Mafiascum.net

In post 1495, REAGAN BUSH 84 wrote:i get the impression flavor leaf isn't easy to sort so i don't know how you're expecting to do it on day 1

In post 1429, REAGAN BUSH 84 wrote:

In post 1423, Gamma Emerald wrote:

In post 1420, REAGAN BUSH 84 wrote:he doesn't need to be more readable lmao

Given I don’t agree (and iirc so do a few others) with ffer’s read there, I disagree with this notion.

the only one i remember suggesting he's scum is cakez and it wasn't much of a serious read. but he's town.

In post 1448, Fermis Flames wrote:

In post 1446, Will catch up later maybe wrote:tammy are you familiar with the game we are playing at all because i am not and could really use your help in figuring out wtf is going on

unfortunately my hydra partner kind of sucks so i'm hoping maybe that we could be friends and you can tell me thoughts and i can pretend they are my ideas all along so that he thinks that i'm bringing something to the table in this partnership

I spent the entire day today reading it if that's what you're asking.

If you're asking about setup, I'm just starting to wrap my head around the setup and how roles work and such. I posted a message at you earlier to see if you thought that some of the mechanics were somewhat similar to this game https://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.php?f=56&t=64547

I'm having a vague recollection of the mechanics of visitation and thought you might have ideas.

your hydra partners attempts to impersonate you suck.

In post 1496, unwnd wrote:When I think about Cakez I feel it's very similar to problems I had with Gamma wherein they just make off-the-cuff posts which don't really seem premeditated. There's about like 4 posts in sequence of SirCakez lamenting his death and still clinging onto what he said before, but that is all very tiresome. What I don't understand (and this question goes out to both Gamma/BM if they are reading this) is that if you're so blindly convinced that the other is scum then why aren't you trying to convince anyone? It just doesn't really do any good sifting ad hominem and the like. I don't read One on Ones thinking 'this person was better in it', definitely not D1 either. I read it like an event happening in the thread and then it's my job to figure out what the event means in the long run

In post 1555, L4pe wrote:do i

have

to backread

In post 1554, SirCakez wrote:What is this in reference to

In post 1556, ManWithNoName wrote:

In post 1555, L4pe wrote:do i

have

to backread

I can't read backwards. I'd front read

In post 1444, REAGAN BUSH 84 wrote:l4pe is scum btw

In post 1447, REAGAN BUSH 84 wrote:

In post 1445, Fermis Flames wrote:

In post 1444, REAGAN BUSH 84 wrote:l4pe is scum btw

Hottake!

What don’t you like about them?

lot of neutral commentary filler type posts when i went bck over the iso and i didn't like the stuff about asking for people to sort, 1288 is pretty empty. i may wake up in the morning and hate this read though who knows

In post 1560, L4pe wrote:oh i found the post

In post 1447, REAGAN BUSH 84 wrote:

In post 1445, Fermis Flames wrote:

In post 1444, REAGAN BUSH 84 wrote:l4pe is scum btw

Hottake!

What don’t you like about them?

lot of neutral commentary filler type posts when i went bck over the iso and i didn't like the stuff about asking for people to sort, 1288 is pretty empty. i may wake up in the morning and hate this read though who knows

i mean fair enough i havent played a game of mafia seriously in a literal year

so

im not used to actually trying as either alignment

In post 1554, SirCakez wrote:

In post 1429, REAGAN BUSH 84 wrote:

In post 1423, Gamma Emerald wrote:

In post 1420, REAGAN BUSH 84 wrote:he doesn't need to be more readable lmao

Given I don’t agree (and iirc so do a few others) with ffer’s read there, I disagree with this notion.

the only one i remember suggesting he's scum is cakez and it wasn't much of a serious read. but he's town.

What is this in reference to

In post 1448, Fermis Flames wrote:

In post 1446, Will catch up later maybe wrote:tammy are you familiar with the game we are playing at all because i am not and could really use your help in figuring out wtf is going on

unfortunately my hydra partner kind of sucks so i'm hoping maybe that we could be friends and you can tell me thoughts and i can pretend they are my ideas all along so that he thinks that i'm bringing something to the table in this partnership

I spent the entire day today reading it if that's what you're asking.

If you're asking about setup, I'm just starting to wrap my head around the setup and how roles work and such. I posted a message at you earlier to see if you thought that some of the mechanics were somewhat similar to this game https://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.php?f=56&t=64547

I'm having a vague recollection of the mechanics of visitation and thought you might have ideas.

your hydra partners attempts to impersonate you suck.

*Not really game relevant but that was the second ever Large Theme I read on this site and it gave me all the nostalgia to see it*

In post 1496, unwnd wrote:When I think about Cakez I feel it's very similar to problems I had with Gamma wherein they just make off-the-cuff posts which don't really seem premeditated. There's about like 4 posts in sequence of SirCakez lamenting his death and still clinging onto what he said before, but that is all very tiresome. What I don't understand (and this question goes out to both Gamma/BM if they are reading this) is that if you're so blindly convinced that the other is scum then why aren't you trying to convince anyone? It just doesn't really do any good sifting ad hominem and the like. I don't read One on Ones thinking 'this person was better in it', definitely not D1 either. I read it like an event happening in the thread and then it's my job to figure out what the event means in the long run

Ok but I don't think Cabd is scum? So I don't know what you're getting at here.

In post 1558, L4pe wrote:

In post 1556, ManWithNoName wrote:

In post 1555, L4pe wrote:do i

have

to backread

I can't read backwards. I'd front read

not going to then

whats new

In post 1514, Gamma Emerald wrote:Ok
I can see that

But I have my own issue, L4pe how is BM’s spamminess not bad? I’ve cooled off on the murderlust but I still think BM isn’t a good influence.

In post 1480, REAGAN BUSH 84 wrote:i should read before posting

In post 1490, Gamma Emerald wrote:

In post 1485, unwnd wrote:Reagan I still disagree about midway, It's pure gut but something don't seem right. You make agreeable posts but I don't see your tenacity yet so I hesitate to townread you.
I think if Firebringer were town even if his shitposting would be more effective, pause for thought
Fermis is a constant presence but I find myself not really reading them, but something tells me they're alright
Dunn made two calls of provocation and everyone ignored it, why
Catching up doesn't ping me despite his posts up until now being mostly the joke
Sort Flavor Leaf now rather than later that is all I ask thanks

Gullotina/l4pe/ManWithNoName/Cobra Kai are all the same to me. I wouldn't doubt some scum being in there.

Huh that wasn't so bad

Yeah systemically going through players ISOs to form reads might not be a bad alternative to basic thread reading
I wonder if Cabd will home in on this post. He should.

In post 1551, Flavor Leaf wrote:

In post 1495, REAGAN BUSH 84 wrote:i get the impression flavor leaf isn't easy to sort so i don't know how you're expecting to do it on day 1