Posted: Tue Feb 11, 2020 9:53 am
Some words from our good old pal and unfortunate Farkstan Nacho would be nice right about now.
because thinking something and knowing it are two different things. i think it's scummy that town doesn't reconsider at all here. i won't know if that's the case unless i prod about it.In post 1570, Psyche wrote:if there's "no way to know" if it's personality then why does it come up in 1559, a post ostensibly about why you think farkran is scummy?In post 1566, Chara wrote:pedit: if Farkran is always like this, it's personality. there's no way to know that without poking at it, which is why i wanted Farkran to reply.
and it's still an issue if he's town.
okay, thanks for the answer.In post 1571, Replica wrote:ie. I'm very confident that alimdia showed a much more investigative and pondering mindset than they have in their scumgames, and am pretty sure the slot is town for it.
I have seen nothing from Bingle that makes me say "Yeah this guy is totally town", and at this point trying to lay out a case for it would be working backwards.
see a lot here about how you're not confident he's scum but nothing that's a rationale for thinking he's scumIn post 1573, Chara wrote:that's what i'm trying to figure out here. it's why i'm not voting to lynch him right now. i'mIn post 1568, Psyche wrote:I suppose my perception is that, despite your protestations, the rationales provided for your farkran scumreads are indistinguishable from criticisms of his play.
The "i haven't seen evidence of Farkran really considering any outside opinions about... basically anything" line is, again, a good example of this. How does that connect to him being scum?
I'd really rather Chara answer over anyone else pushing the wagon.notconfident he's scum.
if it's his personality, he can show me that himself in response. and if itis, maybe that could prompt some sort of rethinking on how he approaches the game. i don't know. mafia's a team game and i don't think soloing it is a good idea in the first place.
and if it's because he's scum, then i think it's a deliberate way to make him difficult to argue with, and possibly an attempt to emulate headstrong town.
again, your reasoning for him being town would be nice.
In post 1187, Replica wrote:I really disagree with Amrun's Alimdia read-they were a townlean for me and going back through the ISO this seems true to me.
Comparing Alimdia's posting here to a recently completed scumgame makes me feel better about the slot, too. There's a lot of throwing out loose speculation and accusations with a lot less emphasis on Alimdia not understanding points or trying to get to the bottom of them.
Posts like Alim's #129, #202, and #211 show a lot more genuine confusion and interest in understanding someone's thinking imo.
I feel a lot better about the slot now. I think Bingle generally isn't framing the argument correctly with the nature of Amrun's read. It might be in reaction to Amrun's #1161 uses hyperbole that can imply it should NEVER be townread, rather than focusing on it not being a great universal tell/it being specific to the player.
I'm solidly off board with either of their approaches.
In post 1319, Replica wrote:Manna has fallen from heaven and the 'Cho has returned. Hype!
I'd really encourage you to look into alimdia meta. Bingle's posting, despite having a really bad understanding of the Amrun argument, hasn't been bad but alimdia's posting is heavily underrated imo and I don't get Psyche's scumread there. This is very likely a townslot imo.
I've got to keep it short tonight, and could probably let the posts stew, but I would say real fast that the "single thing" hangup isn't really applicable to you. I was using the Chemist read as a starting point, and starting somewhere and waiting for more is fine. If anything it applies to Farkran...but I kinda doubt it.
You townread the timing of Farkran's shove on me but the chronology really suggests you shouldn't. #500 followed by #605 represented a change towards me being more skeptical of him. He picked up on this in #616 and asked why he moved from townlean to null but potential scum. I explain that I think he'd be this forceful as mafia and I don't trust tonereading him, instead trusting more his votes and patterns He asks for my perceptions of my own play after I offer them, and 12 hours later comes back with a comprehensive attack based on the gap between my ideals/fears and my actual play. I'll skip how his point changed over time from those personality exploitations to "well spare is bad idk why you go for that over flips" for now since I've been over it enough.
It smacked completely of someone who feared a war coming and decided it would be advantageous to be the one to launch the first volley.
About this towncase of the Bingle slot.In post 1387, Replica wrote:I looked at Guns n Roses alimdia, stronger/more assertive play but I still didn't see the same level of investigation they do in this one. Scum alimdia really likes to unleash the accusations/scumcase all at once rather than laying out a more nuanced process over time. Granted, I only skimmed like half the game and need to double check, but I like the slot and think it's really underrated this game.
NaCl came up with the largest part of his strategy, gambiting about the doctor, etc - i'm not cashing credit where it isn't due, but we have been communicating a lot about that game. I didn't provide any advice as to specifically manipulate you, but i gave him some insight about the meta we shared together (at the time, only the jester game). We tried to push for your lynch because we thought you were easier than, say, Nancy, titus, or Amrun. Turned out you weren't. Adding that to the cult game we recently played together, i think you are a more than respectable player and you deserve to be recognized a large enough scum range over what has been described in Nacho's meta case.In post 1556, Hectic wrote:
it's progression whichcouldbe perceived as scum-indicative, but there's many other scenarios where that progression DOES make sense from a town PoV, if you look at the events surrounding them, which you are failing to consider. Regarding the flaws in your arguments, it was stuff like the list of events in timeline that you presented, and where Chara refuted your points and Amrun thanked for having the patience to, I'm too lazy to go back and find the posts.
Very interesting that you were coaching NaCl into manipulating me. Good job on that, it worked till later on.
i mean it's in the post, you disagreeing with it doesn't make it not exist.In post 1579, Psyche wrote:see a lot here about how you're not confident he's scum but nothing that's a rationale for thinking he's scum
considering the first time i asked about it you gave me "a town role PM doesn't make a man a poet", yes, it is nice to have you restate that that is still your reasoning and that you're sure.In post 1581, Psyche wrote:suppose my rationale for farkran town is still that he seems to be really and sincerely obsessed with gamesolving and pursuing the town wc
do i really need to explain what i see in his posts that leads me to this feeling? is it really not obvious what the broad strokes of a farkran towncase looks like with this thesis? it just seems like a broadly predictable argument
What do i have to respond, with regards to this post? Do you want to know why i am not reconsidering your slot, or Hectic's? I have no reason to, unless i can get another solve that could explain the current gamestate.In post 1559, Chara wrote:because my argument for scum Farkran has never been "well, he's bad."
at this point it's more like i find it hard to believe town Farkran doesn't reconsider when even players townreading him seem to think he's awful, because that's all i keep getting whenever i ask why he's town.
"well, i don't agree, but i like his fervor", or whatever it was you just said.
and i'm not calling him awful. to be clear. the issue here is i haven't seen evidence of Farkran really considering any outside opinions about... basically anything. well not the only issue but an issue.
Farkran: there are other things i'd like you to respond to but this post especially would be nice.
I had not meta'd alimdia Day 1. The "feeling better" comment comes exactly at the time that I first chose to metadive alimdia.In post 1583, Farkran wrote:Most of the case is based on Almidia's meta and posting, which i also townreaded at the time, so i largely agree with that. Bingle is occupying the same slot, but is behaving very differently, and not in a good way. His resistance to engage with the gamestate, and his progression about slots and which strategy to use is not pristine either.I don't see how Replica could be "feeling better" about the slot when he entered d2 sheeping me with a hurt vote on hectic (sheeping Replica's highest scumread, no less),or at least not to the extent Replica is townreading him right now, i.e. describing his lynch as "the brink of disaster". The problem is not the townread itself, it's the level of confidence displayed.
Nope. Read enough Jingle games to know the amount of effort here isn't worthwhile, unlike alimdia/Chemist/Sujimichi who were worth a shot.In post 1583, Farkran wrote:What's individually scummy about the Almidia/Bingle slot is almost entirely Bingle. Replica, have you meta'ed Bingle (or Jingle)?
First, it's not about them being engaged enough, it was that the way they questioned players and sought to investigate their motives is a world removed from their scumgames. Second, Bingle shares the same alignment as alimdia, but that is all. If I don't have an alignment read on one, the other suffices. Third, willingness to reread correlates more with cynicism, experience, and flippant approaches to the game more than it does being scum.In post 1583, Farkran wrote:Why do you find that much unreasonable that scum!Almidia was engaged enough with the game to produce good content, while scum!Bingle doesn't want to?
The fact that I think Bingle town is extremely likely suggests that I would find any team with Bingle very implausible, yes. Me/Amrun fundamentally disagree on Bingle.In post 1583, Farkran wrote:Why is town!Replica so confident in town!Bingle that you can't even imagine a Bingle/Farkran solve, same as Amrun does? Can you explain town!Bingle sheeping scum!Farkran, or even town!Farkran for that matter, just to 180° both his Hectic read and his solve strategy, with Almidia meta alone?
Not even your highest scumread wants to be spared in the first place, to be honest. In order to get spared, i would need a vote from Nacho (might deliver, since i am a tier 2 townread) and one more vote from {Chara, Replica, Hectic, Amrun}. None of them are even remotely close to consider sparing me. If you think i would selfhammer my spare, you are sorely wrong. That would pretty much amount to a scumclaim, after the extent i have been contrasting spares in general.In post 1560, Replica wrote:In 4 spare, sparing a scum instantly tanks our chance of winning below 25%. The strength of the strategy comes from how likely all-town spares are. In 3 spare, sparing a scum means that they won't be forced to remove one. I do not want my strongest scumread spared. I would rather take the spare I'm not sure about but can get a coalition behind than risk a scumread being spared or a bad lynch going through.
Lynching at all removes the possibility of 4 spare. For 3 spare, lynching wrong wastes a mislynch. Lynching my strongest TR means it is both likely to be wrong FMPOV and removes my ideal spare candidate. If a lynch does happen, I want it to be on my top scumread, not on my top townread.
The fact that it does not instantly lose the game does not exclude the day being labeled a disaster. I really don't know how much more obvious I can make this.
can you point whereIn post 1585, Chara wrote:i mean it's in the post, you disagreeing with it doesn't make it not exist.In post 1579, Psyche wrote:see a lot here about how you're not confident he's scum but nothing that's a rationale for thinking he's scum
...where did i say i don't have a large ego? I have a enormous ego. Having a huge ego doesn't mean i am confident in my reads though, just in me being better than everyone else in this game, in this forum, or the universe.In post 1567, Chara wrote:this too. it's what i meant when i wondered why a town Farkran hasn't reconsidered at all. he says he doesn't have a large ego but i feel like receiving townreads for that sort of reason would be really annoying and/or prompt some reconsideration.In post 1564, Replica wrote:Other than one line at Nacho he hasn't blinked at all of the "these reads of Farkran's are batshit crazy he can't be scum" lines. Somehow me saying "Yeah if he's scum he's playing poorly imo" has caused the steam to rise considerably.
Absolutely yes. I don’t think it makes it more or less likely.In post 1497, Hectic wrote:In post 1439, Amrun wrote:In fact my best solve is bingle/farkran but I feel better about bingle dying today, although his recent posting is better but all mechanical so NAI.
If Farkran suddenly becomes viable I’d try there first.
recent push on Bungle?
In post 1501, Chara wrote:Farkran: why can scum never spare vote you? also, who exactly are you townreading now? i am currently rereading your posting and it's probably in there, but if you could restate any townreads that would help me understand your partner solves. do you still think me/Hectic is likely?
Psyche: not comfortable sparing Farkran right now.
Amrun: is Bingle's posting still mostly NAI to you? i've come around to the fact he's at least reading minimally enough to say something.
In post 1504, Chemist1422 wrote:I’d say somewhere around traitor
so basically it’s a scumread but I don’t trust myself to not be confbiasing it, and no one else have real thoughts on it
In post 1505, Hectic wrote:In post 1503, Hectic wrote:Anything changed with regards to your Nacho/Farkran reads since then, Chemist?
He's probably reading too much into the "unvoting heal tag is hard on mobile" thing, but despite ourIn post 1488, Farkran wrote:I did townlean Almidia, but the recent Bingle has made me reconsider that significantly. Bingle's progression that made him go from "i sheep farkran: vote hectic" to "i sheep nacho: heal hectic" to "i am 100% determined i will not lynch today: heal farkran" to "i want to unheal farkran but i'm VLA until the deadline is over and i'm not going to change my vote first"... is bad. Really, really bad. It's like forcing a fake associative on me, because Amrun said he would lynch me if bingle flipped red. Psyche and Replica healing there is also very meh. Especially psyche, who didn't even include Almidia in his fotm sparelist that would lead us to a "so easy victory i don't know how you all can't see it" back in d1. I can buy a Bingle/Psyche team.differences, I do agree with the rest of the sentiment in this post.