Posted: Wed May 07, 2014 4:27 pm
He is, but I'm not. I really do think that jake needs to dieIn post 1472, Hello Kitty Creampuff wrote:we are exhausted from scumreading jake and having nothing happen from it, it saddens us
https://forum.mafiascum-staging.net/
He is, but I'm not. I really do think that jake needs to dieIn post 1472, Hello Kitty Creampuff wrote:we are exhausted from scumreading jake and having nothing happen from it, it saddens us
yesIn post 1547, Squirrel Girl wrote:Do you think I'm nutty?
I think it's a pretty defensible position to say that he didn't express such a great belief in scum in the first part so as to lack a vote is not strange.
having genuine suspicion requires a town role PM.In post 1352, Aj The Epic wrote:Anti, since your claiming a blocker role, why SHOULD we believe this is any more than a ploy to get him lynched?All I've gotten from you so far is you'll do anything you can to get the people you have the slightest suspicion on lynched.Why wouldn't you have RB'd me or Kdub, the two you were vehemently against?
Another naked vote?
I actually agree with this. I also agree that muffin/SMP don't make sense either and am willing to say Muffin is town.In post 1428, Antihero wrote:jake's a tough nut to crack. he's playing to the scum win condition, but gut's still telling me he's not scum.In post 1427, Hello Kitty Creampuff wrote:Scum is scum, regardless of their role. you think there is another scum-PR, though?In post 1411, Antihero wrote:mara, while jake is an honorary mafia goon, i think we could do better.
based on reactions to the claim yesterday, i think it's AJ and muffin.
VOTE: AJ
muffin/SMP doesn't make sense. I'm thinking it's probably Kdub/Jake
You're amazing.
This may come as a shock to you, but you can have more than one scumread you know? Like, there's probably one more scum on top of Jake (probably two since Jake's not scum!) This pretty much looks like you're using your scumread on Jake as a basis for not doing anything.In post 1472, Hello Kitty Creampuff wrote:we are exhausted from scumreading jake and having nothing happen from it, it saddens us
There's not one post in my ISO that defends SMP. Believe it or not (and I know you'll struggle with this) but I looked at an SMP lynch from both perspectives - I liked your case but you were tunnelling the ever living fuck out of him based on like 2 games and I wasn't sure if that was because you were scum pursuing an easy town lynch or not. I didn't try and "smear" your name, and then again during SMP/anti I looked at both sides of the argument and guess what? Neither made sense. I know you're super godly town, but do better.In post 1483, Jake from State Farm wrote:vote: mac
when smp was getting run up the first time, he had like 5 votes and mac was defensive of smp and trying to smear my name. He also was lightly defensive of SMP during the anti/smp claim thing but said smp is the only viable lynch. Given smp fliped a scum pr, this defense stands out to me.
The people most likely partners with SMP are in the group of mac/hkc/zmuffinman with mac/zmuffin the most likely pair.
Looking at the interactions between the 3, smp/mac/zmuffin REALLY make sense. Somebody check my work
Casually ignoring that I was V/LA. Thanks Jake!In post 1497, Jake from State Farm wrote:it's also noteworthy that the only people trying to do stuff are people who are most likely town meanwhile zmuffin and mac are waiting to see where they can hop on and not be suspicious. Townies would be trying harder to find scum, especially when townies have the edge.
so go ahead and berate me, insult me, slander my name, or do whatever it is you think you can to distract town away from you but I guarantee if the other townies actually do their own work they will probably come to a similar conclusion.
1) I didn't defend scumIn post 1520, Aegor wrote: If anyone strongly believes that Mac or AJ is town, please make your case. At this point, I fail to see any reason whatsoever to let two slots that have produced nothing of substance (or, in Mac's case, a defense of scum and nothing else except unexplained flip-flopping on the Day 1 HS) by Day 3 live.
Believe me, I can.In post 1529, zMuffinMan wrote:i don't think you can or do!
In post 1546, BROseidon wrote:Trying to read this game is the worst :/
btw I didn't ignore it but you declared it on the 5th and it was a 1 day v/la meanwhile the game had already been open almost 3 full days before you declared it. Game opened on the 2nd so where were you the 2nd, 3rd, and 4th? You weren't on a declared v/la those days...Casually ignoring that I was V/LA. Thanks Jake!