Mafiascum.net

was vizzy wagoned?

Hi sorry, prod received; will catch up soon!

In post 1486, Espeonage wrote:

Detective Pikachu replaces Non lmh

hi

In post 1505, bob3141 wrote:

In post 1479, Invisibility wrote:I think looker is town

so you think looker is town but what does that make you think of those who were voting for him

there’s probably scum on her

I think pikachu is town so far

pikachu are you pulling the wool over my eyes

Pikachu how much/how closely have you read?

VOTE: joges unless someone can tell me why Kanna’s bad

In post 1574, Detective Pikachu wrote:Ahh yeah the rule of three rebuttal

I was wondering about that but for me I think nomnom likes to play wolfy so I think she set up a fake rule of three to skew things (i.e. all town poe of 3). Although she can also power bus so it's like, you never really know.

Do you think vizzy is scummy independent of associatives?

Looking through Salamence's posts they were also going hard on Invis, but they were also accusing Wimpy as well. I forgot Wimpy (Ank) was the one saying they were not worried about mislynching which is possibly why Salamence was hoping on a wagon for them. Thinking about it, I'm not sure if Scum would come out and say that, suppose it depends on how brave their are at making themselves bait for saying it. However both Salamence and Nom were both going on Invis. Starting to feel there is more there and that the rule of 3 is involved here.

I'm not really 100% off of Ank, reminding self of some of Wimpys posts have pulled me away slightly.

VOTE: Invisibility

Currently feel most confident about Joges and Looker being Town

Pikachu have you played with you or another account of yours before?

In post 1583, Gjt wrote:

In post 1574, Detective Pikachu wrote:Ahh yeah the rule of three rebuttal

I was wondering about that but for me I think nomnom likes to play wolfy so I think she set up a fake rule of three to skew things (i.e. all town poe of 3). Although she can also power bus so it's like, you never really know.

Do you think vizzy is scummy independent of associatives?

Looking through Salamence's posts they were also going hard on Invis, but they were also accusing Wimpy as well. I forgot Wimpy (Ank) was the one saying they were not worried about mislynching which is possibly why Salamence was hoping on a wagon for them. Thinking about it, I'm not sure if Scum would come out and say that, suppose it depends on how brave their are at making themselves bait for saying it. However both Salamence and Nom were both going on Invis. Starting to feel there is more there and that the rule of 3 is involved here.

I'm not really 100% off of Ank, reminding self of some of Wimpys posts have pulled me away slightly.

VOTE: Invisibility

Currently feel most confident about Joges and Looker being Town

am I scummy independent of associatives? what is your opinion of the possibility that I was seen as an easy lynch by nom?

I think so. Were you in rc's story revisited upick a few years back?

In post 1580, Ankamius wrote:pikachu are you pulling the wool over my eyes

No, I used a kfc bucket

In post 1581, Invisibility wrote:Pikachu how much/how closely have you read?

I've skimmed isos for the people that I wasn't inclined to townread off associatives

Ok I’m caught up and I’m glad people are finally looking at Rex. Still don’t think Ank is scum because Wimpy was pretty town. Invisibility probably not because I don’t think Sala/nomnom would both push for him based on little reason. I still kind of buy Gjt’s PR claim

@people who are TRing Looker; why?

P.S; hi pikachu!

In post 1589, Kanna wrote:@people who are TRing Looker; why?

I personally feel the exchanges between Looker and Nom was way too off to be 2 Scum. I feel if they were both Scum that exchange would have happened in The Scum PT. I maybe wrong. Also that aside I just haven't picked up a Scum Vibe on Looker

In post 516, Wimpy wrote:

In post 508, Kanna wrote:Still think that’s a bad reason but maybe it’s common to take it that way?^

It is a bad reason. Everyone who used it is an idiot. So that’s like half the game. So I’m fine being the mislynch. This is supposed to be a team game but there’s like 4/5 people who I won’t be able to work with so me dying is better than me being frustrated.

I at least called it. Flavor did exactly what I said he was going to do. At first he didn’t but that was for show since I called him out on it.

@flavor. I didn’t try to discredit you btw. I merely spoke the truth. Truth hurts sometimes but that’s your own fault.

Joges or Rex are who I think are scum. I’m vt.

Good luck town.

In post 1074, Ankamius wrote:don't worry I'm a PR too

I missed that one from Ank, maybe that's why was so against confirming what Wimpy said

In post 1552, Ankamius wrote:VOTE: Gjt

So ank why do you still want to have gjt lynched today just liek yesterday when you choose gjt over nom. Although you were claiming a town read on nom at that time. And you did for 8 hours push an alterntaive lynch. But you vote was only on kanna for 8 hours and you quickly returned to gjt a claimed pr. When i think there was 2 days to go. as nom was lycnhed i think aroudn 30 hours to deadline


As were already down one town pr why do you think its a good idea to risk lynching a claimed pr. There is certainly one thing not wanting to take that slot to lylo but entirely different to want to lynch that slot when we still 3 mislynchs at worst from lylo. So why do you want to lynch him before he has a chance to get at least 2 night actions. And if we manage to lynch the second scum today or the next. Then he as then at minimum two chances to get a guilty or one clear.

If gjt is a town watcher we could certainly do with his pr after losing our watcher. His role today even sort of fits with nicks flip.

I don't care about PRs

In post 1583, Gjt wrote:

In post 1574, Detective Pikachu wrote:Ahh yeah the rule of three rebuttal

I was wondering about that but for me I think nomnom likes to play wolfy so I think she set up a fake rule of three to skew things (i.e. all town poe of 3). Although she can also power bus so it's like, you never really know.

Do you think vizzy is scummy independent of associatives?

Looking through Salamence's posts they were also going hard on Invis, but they were also accusing Wimpy as well. I forgot Wimpy (Ank) was the one saying they were not worried about mislynching which is possibly why Salamence was hoping on a wagon for them. Thinking about it, I'm not sure if Scum would come out and say that, suppose it depends on how brave their are at making themselves bait for saying it. However both Salamence and Nom were both going on Invis. Starting to feel there is more there and that the rule of 3 is involved here.

I'm not really 100% off of Ank, reminding self of some of Wimpys posts have pulled me away slightly.

VOTE: Invisibility

Currently feel most confident about Joges and Looker being Town

This is why I want to kill GJT.

Says Ank vs FL is TvS, but doesn’t know where, I give the opportunity to help him, then he pivots.

I’m happy pushing Ankamius, and I think GJT could be a partner

Wimpy was not pretty town. Wimpy was pretty scum.

Just like I caught Nomnom that day, I caught Wimpy there too.

And they both replaced out. Scum replace out when I push them. It’s annoying. Kuribo did the same thing in Mafia a la mode, and that’s a similar playstyle to Wimpy even.

Prod dodge, I will post in the morning.

In post 1586, Detective Pikachu wrote:I think so. Were you in rc's story revisited upick a few years back?

uh I don’t recall

fuck where's my fidget spinner

did I leave it at home again

Rex you also have to explain why your avi is a white square

These things matter