Mafiascum.net

Well wanna vote Rosske then?

It wouldn't surprise me if he just gave up. His play has been so bad i get the feeling he's not even trying.

In post 1545, Thor665 wrote:Yes - that's why I literally said it would in the post you quoted. "then"

Sure dude. It totally does. Like if I spend all of this time attacking somebody, and I don't have a vote on him, it totally changes what I say. What's your point in bringing it up anyways? Are you saying I'm scummy for doing it? If so, how and why?

In post 1545, Thor665 wrote:Yes, I am scumreading you.
I have not indicated my top scumread though.
Are you saying PC is *not* your top scumread?''

Yea atm Phantom is my top scumread.

@Transcend Why is 1536 scummy?

In post 1551, Tenshii wrote:@Transcend Why is 1536 scummy?

This question made me giggle...
Do you realize Transcend posted 1536 and he was calling attention to it?

Yea.....and I'm asking for an explanation

That was the point right? He was using those quotes as a scum case for Rosske?

In post 1554, Tenshii wrote:That was the point right? He was using those quotes as a scum case for Rosske?

Well yeah i thought you were implying that Trascend was saying 1536 was a scum post when he made it himself.

Well I'm back now.
Honestly those quote don't really show Rosskee as scum at all.
Plus really PC is just saying to lynch Giga who is the most townie person there is. He can't be that bad of a townie to not see that.

In post 1517, Rosske wrote:VOTE: Transcend


I know my alignment. Transcend is active lurking, discrediting and manipulating information.

Any chance we'll get you to expound on this?

Wrt PC, I'm in agreement w Thor that he should have been force-replaced a while ago. Overall I feel like it's basically a policy lynch on a willful inactive that has a chance at hitting scum. Anyone want to sell the idea that the case is much more than that?

Replace the slot don't lynch him.

Alternatively: Lynch Rosske watch him flip red and then we don't need a replacement!

Everyone is happy, even the host!

In post 1550, Transcend wrote:Well wanna vote Rosske then?

It wouldn't surprise me if he just gave up. His play has been so bad i get the feeling he's not even trying.

Rosske is on my short list.

In post 1551, Tenshii wrote:Sure dude. It totally does. Like if I spend all of this time attacking somebody, and I don't have a vote on him, it totally changes what I say. What's your point in bringing it up anyways? Are you saying I'm scummy for doing it? If so, how and why?

I've said you're scummy for a few things - pushing someone without voting for them while calling them your top scum read is a prima facie scummy action.

In post 1558, Transcend wrote:Replace the slot don't lynch him.

Alternatively: Lynch Rosske watch him flip red and then we don't need a replacement!

Everyone is happy, even the host!

Lynching PC accomplishes the same thing with the bonus that he flips red.

In post 1559, Thor665 wrote:I've said you're scummy for a few things - pushing someone without voting for them while calling them your top scum read is a prima facie scummy action.

Vote: Phantom Cobalt

If you could explain how that is scummy, then by all means please do.

Sure - for starters, explain to me why town would choose not to vote their top scumread nowhere close to mylo or lylo.

I'll wait.

And the reason scum would do it is due to lack of actual belief in their claims, and also for strategic purposes if they think the move will get them called out.

The day barely started, and there was discussion towards finalizing a townbloc. I didn't see a reason to immediately vote because I assumed that we would've all agreed on a lynch after finalizing said townbloc.

So you're saying scum would act like that to avoid being called out. But isn't there so much to call me out on already? This isn't a case like Karnos's where he tried to do a subtle indirect attack on you by disguising it in the form of asking Giga a question. This is me hard attacking Phantom. AKA you could actually call me out on attacking Phantom because I did do it. The only difference is that I happened to not have put a vote on it.

a vote on it today* I did indeed vote him previous days.

VOTE: PhantomCobalt

l-1 if i'm counting correctly
sorry transcend, rosske's tomorrow if he flips green at the very least

In post 1534, PhantomCobalt wrote:You never poked me

In post 1559, Thor665 wrote:

In post 1550, Transcend wrote:Well wanna vote Rosske then?

It wouldn't surprise me if he just gave up. His play has been so bad i get the feeling he's not even trying.

Rosske is on my short list.

In post 1551, Tenshii wrote:Sure dude. It totally does. Like if I spend all of this time attacking somebody, and I don't have a vote on him, it totally changes what I say. What's your point in bringing it up anyways? Are you saying I'm scummy for doing it? If so, how and why?

I've said you're scummy for a few things - pushing someone without voting for them while calling them your top scum read is a prima facie scummy action.

Vote: Phantom Cobalt

So is this PC-rosske-tenshii for you then?

Anyone want to extend discussion or have a meaningful town read on PC they want to push? It's fairly obvious PC is going to be one of the five lynches we can afford, and Im not particularly opposed to spending it now instead of later.

i've nothing to say

we should wait for transcendentalism and rosske though, I want Rosske to answer Thor's questions about Transcend and Transcend to give thoughts about PC

K. My PoE is basically PC/rosske/tenshii and then go from there. I'm also cool w giving PC time to make a final case for himself and final reads if he has any. Don't want to run the whole 11 days but am fine w running a few more.

i have given thoughts about pc

replace, not lynch.

minimal effort and flaking is NAI plus his d1 struck me as weirdly towny.