Posted: Tue Apr 27, 2021 4:48 pm
Gross
It was yucky you were like "I cant read ten pages except for this one post against me have an omgus vote "In post 1548, yessiree wrote:But you called me vote yucky and it hurt my feelings
Yeah, I think their eod1 was townie; they handled being wagoned well. Their reads looked genuine to me. Their engagement today has also been strong.In post 1529, VFP wrote:Anyone town reading Dragon here?
We're aiming for scum day 2. What makes Arte and Rob a decent vote to get scum?In post 1556, NDMath wrote:Yeah, I think their eod1 was townie; they handled being wagoned well. Their reads looked genuine to me. Their engagement today has also been strong.
I'd rather elim today somewhere in {Yes, Flea, DMG, Arte, Rob} depending on how day goes. Last three are basically null reads right now, two being absent day1 and DMG just hasn't left much of an impression on me.
Keep in mind I'm going by this post as well.In post 195, NDMath wrote:Jackson explained the most of it.Reads based off activity are generally lazy, and specifically so on a slot that hasn't posted at all (where that reason is very very likely to not be game related.)
Are you saying yessirree is town?In post 1555, Flea The Magician wrote:VOTE: Roberto
Sorry but your votes are literally just as bad as the ones you're attacking.
No, I'm still trying to find my way in the social gamescape. Are you in a rush? Am I so good a player that you're all waiting to sheep me? Or are you scumbags trying to save yessirree?In post 1563, Save The Dragons wrote:robert do you have reads yet
It is absolutely a valid conclusion, if you're going to throw stuff like that around then you better back it up.In post 1562, flow trap wrote:That's not a valid conclusion
Smh, your the one drawing a conclusion on something irrelevantIn post 1565, Robert M Hunter wrote:It is absolutely a valid conclusion, if you're going to throw stuff like that around then you better back it up.In post 1562, flow trap wrote:That's not a valid conclusion
Oh really. How irrelevant is it? Was I hyperbolic when I quoted yessirree's "NO U" post? Absolutely. But it is the highest flame in the scummy dumpster fire that is their iso.In post 1568, flow trap wrote:Smh, your the one drawing a conclusion on something irrelevantIn post 1565, Robert M Hunter wrote:It is absolutely a valid conclusion, if you're going to throw stuff like that around then you better back it up.In post 1562, flow trap wrote:That's not a valid conclusion
Do you consider yourself a smart/clever player?In post 1570, flow trap wrote:I fail to see how you being more scummy than Yes means that Yes is towny?
Also, I've already explained that I don't just defend my TRs and Attack my SRs