...why would fake that I bid on Neighborizor when I didn't even win it? What's the sucm motivation for doing that?

In post 1478, pieguyn wrote:785. asking a question is pro-town. the fact that you don't want them to do this indicates you don't wanna possibly take suspicion for your answers to the questions

At the time I hadn't realized that the two posts in question were actually very similar for their first halves (and I STILL don't understand how that happened), so I thought Nero was trying to place what looked like unfounded suspicion on me with what appeared to be a useless question.

In post 1478, pieguyn wrote:982. a. no cause then someone can go and point it out and it'd make you look even worse

So how is actually admitting that I messed up scummy?

In post 1478, pieguyn wrote:b. that's not "where it came from". it came from everything I pointed out in my catch up post. assuming it was all because of the first thing that happened is fallacious logic.

2nd thing, but that's where you said I was decidedly scum. Most of what follows is based off of that point, no?

In post 1452, PeregrineV wrote:He hasn't, even though he's had the chance.

Well, yeah, now he has, but it just looks like stupidity rather than scummy.

In post 1452, PeregrineV wrote:Hermy was lynched over Seanald yesterday.

You are aware that Hermy wasn't lynched because of that post (though it was the main factor)?

In post 1535, morph the cat wrote:You don't say.

What the hell is this supposed to mean?

In post 1536, Lost Butterfly wrote:Then why did you use the words "I would

hope

," Voided? I'm not sure I understand what you mean--this came after there already WAS no kill N1. What was your endgame by trying to conceal this from the scum (who I'd assume would know their kill had failed)?

Good question. It was probably based on the idea that I could look interesting due to a faulty idea that I'm smacking myself over now.

In post 1557, uʍop ǝpısdn wrote:I don't even care what Quilford has to say about Klick anymore. I am now A-OK with a Klick lynch.

Yes, how dare I state my unease with how something happened. Bad VM!

In post 1558, uʍop ǝpısdn wrote:What does this mean? Is it some kind of threat or what?

I'm pointing out how stupid Baldy's "at least Voided isn't getting money!" argument is if I'm not lynched today.

In post 1547, uʍop ǝpısdn wrote:Even if that whole misdirection thing between 1330 and 1363 hadn't happened, I'd still find this really shitty. For one thing, I wasn't "insisting on what I thought of Hermy" in that post. I was calling Tammy out for a stupid point. If it were some sort of "insistence on using the font", why did you quote the first time I did it when you called me out?

It looks like insistence on the point to me, and the font made it look worse, like you were trying to yell it enough so that we'd understand or something. And then further usage of it made it annoying as well.

In post 1454, PeregrineV wrote:

In post 1451, Nero Cain wrote:Both Love potion and Vote Freezer are extremely pro-town and it would make it harder for scum to mislynch. I'll go into a longer explanation later if need be and repond to some other stuff when I get back home.

Did this happen?

yes

In post 1571, Voidedmafia wrote:What the hell is this supposed to mean?

It means that you appear to have scumslipped.

In post 1573, morph the cat wrote:It means that you appear to have scumslipped.

I making a conjecture about how the NK might've been used under the assumption that Pere-scum's team got both the NK and neighborizer, How is that a slip?