Mafiascum.net

Yay we got some posts and replacements?

Unfortunately Titus is a lot better at scum than town but I think I'll be able to get a good reason on her slot. Did a lot of meta research for the last game we were in.

Man NJAC's entrance copying Titus's entrance is so awkward

Eggman, do you think creature's recent posts have been scummy?

I would like f-oh-ex to explain his reads more, but petroleum, can you explain why what you pointed out is alignment indicative?

In post 1550, Infinity 324 wrote:Titus is a lot better at scum

Yes knowing the players' alignment helps her reads <3

In post 1549, Eggman wrote:I'm not sure who the third mafioso could be, but I'm pretty sure on {DGB, NJAC}.

Fantastic, help me bus my buddy!

In post 1546, NJAC wrote:@Egg and @DGB:

Why are you voting me?

Because you're my buddy and I am bus'ing you.

Eggman's reads are a hot mess and he's my other scum buddy.

@Eggman, why do you think Creature was not lynched D1? Was the NK someone pushing Creature NKed N1?

In post 1549, Eggman wrote:I'm not sure who the third mafioso could be, but I'm pretty sure on {DGB, NJAC}.

Pretty sure? What's your case on DGB that makes you "pretty sure" he's scum?

In post 1550, Infinity 324 wrote:I would like f-oh-ex to explain his reads more, but petroleum, can you explain why what you pointed out is alignment indicative?

Please be more specific with your question.

In post 1548, Eggman wrote: Creature: I don't remember the exact reason for it, but we could try revisiting this lynch from D1?

Are you scumreading Creature? This isn't very clear.

In post 1229, Eggman wrote:

Intent to Hammer: MM4

If he's town, that would reluctantly make me townread Smithereens, who I've had suspicion on all game. If not, hooray.

Do you still agree with this? Also, I don't really get it in the first place. Looking at it now, you seem to have more points against Smithereens then just MM4's defense of him. Why did you believe that MM4 flipping town = town Smithereens?

What do you feel about Creature's play today, and more specifically his thoughts on you?

In post 1559, Derek12 wrote:

@Eggman

In post 1229, Eggman wrote:

Intent to Hammer: MM4

If he's town, that would reluctantly make me townread Smithereens, who I've had suspicion on all game. If not, hooray.

Do you still agree with this? Also, I don't really get it in the first place. Looking at it now, you seem to have more points against Smithereens then just MM4's defense of him. Why did you believe that MM4 flipping town = town Smithereens?

It wouldn't really be a townread now, just a point against my scumread. And to explain the second point, let me apply Smith's own quote: MM4's move was scum insofar as he was scum. If MM4 / NJAC is town, it's just a townie saying they townread this player. If MM4 / NJAC is scum, it's a mafioso defending their buddy.

In post 1556, NJAC wrote:

In post 1549, Eggman wrote:I'm not sure who the third mafioso could be, but I'm pretty sure on {DGB, NJAC}.

Pretty sure? What's your case on DGB that makes you "pretty sure" he's scum?

I wrote a small case on Smithereens. (Totally forgot to look back at DGB, but I will do that right. now.)
Will look through DGB's ISO and reread Day 1 for Titus's question.

In post 1420, DrippingGoofball wrote:

In post 1418, F-oh-ex wrote:On one hand SK will probably try to target Mafia. On the other one, eliminating him would get us rid of one NK.

I get that, but the scum is always more worried about SKs than town.

No one is considering a vig for the second kill?

The first one to bring up a vig, which is what I'm thinking as well.

In post 1436, DrippingGoofball wrote:And, seriously? Two people are voting Creature???

VOTE: crabman

Opposed to the Creature lynch, even when there isn't much threat to it at all. "Randomly" votes our D1 lynch.

In post 1444, DrippingGoofball wrote:Yeah... when I read that I thought they were scum together... but he flipped town.

Scumreading MM4? That could possibly be some small distancing. Or, if she's town, she scumreads MM4 as well. Hmm.

In post 1455, F-oh-ex wrote:ISOing is nigh-worthless if you didn't catch up and don't know the context of situation in which the said posts were made.

There's a button for exactly that; the little white page.

In post 1490, DrippingGoofball wrote:I'm trying by helping lynch MarioManiac.

Yet you haven't said anything attacking MM4.

In post 1504, DrippingGoofball wrote:

In post 1493, Creature wrote:I'd go for atm487, unlike Mario, nothing makes me hesitate to vote him.

I can get behind that.

Getting replaced by a pretty good player is pretty pauseworthy, Creature.

Alright so. What I got from this:
DGB scumreads MM4 / NJAK. I'm in favor of lynching NJAK today, because that lynch would give a little more information about DGB.
Who's my vote even on, anyway..?

EBWOP: NJAC*, sorry. I knew it was a "k" sound, at least.

In post 1555, Titus wrote:@Eggman, why do you think Creature was not lynched D1? Was the NK someone pushing Creature NKed N1?

I don't like having my posts ignored.

You noticed I subbed in.

You quote replied to both DGB and NJAC.

You also ignored Infinity asking about Creature.

Do you not want to talk about Creature, Eggman?

In post 1557, petroleumjelly wrote:

In post 1550, Infinity 324 wrote:I would like f-oh-ex to explain his reads more, but petroleum, can you explain why what you pointed out is alignment indicative?

Please be more specific with your question.

You said f-oh-ex gave weak reasoning for why he scum reads crazy over mario, I don't really see how that is alignment indicative.

I'm also not sure why not vote switching to compromise is scummy, I and a few others did the same thing even though it was clear had to switch. I was really hoping mario would get lynched.

Eggman, what info would a NJAC lynch give you about DGB and why? You don't see very confident that they're scum partners like you claim.

Yeah and answer the question about creature please.

Gut feeling that dragon's and eggman's scum reads on mario aren't busses but mario slot has been independently quite scummy and I think that lynch would give a lot of information. I don't like it when legitimate d1 wagons never go through.

Vote stays on dragon for now, I want to hear NJAC's thoughts but I think that's a very good lynch for today.

Infinity is town

In post 1566, Infinity 324 wrote:You said f-oh-ex gave weak reasoning for why he scum reads crazy over mario, I don't really see how that is alignment indicative.

I'm also not sure why not vote switching to compromise is scummy, I and a few others did the same thing even though it was clear someone had to switch. I was really hoping mario would get lynched.

I don't remember saying it was necessarily alignment indicative. For now I am asking questions. He could be stubborn Town; he could be scum with an agenda.

Creature, you have ignored this question twice. But I find I still want an answer to it. What do you think of Eggman?

In post 1571, petroleumjelly wrote:2.) Creature, you have ignored this question twice. But I find I still want an answer to it. What do you think of Eggman?

Town.

I am also having a gut feeling DotW is town, but not so strong.

Creature, who is scum, I will sheep.