Mafiascum.net

So you think nati would put two vigs in a game?


..oh actually I kinda do. Either way, dayvig claim is testable.

Deadline: 7 days, 7 hours, 7 minutes


Fuck yeah, lucky time.

In post 1564, Bert wrote:

In post 1560, MafiaSSK wrote:Guess fucking what Bert? I didn't post because there were a few votes on me. I posted because it was nearing yet another 48 hours and I hadn't posted. So I posted.

^scum manifesto so why are you lurking then after what you tried to do D1. what happened to "stepping it up because it's Nat's game"

Oh wait, that was just soap scum hmm?

BECAUSE OF FUCKING REAL LIFE. I STARTED LURKING IN ALL OF MY DAMN GAMES.
Fine, fuck it, lurking can be alignment indicative sometimes. But not for me. And definitely not here.
SO FUCKING STOP WITH YOUR SHITTY REASONING.

And no Cabd, I'm not claiming.

In post 1576, Cabd wrote:So you think nati would put two vigs in a game?


..oh actually I kinda do. Either way, dayvig claim is testable.

I do. Question is how it's balanced.

I also think the way he claimed it looks pretty genuine.

I'm not a dayvig

Simply wishful thinking.

...Then don't fucking claim something liable to get you shot at.

welp.

If you ever are (or want to fake it) claim that way again.

In post 1582, Cabd wrote:...Then don't fucking claim something liable to get you shot at.

Maybe I wanted to be shot at.

SSK, if you're not claiming, no blaming me day 3 when you're a bodybag.

In post 1585, Cabd wrote:SSK, if you're not claiming, no blaming me day 3 when you're a bodybag.

I understood the implications Cabd. I feel it's better for me to not claim here.

In post 1569, Selkies wrote:

In post 1562, Bert wrote:wow what enthusiasm. and so do you believe him or not??????????????

Are you kidding? I'm smug as hell and Orcinus is going to eat crow. I told him on day 1 that Cabd was crumbing vig.

Also 1466. There was a reason I was calling it a gambit.

oh ok so you think it's just a gambit. got it

oh and does SSK freak out like this often

In post 1584, Aronis wrote:

In post 1582, Cabd wrote:...Then don't fucking claim something liable to get you shot at.

Maybe I wanted to be shot at.

If you don't want to play, then say so. I'm usually against replace-outs as a rule, but if you don't wish to play towards your wincondition of NOT being dead, so be it.

In post 1587, Bert wrote:

In post 1569, Selkies wrote:

In post 1562, Bert wrote:wow what enthusiasm. and so do you believe him or not??????????????

Are you kidding? I'm smug as hell and Orcinus is going to eat crow. I told him on day 1 that Cabd was crumbing vig.

Also 1466. There was a reason I was calling it a gambit.

oh ok so you think it's just a gambit. got it

oh and does SSK freak out like this often

I don't really. I just don't see how after however many games I've played here how people still see me lurking (or not) as a tell. I just don't get it. And it's just started to piss me off.

In post 1588, Cabd wrote:

In post 1584, Aronis wrote:

In post 1582, Cabd wrote:...Then don't fucking claim something liable to get you shot at.

Maybe I wanted to be shot at.

If you don't want to play, then say so. I'm usually against replace-outs as a rule, but if you don't wish to play towards your wincondition of NOT being dead, so be it.

Cabd, he's joking.

wow well it feels fake dude

but it's that you tried so hard in the beginning that was weird too

also nacho agreed with my reason that you cared about how u were perceived in the beginning of the game and really went at it (that has nothin to do with lurking)....but you are asking me this, hmmm doesn't that feel weird to you huh

it shouldnt piss you off so easily because youre gonna be lynchbait when you expect us to accommodate your lurky scummy lurking ways

In post 1477, Nachomamma8 wrote:i mean, i can see why being more active directly results in better play for him as scum (harder to lynch).
but i'm not sure he thinks higher activity will make him play better as town, if that makes sense.

In post 1406, Nachomamma8 wrote:EXACTLY
a lurkfuck is a lurkfuck because a lurkfuck doesn't give a shit about looking town
that's why they're a lurkfuck
when a lurkfuck starts posting up a storm, it shows they have ulterior motives: especially when said lurkfuck has been on site as long as SSK has and has had an established playstyle for that long

i think last time when when a lurkfuck stopped lurkfucking empking was lyncher trying to lynch tammy

owned

In post 1587, Bert wrote:

In post 1569, Selkies wrote:

In post 1562, Bert wrote:wow what enthusiasm. and so do you believe him or not??????????????

Are you kidding? I'm smug as hell and Orcinus is going to eat crow. I told him on day 1 that Cabd was crumbing vig.

Also 1466. There was a reason I was calling it a gambit.

oh ok so you think it's just a gambit. got it

oh and does SSK freak out like this often

I'm not saying whether I think it's a gambit or not. it was a nice opportunity to say I thought it was a gambit.

Don't most of us have Selkies as a scumread or wanting to policylynch Katsuki? Why not lynch one of them and give SSK another chance? Then tomorrow analyze the situation and lynch him, if you still consider him scum. He gave me town vibes at first and he appears to be more active now.

In post 1591, Bert wrote:wow well it feels fake dude

but it's that you tried so hard in the beginning that was weird too

also nacho agreed with my reason that you cared about how u were perceived in the beginning of the game and really went at it (that has nothin to do with lurking)....but you are asking me this, hmmm doesn't that feel weird to you huh

it shouldnt piss you off so easily because youre gonna be lynchbait when you expect us to accommodate your lurky scummy lurking ways

That's great. I'm glad, sincerely happy, that my actual anger feels fake to you.

But maybe you haven't been actually looking at the posts but only at the caps. I tried hard at the beginning because if there was one game where I wanted to not lurk it would be this game. This Nat modded game. And if you do only read caps then read this, BUT NONE OF THAT MATTERS.

Lurking isn't a scumtell. Sure it might be sort of anti-town. But it's definitely not to the extent that I'm automatic lynchbait. I always respond. I always give reads. I always try.

So stop trying to use lurking as a valid tell and grow up and make up your own reasoning.

idk ive never seen SSK just freak out after sitting around and deserving it, p sure in 1523 viscon at the end of d1 where he had lots of attention that he didnt go paranoia flake like this

meh. he is overcompensating with noise and deflections for his own absences. he also doesnt seem to be gaining any influence or doing anything else other than being defensive about himself. all of his communication is faltering and nothing else.

also explanation is like "omg stop wasting my energy by calling me out for lurking" - that's a misrep cos that's not the whole case on him lolz

P-edit: it's not just lurking that's a scumtell, love

In post 1595, MafiaSSK wrote:Lurking isn't a scumtell. Sure it might be sort of anti-town. But it's definitely not to the extent that I'm automatic lynchbait.

I always respond. I always give reads. I always try.

So stop trying to use lurking as a valid tell

and grow up and make up your own reasoning.

uh huh, you are totally giving reads and trying today [sarcasm]

and misrep cos read nacho's case - it's NOT just the lurking

In post 1406, Nachomamma8 wrote:EXACTLY
a lurkfuck is a lurkfuck because a lurkfuck doesn't give a shit about looking town
that's why they're a lurkfuck

when a lurkfuck starts posting up a storm, it shows they have ulterior motives: especially when said lurkfuck has been on site as long as SSK has and has had an established playstyle for that long

Read in fine print, SSK. Then tell me that you can't trace back to its origin in context lol

In post 1596, Bert wrote:idk ive never seen SSK just freak out after sitting around and deserving it, p sure in 1523 viscon at the end of d1 where he had lots of attention that he didnt go paranoia flake like this

You do realize how little I cared about that game right?

In post 1596, Bert wrote:meh. he is overcompensating with noise and deflections for his own absences. he also doesnt seem to be gaining any influence or doing anything else other than being defensive about himself. all of his communication is faltering and nothing else.

No dude. I'm defending myself. And don't talk about being deflective, you still haven't given further explanation for your reads.

In post 1596, Bert wrote:also explanation is like "omg stop wasting my energy by calling me out for lurking" - that's a misrep cos that's not the whole case on him lolz

Except it pretty much is lolz. Lurking is the main point of the case. Everything else are pretty much all impacts stemming from it. Feel free to point out what's not though.

In post 1596, Bert wrote:

In post 1595, MafiaSSK wrote:Lurking isn't a scumtell. Sure it might be sort of anti-town. But it's definitely not to the extent that I'm automatic lynchbait.

I always respond. I always give reads. I always try.

So stop trying to use lurking as a valid tell

and grow up and make up your own reasoning.

uh huh, you are totally giving reads and trying today [sarcasm]

Way to strawman dude. Not only have I given plenty of reads all over the game, because you know the game isn't just Day 2, but you sidestep my argument of how lurking isn't a tell.
So do you wanna tell me how lurking is a tell? Or do you agree with me that it isn't?

In post 1596, Bert wrote:and misrep cos read nacho's case - it's NOT just the lurking

And if it isn't, are you sheeping Nacho's case which all stems from me being a "lurkyfuck"?

Wow.

Who are your scumreads, SSK?