Mafiascum.net

In post 1543, Medea the Alien wrote:You two literally bickered identically to this as town-town in said game.

In post 1539, ManateeGal wrote:

In post 1524, unwnd wrote:Manatee would you say you were trying to hype yourself up in a way and trying to make a bigger move than you anticipate?

Meaning, you see all this confusing and layered play from people and you were trying to hone into that yourself

feel like im going back to the underselling thing xd, but yeah i think so. i wanted to ask a question that had consequences and engagements but when you, a player i strongly townread said u didnt understand and it was weird i realized it wasnt as strong as i thought it was

In post 1551, Medea the Alien wrote:Somewhere in a remote survival shelter in fire-swept California, ffery's eyebrows are living above her hairline, while she utters the term "Thread Health"

In post 1555, Annie Edison wrote:UNVOTE:

grumble grumble grumble

In post 1558, Annie Edison wrote:God

I was

so fucking cringe

In post 1546, unwnd wrote:

In post 1544, Snarky Fishes wrote:

In post 1538, unwnd wrote:Yes.

Nope.

This isn't how arguments work, Bell

If you two think I'm scum then feel free to gladiate

In post 1562, Snarky Fishes wrote:

In post 1546, unwnd wrote:

In post 1544, Snarky Fishes wrote:

In post 1538, unwnd wrote:Yes.

Nope.

This isn't how arguments work, Bell

If you two think I'm scum then feel free to gladiate

Give me a definition of coasting and the closest you'll find is that our avatar has water in it.

We went after Medea instantly, and have been present and contenting throughout the game. I have 2 really good town reads that are probably town. I need one more and then I'll try to kill a scum somewhere. We both have a ton of in game posts and basically have something of an opinion on everyone.

I mean, you can suit yourself, I'm not saying you're not allowed to pressure us or what not. You always have that right, but the bar to correctly reading us is really low. So I'm just like, what?

In post 1341, ArcAngel9 wrote:

Lady Lambdadelta

I feel that their inactiveness is an act. She seems on and off but not really contributing much to the game. Post #937 , what is the point of that? And Not a fan of “Right” and “Cross” symbols. I need concrete inputs.

In post 1369, Snarky Fishes wrote:

In post 1358, Here There Be Dragons wrote:

In post 1354, Snarky Fishes wrote:

In post 1350, Here There Be Dragons wrote:

In post 1082, Snarky Fishes wrote:

In post 1080, Medea the Alien wrote:I still feel that it holds valid. I still think there would have been more focus on the shard mechanic, especially pre-nerfbat. It's not like, the towniest townread that ever townread, but it's sufficient to clear Lady Rhea off the list for today, for sure.

That's where I'm at.

i continue to think this take sucks, but for me i guess she's almost off the table day 1 automatically just by virtue of account name. so maybe you're saying the slightest excuse is enough for you to do the same, rather than that this is some incredibly town action?

Is this addressed to me?

It's not a strong reason to hard-townread Rhea, but I do feel like she started the game by intentionally relinquishing some of her strongest tools as a scum player.

It sounds like you disagree with the take although you have her off the table today, too, just based on rep.

it's pointed at both you and medea really.

@line 2: my belief is that she would have decided to play the game this way before receiving her role pm. if i don't believe that then i have to get into some ethical questions that make me uncomfortable.

Probably. And she's no doubt better at making an approach work as scum, and I don't think she'd pick an approach she'd expect to be detrimental to her favorite alignment. Which assumes that Rhea's preferences are similar, and I have no idea if that's a good assumption.

If you had decided to play a minimalist approach before a game was rolled and wound up with a scum role, would you stick with it? Why or why not?

I don't choose a playstyle approach in advance because I never stick with them and always fall back into old (bad? maybe, but the generally work for me) habits. I envy people who can easily tailor their playstyle. The kinds of stuff I decide in advance of going into a game are shaped by my role and thoughts on the setup, and by the player list. And they often fall by the wayside due to the way the game unfolds.

In post 1372, Medea the Alien wrote:

In post 1358, Here There Be Dragons wrote:

In post 1354, Snarky Fishes wrote:

In post 1350, Here There Be Dragons wrote:

In post 1082, Snarky Fishes wrote:

In post 1080, Medea the Alien wrote:I still feel that it holds valid. I still think there would have been more focus on the shard mechanic, especially pre-nerfbat. It's not like, the towniest townread that ever townread, but it's sufficient to clear Lady Rhea off the list for today, for sure.

That's where I'm at.

i continue to think this take sucks, but for me i guess she's almost off the table day 1 automatically just by virtue of account name. so maybe you're saying the slightest excuse is enough for you to do the same, rather than that this is some incredibly town action?

Is this addressed to me?

It's not a strong reason to hard-townread Rhea, but I do feel like she started the game by intentionally relinquishing some of her strongest tools as a scum player.

It sounds like you disagree with the take although you have her off the table today, too, just based on rep.

it's pointed at both you and medea really.

@line 2: my belief is that she would have decided to play the game this way before receiving her role pm. if i don't believe that then i have to get into some ethical questions that make me uncomfortable.

I'm pretty sure there's zero concern of your last line being at play here.

But Lady Rhea COULD have still gone for the tools. It's very clear as we have literally already proved in this thread that communication with said goddess of Fodlan is quite possible, that she would have had zero issue communicating her intents around the shard mechanic.

Basically, we got this:



and not (FE3H SPOILERS) this:

Spoiler:

In post 1384, Here There Be Dragons wrote: spiffeh, can you remind me what your reads are?

In post 1568, Snarky Fishes wrote:I don't recall a monkeyman game?

-Bell.

In post 1569, Snarky Fishes wrote:In my experience, a snarky AA is a town AA.

The snark was awakened, so there's that.

In post 1338, Snarky Fishes wrote:

Spoiler: snarky/luke hood

Hey, want to talk about your reads?

In post 1565, unwnd wrote:

In post 1562, Snarky Fishes wrote:

In post 1546, unwnd wrote:

In post 1544, Snarky Fishes wrote:

In post 1538, unwnd wrote:Yes.

Nope.

This isn't how arguments work, Bell

If you two think I'm scum then feel free to gladiate

Give me a definition of coasting and the closest you'll find is that our avatar has water in it.

We went after Medea instantly, and have been present and contenting throughout the game. I have 2 really good town reads that are probably town. I need one more and then I'll try to kill a scum somewhere. We both have a ton of in game posts and basically have something of an opinion on everyone.

I mean, you can suit yourself, I'm not saying you're not allowed to pressure us or what not. You always have that right, but the bar to correctly reading us is really low. So I'm just like, what?

Is it? You won that game Monkeyman hosted.