Mafiascum.net

"Putting words in my mouth" my ass dude.

If what you say is true, tomorrow will be a breeze.

In post 1550, Morning Tweet wrote:"Putting words in my mouth" my ass dude.

You did.

I never said it was your fault that you were pissed.

I said you handled it poorly.

If what I say is true, there is no tomorrow, actually

In post 1552, House wrote:

In post 1550, Morning Tweet wrote:"Putting words in my mouth" my ass dude.

You did.

I never said it was your fault that you were pissed.

I said you handled it poorly.

Yes, you are. You're refusing to explain your reads because I'm upset. You're saying it's wrong of me to be upset.

Seriously. It's a dick move.

In post 1553, Morning Tweet wrote:If what I say is true, there is no tomorrow, actually

Nope.

Bingle will flip scum.

Not 8-ball, so we'll be doing this dance again tomorrow.

In post 1554, Morning Tweet wrote:

In post 1552, House wrote:

In post 1550, Morning Tweet wrote:"Putting words in my mouth" my ass dude.

You did.

I never said it was your fault that you were pissed.

I said you handled it poorly.

Yes, you are. You're refusing to explain your reads because I'm upset. You're saying it's wrong of me to be upset.

Seriously. It's a dick move.

I never said it was your fault you were upset.

I said you reacted poorly.

Seriously.

In post 1549, Morning Tweet wrote:

In post 1540, House wrote:Since you want to get pissy with ME when YOU are the one that popped off with attitude in the FIRST place, NO.

Oh, I handled it poorly therefore I'm not deserving of you explaining your reads. My bad.

In post 1557, Morning Tweet wrote:

In post 1549, Morning Tweet wrote:

In post 1540, House wrote:Since you want to get pissy with ME when YOU are the one that popped off with attitude in the FIRST place, NO.

Oh, I handled it poorly therefore I'm not deserving of you explaining your reads. My bad.

Now you're tracking.

UNVOTE: Bingle

Been keeping the unvote queued in preview spamming the preview button between posts to interrupt a possible quick hammer, but if S_S is VLA & scum, that isn't likely to happen any time soon.

Yes, including during "dinnertime".

I never went afk.

VOTE: Bingle

Sorry for getting so pissy. My bad, mate. I'd much rather play this phase like this.

pedit: Close one, dude. I had the ragequit lined up

UNVOTE:

But yes, there's no reason to try and gamble on interrupting a quick hammer when imagine is never around and SS is on V/LA. You'd have to monitor the thread for probably days

I'm definitely taking a break from this one. I am (seriously) sorry for getting so upset but I was looking forward to trying to solve once and for all and found it somewhat unbelievable you would gamble the game on your own reads right after being wrong on TW.

In post 1561, Morning Tweet wrote:VOTE: Bingle

Sorry for getting so pissy. My bad, mate. I'd much rather play this phase like this.

pedit: Close one, dude. I had the ragequit lined up

UNVOTE:

Don't get so fussed about my actions.

I always have an agenda, regardless of alignment.

In post 1563, Morning Tweet wrote:I'm definitely taking a break from this one. I am (seriously) sorry for getting so upset but I was looking forward to trying to solve once and for all and found it somewhat unbelievable you would gamble the game on your own reads right after being wrong on TW.

I wasn't. That's why I was giving myself arthritis spamming preview, lol.

I didn't really see "monitoring the thread to try and attempt to stop a quickhammer from essentially two V/LA players for potentially days on end" as a particularly likely scenario

But yeah, sorry about that

Besides, you can't really do much solving when half the players aren't even here to solve.

Omg what is all this?

I'm out with my daughter and her cousin at the moment, this is my first time checking this thread since daystart.
More substantive posts from me in a couple of hours... assuming no one quick hammers anyone before then... -eye roll-

As of right now I still think Bingle's scum and fully plan to vote him but House's early vote was super bad.

My money is still on Bingle-SS. I don't know if all this means I should consider Bingle-House too... At the outside it could be an attempt by House to make Bingle seem town when no one quick hammers?

You're good, MT.

I'm sorry I pissed you off, I just didn't know how to tell you what I was doing without also telling scum.

In post 1569, imaginality wrote:Omg what is all this?

I'm out with my daughter and her cousin at the moment, this is my first time checking this thread since daystart.
More substantive posts from me in a couple of hours... assuming no one quick hammers anyone before then... -eye roll-

As of right now I still think Bingle's scum and fully plan to vote him but House's early vote was super bad.

My money is still on Bingle-SS. I don't know if all this means I should consider Bingle-House too... At the outside it could be an attempt by House to make Bingle seem town when no one quick hammers?

If I'm trying to make him seem town, why do I still scumread him, o wise one?

Tinfoil:

I unvoted just as MT was about to start the quick hammer.

When imaginality saw the wagon was gone, he did that ^ but would have voted if the wagon had been at 2.

MT is back in the game, after all.

In post 1572, House wrote:Tinfoil:

I unvoted just as MT was about to start the quick hammer.

When imaginality saw the wagon was gone, he did that ^ but would have voted if the wagon had been at 2.

MT is back in the game, after all

.

What does the bolded mean?

In post 1573, imaginality wrote:

In post 1572, House wrote:Tinfoil:

I unvoted just as MT was about to start the quick hammer.

When imaginality saw the wagon was gone, he did that ^ but would have voted if the wagon had been at 2.

MT is back in the game, after all

.

What does the bolded mean?

I had her written off as town prior to the tinfoil.