Mafiascum.net

*She

I’m sorry Skitter. Idk why I’m having trouble with your gender. And I know that’s bad and I’m sorry.

also..... a mislynch failed so you steered momentum onto another mislynch......?

round of applause, please people

In post 1559, the worst wrote:

In post 1554, Pink Ball wrote:Could you full claim at least?

why would I do that......

'Cause you're getting lynched?

Btw you said you didn't get the case on you: I'm voting you for pocketing Nibbui since the begining and continued to do it until the end; because you voted mastina instead of lolwagons because there was some momentum for building that wagon instead of your stated biggest scumread; because your read evolution on mastina makes no sense at all, since you stated she was towntelling, and after she became your counterwagon she became "obvscum"; 'cause your interactions with players like skitter and sheep looks fake in order to make them look bad if you flip scum; because of trying to get towncred after Nancy spewing towniness; and because, basically, your whole ISO looks scummier than anyone else does.

In post 1568, the worst wrote:

In post 1566, Nibbui wrote:duck

from what I know of you, and I know it isn't much, your first priority here would be to not get you lynched, ever, even if it meant you being the nightkill, and then after that going to push your scum reads for the lynch today

I'm trying to revalueate you every second but this just doesn't match nicely

yeah?
wait what?

you're not as much as trying to not get yourself lynched as you are throwing the throw even though you're supposedly confirmable town role

I've a weird point that you can still be town here since I think you would have simply claimed cop for example as scum to try to out any cops here

it doesn't make sense what you are doing though

In post 1576, the worst wrote:also..... a mislynch failed so you steered momentum onto another mislynch......?

round of applause, please people

Jesus Christ you literally can’t talk about the topic at hand.

This is textbook scumplay.

I’m trying to talk about how you were framing my contributions as retroactive and not proactive and you use your response to just try to posture yourself as town instead of directly addressing the issue.

In post 1577, Pink Ball wrote:

In post 1559, the worst wrote:

In post 1554, Pink Ball wrote:Could you full claim at least?

why would I do that......

'Cause you're getting lynched?

Btw you said you didn't get the case on you: I'm voting you for pocketing Nibbui since the begining and continued to do it until the end; because you voted mastina instead of lolwagons because there was some momentum for building that wagon instead of your stated biggest scumread; because your read evolution on mastina makes no sense at all, since you stated she was towntelling, and after she became your counterwagon she became "obvscum"; 'cause your interactions with players like skitter and sheep looks fake in order to make them look bad if you flip scum; because of trying to get towncred after Nancy spewing towniness; and because, basically, your whole ISO looks scummier than anyone else does.

if you lynch scum I will be comfirmable by endgame.
claiming my role only gives wolf manipulative roles a way to mess with that. on the contrary I'd rather have them waste investivagives on me.

if you trust me I don't need to fullclaim.. if you don't trust me my fullclaim does nothing.

In post 1579, LolWagons wrote:

In post 1576, the worst wrote:also..... a mislynch failed so you steered momentum onto another mislynch......?

round of applause, please people

Jesus Christ you literally can’t talk about the topic at hand.

This is textbook scumplay.

I’m trying to talk about how you were framing my contributions as retroactive and not proactive and you use your response to just try to posture yourself as town instead of directly addressing the issue.

Try: you are positioning me for a mislynch and making NO SENSE. respond to my pagebotton post.

In post 1578, Nibbui wrote:

In post 1568, the worst wrote:

In post 1566, Nibbui wrote:duck

from what I know of you, and I know it isn't much, your first priority here would be to not get you lynched, ever, even if it meant you being the nightkill, and then after that going to push your scum reads for the lynch today

I'm trying to revalueate you every second but this just doesn't match nicely

yeah?
wait what?

you're not as much as trying to not get yourself lynched as you are throwing the throw even though you're supposedly confirmable town role

I've a weird point that you can still be town here since I think you would have simply claimed cop for example as scum to try to out any cops here

it doesn't make sense what you are doing though

Trying to be alive for this day suggests that he could be an important scum PR

In post 1577, Pink Ball wrote:

In post 1559, the worst wrote:

In post 1554, Pink Ball wrote:Could you full claim at least?

why would I do that......

'Cause you're getting lynched?

Btw you said you didn't get the case on you: I'm voting you for pocketing Nibbui since the begining and continued to do it until the end; because you voted mastina instead of lolwagons because there was some momentum for building that wagon instead of your stated biggest scumread; because your read evolution on mastina makes no sense at all, since you stated she was towntelling, and after she became your counterwagon she became "obvscum"; 'cause your interactions with players like skitter and sheep looks fake in order to make them look bad if you flip scum; because of trying to get towncred after Nancy spewing towniness; and because, basically, your whole ISO looks scummier than anyone else does.

her reading me wrong is town indicative. her waffling and pushing an agenda this hard at the expense of making sense is 100% wolf.

In post 1580, the worst wrote: if you trust me I don't need to fullclaim.. if you don't trust me my fullclaim does nothing.

Yeah, you're right.

-> you have a bunch of bad posts (pl, nancy intent to hammer, filthy) that feel wrong
-> you feel fake-bravado-y. insinuating that you may be nk'd tonight is ridiculously out of touch with the gamestate given that you aren't obvtown by any means and multiple people are saying they'd like to lynch you; i believe you know that you prob aren't getting nk'd tonight so that felt fake and like an attempt to portray confidence in your towniness when you're not being percieved that way

^That is skitter’s case without the meta piece

It makes PERFECT SENSE WITHOUT THE META PIECE

And just because she used the word “feel” doesn’t invalidate the points being made. Once again instead of being transparent with your reasoning on why you did these things you are shifting to a semantics argument.

In post 1578, Nibbui wrote:

In post 1568, the worst wrote:

In post 1566, Nibbui wrote:duck

from what I know of you, and I know it isn't much, your first priority here would be to not get you lynched, ever, even if it meant you being the nightkill, and then after that going to push your scum reads for the lynch today

I'm trying to revalueate you every second but this just doesn't match nicely

yeah?
wait what?

you're not as much as trying to not get yourself lynched as you are throwing the throw even though you're supposedly confirmable town role

I've a weird point that you can still be town here since I think you would have simply claimed cop for example as scum to try to out any cops here

it doesn't make sense what you are doing though

I don't want to be lynched because it's mechanically bad. I'm trying to PoE scum because my actual wincon is lynching scum, not avoiding my lynch.

I'm not entirely sure I'm following what your issue is with what I'm doing, could you elaborate a bit on what makes my combination of survivalist / scumhunting or shadethrowing play decisively scum indicative to you?

In post 1581, the worst wrote:

In post 1579, LolWagons wrote:

In post 1576, the worst wrote:also..... a mislynch failed so you steered momentum onto another mislynch......?

round of applause, please people

Jesus Christ you literally can’t talk about the topic at hand.

This is textbook scumplay.

I’m trying to talk about how you were framing my contributions as retroactive and not proactive and you use your response to just try to posture yourself as town instead of directly addressing the issue.

Try: you are positioning me for a mislynch and making NO SENSE. respond to my pagebotton post.

Still. Not. Addressing. The. Issue. Still. Subtle. Posturing.

In post 1583, the worst wrote: her reading me wrong is town indicative. her waffling and pushing an agenda this hard at the expense of making sense is 100% wolf.

She pushed that agenda since the begining. She wanted to voted podoboq but you suggested the cross vote

I'm pretty sure that the NK thing was sarcasm regardless of his alignment

Why should I have to fill a demand to respond to a post before you answer me? As town here wouldn’t you be happily transparent?

In post 1585, LolWagons wrote:-> you have a bunch of bad posts (pl, nancy intent to hammer, filthy) that feel wrong
-> you feel fake-bravado-y. insinuating that you may be nk'd tonight is ridiculously out of touch with the gamestate given that you aren't obvtown by any means and multiple people are saying they'd like to lynch you; i believe you know that you prob aren't getting nk'd tonight so that felt fake and like an attempt to portray confidence in your towniness when you're not being percieved that way

^That is skitter’s case without the meta piece

It makes PERFECT SENSE WITHOUT THE META PIECE

And just because she used the word “feel” doesn’t invalidate the points being made. Once again instead of being transparent with your reasoning on why you did these things you are shifting to a semantics argument.

OK let's remove meta from this.

1) I used strange turn of phrase. I suggested lynching my nullscum reads. I gave intent to hammer to draw a reaction out of a player who I KNOW gives alignment indicative reactions when put under pressure.
2) I have a personality and am acting bravadoey. I made a joke about being n1'd.

you're quoting a LITERAL META CASE and saying you hate meta and that it's ingame logic. it's completely rhetorically biased by the fact skitter has meta knowledge of me. the fact you're not seeing this is tragic at best and scumclaiming at worst.

In post 1589, Nibbui wrote:I'm pretty sure that the NK thing was sarcasm regardless of his alignment

Nibbui gets me :<

In post 1592, the worst wrote:

In post 1589, Nibbui wrote:I'm pretty sure that the NK thing was sarcasm regardless of his alignment

Nibbui gets me :<

You’ve had multiple chances to say it was a joke but you couldn’t come up with that answer on your own?

In post 1586, the worst wrote:

In post 1578, Nibbui wrote:

In post 1568, the worst wrote:

In post 1566, Nibbui wrote:duck

from what I know of you, and I know it isn't much, your first priority here would be to not get you lynched, ever, even if it meant you being the nightkill, and then after that going to push your scum reads for the lynch today

I'm trying to revalueate you every second but this just doesn't match nicely

yeah?
wait what?

you're not as much as trying to not get yourself lynched as you are throwing the throw even though you're supposedly confirmable town role

I've a weird point that you can still be town here since I think you would have simply claimed cop for example as scum to try to out any cops here

it doesn't make sense what you are doing though

I don't want to be lynched because it's mechanically bad. I'm trying to PoE scum because my actual wincon is lynching scum, not avoiding my lynch.

I'm not entirely sure I'm following what your issue is with what I'm doing, could you elaborate a bit on what makes my combination of survivalist / scumhunting or shadethrowing play decisively scum indicative to you?

I don't have a problem with you being survivalistic

I have a problem with you not being survivalistic when you are a confirmable town PR and you think that there is obvious scum to be lynched

town!duck puts a lot of importance on power roles and we are on a micro where there's probably not many of them

I expected you to be a lot more decisive on the stance "I'm not fucking getting lynched today, ever."

In post 1587, LolWagons wrote:

In post 1581, the worst wrote:

In post 1579, LolWagons wrote:

In post 1576, the worst wrote:also..... a mislynch failed so you steered momentum onto another mislynch......?

round of applause, please people

Jesus Christ you literally can’t talk about the topic at hand.

This is textbook scumplay.

I’m trying to talk about how you were framing my contributions as retroactive and not proactive and you use your response to just try to posture yourself as town instead of directly addressing the issue.

Try: you are positioning me for a mislynch and making NO SENSE. respond to my pagebotton post.

Still. Not. Addressing. The. Issue. Still. Subtle. Posturing.

pagebotton post is the continuation of our conversation. everything else were talking about is mud flinging. please comment on which parts of the case you find alignment indicative when you remove meta. or maybe write up why YOU think I'm scum! wow

In post 1590, LolWagons wrote:Why should I have to fill a demand to respond to a post before you answer me? As town here wouldn’t you be happily transparent?

I keep responding to you but I think we're screaming at each other for no reason rather than continuing a valid conversation

In post 1593, LolWagons wrote:

In post 1592, the worst wrote:

In post 1589, Nibbui wrote:I'm pretty sure that the NK thing was sarcasm regardless of his alignment

Nibbui gets me :<

You’ve had multiple chances to say it was a joke but you couldn’t come up with that answer on your own?

lol
sweaty please

In post 1591, the worst wrote:

In post 1585, LolWagons wrote:-> you have a bunch of bad posts (pl, nancy intent to hammer, filthy) that feel wrong
-> you feel fake-bravado-y. insinuating that you may be nk'd tonight is ridiculously out of touch with the gamestate given that you aren't obvtown by any means and multiple people are saying they'd like to lynch you; i believe you know that you prob aren't getting nk'd tonight so that felt fake and like an attempt to portray confidence in your towniness when you're not being percieved that way

^That is skitter’s case without the meta piece

It makes PERFECT SENSE WITHOUT THE META PIECE

And just because she used the word “feel” doesn’t invalidate the points being made. Once again instead of being transparent with your reasoning on why you did these things you are shifting to a semantics argument.

OK let's remove meta from this.

1) I used strange turn of phrase. I suggested lynching my nullscum reads. I gave intent to hammer to draw a reaction out of a player who I KNOW gives alignment indicative reactions when put under pressure.
2) I have a personality and am acting bravadoey. I made a joke about being n1'd.

you're quoting a LITERAL META CASE and saying you hate meta and that it's ingame logic. it's completely rhetorically biased by the fact skitter has meta knowledge of me. the fact you're not seeing this is tragic at best and scumclaiming at worst.

But without the context of that meta I still agree with those points and think they are all strong enough to stand on their own.

In post 1594, Nibbui wrote:I don't have a problem with you being survivalistic

I have a problem with you not being survivalistic when you are a confirmable town PR and you think that there is obvious scum to be lynched

town!duck puts a lot of importance on power roles and we are on a micro where there's probably not many of them

I expected you to be a lot more decisive on the stance "I'm not fucking getting lynched today, ever."

1) I am eh towards power roles but as you know I'm secretly reasonably good at mechanics but that is also a mild scumtell for me

2) what do you think my current posting is? I'm L-1 with intent. wtf else am I meant to do?