Posted: Thu Jun 10, 2021 11:26 am
I guess it's time to call the ex friend for help?
VOTE: Moongrass
VOTE: Moongrass
In post 1543, Gamma Emerald wrote:I'm thinking it's moon/titus/nk15(?)In post 1540, cyrus62 wrote:SO YOU THINK IT COULD BE MOON, NK15 AND NM?In post 1524, Gamma Emerald wrote:As I see it, a viable explanation for House's two thought processes was that he was undecided on which one made more sense. And I don't see how this equates to the example you gave. Both conclusions he gave point to you being scum, they just sort NK15 differentlyIn post 1520, Moongrass wrote:No and that's why I'm saying you're picking which one to agree with in a biased way. It's like if I gave evidence for someone being both innocent and guilty and then the jury picked which one to choose rather than see the evidence is from an unreliable source.In post 1517, Gamma Emerald wrote:Okay, that's on him for giving two contradictory statements. I didn't say I felt he was right about that part, did I?In post 1513, Moongrass wrote:House also said I jumped off NK because he would flip town. Gamma, you're picking a choosing house's posts to confirm your bad read.
THATS WHAT I THINK BUT I WILL RE READ BEFORE I VOTE ANY ONE AND PUT THEM TO L1 OR HAMMER?
why the caps tho?
I find it hilarious that you were buddying & townreading me until I called you scum, and now every other word out of your mouth is how I'm scum all of a sudden.In post 1502, Moongrass wrote:Not a clue, I think a lot of what house has done here can be from either alignment but I'm leaning scum on his behavior around players under pressure in the thread.
Do you think what house has done here would be hard for scum to achieve?
I just wanted to know about that mysterious ex-friend!!!In post 1554, House wrote:I find it hilarious that you were buddying & townreading me until I called you scum, and now every other word out of your mouth is how I'm scum all of a sudden.In post 1502, Moongrass wrote:Not a clue, I think a lot of what house has done here can be from either alignment but I'm leaning scum on his behavior around players under pressure in the thread.
Do you think what house has done here would be hard for scum to achieve?
Way to be subtle.
Quote that post, because I don't recall ever insinuating that NK was town.In post 1513, Moongrass wrote:House also said I jumped off NK because he would flip town. Gamma, you're picking a choosing house's posts to confirm your bad read.
okay now I get why you were saying moon/nk15/nm, that's your readsIn post 1476, cyrus62 wrote:so lets see off of nk15 is mia, myself ,nk15, titus, gamma moon, jjh and nm.
so now lets see out of these who do i think is scum nk15 gamma and nm could be scum together or it could be moon nk15 and nm .
i have to ease up on mastina but they could very well be one as well . but i will give jjh a shot and trust his read on mistina for now.
Maybe you should confirm claims before blindly believing them.In post 1517, Gamma Emerald wrote:Okay, that's on him for giving two contradictory statements. I didn't say I felt he was right about that part, did I?In post 1513, Moongrass wrote:House also said I jumped off NK because he would flip town. Gamma, you're picking a choosing house's posts to confirm your bad read.
yepIn post 1558, Gamma Emerald wrote:okay now I get why you were saying moon/nk15/nm, that's your readsIn post 1476, cyrus62 wrote:so lets see off of nk15 is mia, myself ,nk15, titus, gamma moon, jjh and nm.
so now lets see out of these who do i think is scum nk15 gamma and nm could be scum together or it could be moon nk15 and nm .
i have to ease up on mastina but they could very well be one as well . but i will give jjh a shot and trust his read on mistina for now.
Knowing how someone interacts IRL can help with sorting them imoIn post 1500, Moongrass wrote:Sure, make it personal. This says a lot more about you than me.In post 1496, NorwegianboyEE wrote:Also Moon, do you feel genuinely aggressive IRL whenever someone justs asks you questions about what you say? Surely that can’t be healthy.
Lmfao. Bruh have you watched catfish? Have you read Twitter? Do you even internet?In post 1563, Gamma Emerald wrote:I'd say very few people actively try to act differently online than in person
I've made no secret who my scumreads are.In post 1564, Moongrass wrote:House if I get flipped and you're not on my wagon, that looks very bad for you so this is the point where you should get on.
Actually, I have an OBJECTION! While I didn't actually vote NK15, my first post after my prod dodge was asking about the NK15 wagon's reasoning. I think that could reasonably be construed as looking for a way onto it? I had no content between the time when it was mentioned that an elimination was acceptable and that post I believe, I'll have to double-check.In post 1497, Moongrass wrote:The house and cyrus votes are towny because they are contrary to what's dominating the thread, which shows me that Gamma is playing his own game, supporting much of what I read in his ISO. The fact that he has been voting solo when I think scum are involved in the two main wagons also reads as a non agenda. Contrary to house, gamma is making reads and asking questions objectively. Contrary to house he didn't try to find a way onto a main wagon as soon as you OK'd an elim.
okay there's counterpoints, but what I mean to say is there's probably some aspect of everyone's IRL peronality in how they present themselves online.In post 1565, Moongrass wrote:Lmfao. Bruh have you watched catfish? Have you read Twitter? Do you even internet?In post 1563, Gamma Emerald wrote:I'd say very few people actively try to act differently online than in person
yeah I have to ask why moongrass is talking to an ex friendIn post 1518, nomnomnom wrote:With how this conversation is going I'll never know about this mysterious ex-friend!
So much for mafia being a social experience
I'm actually the kindest person IRL. So it's fun to get a little aggro online.In post 1569, Gamma Emerald wrote:probably some aspect of everyone's IRL peronality in how they present themselves online.
It's useless on Day 1.In post 1308, northsidegal wrote:I disagree that valuable wagon analysis is only possible under imminent threat of death. I think there are plenty of games with plenty of counterexamples that contradict that idea.