Posted: Thu Sep 02, 2021 1:54 am
Enchant has vaguely-scummy words and townie actions. It's the actions that matter more. This is a matter of communication style.
Can I get a TLDR? Haven't taken concentration pills yet todayIn post 1550, Kazyan wrote:Enchant has vaguely-scummy words and townie actions. It's the actions that matter more. This is a matter of communication style.
Something from my notes pile:In post 1551, Dwlee99 wrote:Can I get a TLDR? Haven't taken concentration pills yet todayIn post 1550, Kazyan wrote:Enchant has vaguely-scummy words and townie actions. It's the actions that matter more. This is a matter of communication style.
viewtopic.php?p=12959312#p12959312
This is my #1019, where I stated that I'd claim at E-1. I'm at E-2, here. What happens thereafter is pretty quick--Dwlee and Nathan unvote, and then Enchant publicly goes to bed. Enchant was around shortly before my E-1 promise and shortly thereafter, so it's reasonable to think the Enchant saw this and decided not to pile that E-1 VOTE: ote onto the wagon. This is important, because scum have a serious incentive to get me to claim, but town doesn't want that on Day 1. Enchant looks town, here.
I believe in idea, where you can't blame one particular player. Team game and such.In post 1553, Dwlee99 wrote:You winning that game was an indictment of cult games lol
You stunned me with this.Nathann wrote:I went to check that post out, and me/Dwlee deflated that wagon before Enchant got a chance to post, they never had the opportunity to force the wagon onto Y-1.
@Enchant, what'd your reads looking like?
That's exactly what I did because GMo's so-called crumb was fake AF.In post 1424, Nathann wrote:"not believing GranpaMo's claim, not voting him, but keeping the door open towards voting him"
If Isis is a reviewer that doubles the chances.In post 1426, Nathann wrote:This mod is notorious for putting in red herrings that do nothing and serve no purpose. I'm not clearing anyone for claiming non-confirmable things. I wouldn't be surprised if there's a Mafia Backup Watcher with no Watchers in the game. (I don't think Dwlee is Scum, but as illustration.)In post 1421, GrandpaMo wrote:Then why is Dwlee backup watcher?
This is also town, not scum would interfere a Y-2 wagon.In post 1449, Andresvmb wrote:We’re not executing DGB.
Kazyan is really solvey today, though.In post 1459, Andresvmb wrote:I’m going to take a guess and say that the Scum are all in {Kazyan, Nathann, DW}.
mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmIn post 1477, Andresvmb wrote:And do you think Town softs a PR there, avoids execution, and then doesn’t get NK’ed but Kyouko [VT] does? What does that tell you?
By POE this is increasingly possible.In post 1529, Andresvmb wrote:I do think GMo could easily be Scum actually. I might be letting the ridiculousness of the overall play affect my read of the slot when they’ve clearly done absurdly anti-Town things.
I only say that because of the earlier fake claim. I don’t have any experience with them.In post 1534, geraintm wrote:Does GrandpaMo have form with this?
Talk to me about GMo because I’m really struggling there.In post 1534, geraintm wrote:I think my town lean pile is Andres and GrandpaMo.
Frankly, it’s mostly gut. They were overly confrontational early against me when I started questioning their lack of involvement, which over time just made me question whether Scum reacts like that. I would have expected that they would be more conciliatory or offer out reads, but instead they made jokes about their number of posts.In post 1537, Nathann wrote:@Andres, what's your thoughts on Enchant? I get the idea behind "DGB did this one Townie thing on Day 1", but (I think?) you're Town on Enchant, and I don't see why?