You're adding in the word 'genuine' yourself. Functionally all he said was 'you appear to be willing to do anything to get anyone you have expressed suspicion on lynched'. He then immediately followed that commenting with asking why you targeted a claimed lesser scum read rather than a larger scumread. He was suggesting you were being fake, now maybe he thought you were genuine town who was fakeclaiming, but, again, maybe he thought you were un-genuine scum who was fakeclaiming. I personally can't say which it was, though maybe there are some clues within his commentary as regards you in other posts around that one, but I do think you're over working the tell when expressing why you think it's a scumtell as opposed to a scumhunting (or, faked scumhunting, if you wish) tell.In post 1555, Antihero wrote:having genuine suspicion requires a town role PM.In post 1352, Aj The Epic wrote:Anti, since your claiming a blocker role, why SHOULD we believe this is any more than a ploy to get him lynched?All I've gotten from you so far is you'll do anything you can to get the people you have the slightest suspicion on lynched.Why wouldn't you have RB'd me or Kdub, the two you were vehemently against?
that wording just gives me the gut feeling that he was fishing for a retraction (especially given thecontext; muffinman already suggested that he thought i was just gambiting).
i don't know, you could be right and i'm just not being objective about it, that's just what i see in the rorschach blot of the post
@Mac - why is Muffin town?