Posted: Wed Jun 03, 2020 3:15 am
midway, it would be great if, for once, you included just one reason for one of the things you say. just one. please.
https://forum.mafiascum-staging.net/
@ndmath -- you can answer this?In post 1285, Aloratom wrote:Like to see the answer to this.In post 1257, NorwegianboyEE wrote:And i don’t like your response to that.
WHY did you think Albert was obvtown?
Are you just throwing up every combination you can think of?In post 1573, midwaybear wrote:ok, I'm fine with lynching in {alor, ND, votato}
I don't think ABR is a busser, so that helps Madonna. I'll trust Norwee for now, and I'm decently confident in word being town.
It's pretty clearly a vig. That was me spitballing.In post 1562, Madonna wrote:One of the curious remarks that makes Aloratom feel worse is his [p]1069[/p], that mentions 2 mafia parties, and that pings when also looking at votato, and why I have paired them together. The simpler answer is a vigilante, and I do not see why we would want a more complicated theory based on nothing.
no norweeIn post 1574, votato wrote:why, are you claiming a result on me? people have asked you to claimIn post 1572, midwaybear wrote:Dude what was your night action
so defensive.In post 1577, Aloratom wrote:Are you just throwing up every combination you can think of?In post 1573, midwaybear wrote:ok, I'm fine with lynching in {alor, ND, votato}
I don't think ABR is a busser, so that helps Madonna. I'll trust Norwee for now, and I'm decently confident in word being town.
why does my claim affect your result...In post 1581, NorwegianboyEE wrote:Midway, i'm telling you to claim first.
not attitude. I'll be blunt: did you track me somewhere?In post 1587, NorwegianboyEE wrote:How am i supposed to trust you when i'm faced with that attitude?
No. You did nothing, and that's precisely why i wanted you to claim. Because i wanted to see if you would fake a PR or something. But you didn't.In post 1589, midwaybear wrote:not attitude. I'll be blunt: did you track me somewhere?In post 1587, NorwegianboyEE wrote:How am i supposed to trust you when i'm faced with that attitude?
In post 1583, midwaybear wrote:no, my claim is not beneficial to town IMO
massclaim doesn't help because the two scum are in my poe
pedit: VOTE: Aloratom
he's desperate. Thunderdome?
what?In post 1590, midwaybear wrote:ok, I'm a VT, so...
i did thoughIn post 1591, NorwegianboyEE wrote:The plan was for you to claim VT, i would confirm you didn't do anything. And we'd all be a big happy family. But of course you didn't do that.
no. you arent. you could easily just be a goon or another voyeur who didnt use your voyeur role.In post 1593, midwaybear wrote:i did thoughIn post 1591, NorwegianboyEE wrote:The plan was for you to claim VT, i would confirm you didn't do anything. And we'd all be a big happy family. But of course you didn't do that.
I'm conf town now I believe
You claimed VT after i literally confirmed you were my target. Meaning if you are scum you would know it was safe for you to claim VT.In post 1593, midwaybear wrote:i did thoughIn post 1591, NorwegianboyEE wrote:The plan was for you to claim VT, i would confirm you didn't do anything. And we'd all be a big happy family. But of course you didn't do that.
I'm conf town now I believe
makes no senseIn post 1595, NorwegianboyEE wrote:Meaning if you are scum you would know it was safe for you to claim VT.
i claimed VT BEFORE you outed your plan just after you said you targetted meIn post 1598, NorwegianboyEE wrote:@Midway
I'm still not sure about voting you since Votato and Aloratom are both eager to do so. But it is pretty annoying how you forced me to out my plan when everyone thinks you are a whole lot more scummy than me.