Mafiascum.net

In post 1574, gobbledygook wrote:VOTE: Firebringer

For the same reason I alluded to?

i think fire is town

In post 1576, Bingle wrote:

In post 1574, gobbledygook wrote:VOTE: Firebringer

For the same reason I alluded to?

No, but I’ll read your reasons.

In post 1577, skitter30 wrote:i think fire is town

Why?

I was hoping gobbles scumread me

Why did you vote me?

Lack of anything happening u kind of drifted of from game

In post 1581, Firebringer wrote:u kind of drifted of from game

That is not a statement that is grounded in reality.

Okay turkey

I mean it isn’t lol

My list will be posted later tonight

In post 1584, gobbledygook wrote:I mean it isn’t lol

Pls tell me reality

That will come later tonight

Work + baby duty

In post 1578, gobbledygook wrote:No, but I’ll read your reasons.

He opposed your lynch the first time on the basis of it's speed and the lack of case (along with a presumed townread from the way he was treating you). The only real change is that he feels that you're absent at a point that you were actively defending yourself, he thinks you're a vig, and he still puts you at L-1. I don't see a progression, and he's suddenly fine with the wagon he didn't like a day ago.

Or, more to the point, FB is the intersection of soft defending against the first wagon on you and being on the second wagon on you.

In post 1578, gobbledygook wrote:Why?

~mindmelding~

In post 1589, Bingle wrote:

In post 1578, gobbledygook wrote:No, but I’ll read your reasons.

He opposed your lynch the first time on the basis of it's speed and the lack of case (along with a presumed townread from the way he was treating you). The only real change is that he feels that you're absent at a point that you were actively defending yourself, he thinks you're a vig, and he still puts you at L-1. I don't see a progression, and he's suddenly fine with the wagon he didn't like a day ago.

Or, more to the point, FB is the intersection of soft defending against the first wagon on you and being on the second wagon on you.

Spoiler:

In post 710, Firebringer wrote:

In post 708, Something_Smart wrote:

In post 701, Firebringer wrote:why

Because flash wagons happen a lot and flash defenses do not happen a lot.

but there was literally no case on gobbles scum? the flash wagon didn't have a case attached. It was like everyone just jumped on for 0 reason. Why wouldn't anyone call that out as weird or ask people to explain

In post 713, Firebringer wrote:

In post 711, Bingle wrote:warmpuppy has my posts hidden.

yeah. But i don't see ur case as the reason anyone jumped on. It was pretty random flash wagon. And I don't think ur points against gobbles are good either

lol
I guess our reasons aren’t much different then. I was mainly focused on the fact that Fb is clinging to the narrative of me flying under the radar as the basis for his vote when that was certainly not the case.

Bajingle why you do this to me

In post 1590, skitter30 wrote:

In post 1578, gobbledygook wrote:Why?

~mindmelding~

You mindmeld with fb on me?

Skitter, what're your thoughts about FB softdefending gobbles and then turning around and voting him?

Also, note that he was defending gobbles after

In post 707, Bingle wrote:
Maria's case:

In post 401, MariaR wrote:I want gobble to explain like, anything. His reads feel entirely made up on the spot/meaning to take advantage of the game state. It's a light read that will probably change when he gives me the sit down, but until then I will call him scum. This game had a lot more filler than I was expecting, making it a bit harder to get into it.

i didn't say u were flying under the radar i said u had less presence.

In post 1592, gobbledygook wrote:

In post 1590, skitter30 wrote:

In post 1578, gobbledygook wrote:Why?

~mindmelding~

You mindmeld with fb on me?

on ss

In post 1593, Bingle wrote:Skitter, what're your thoughts about FB softdefending gobbles and then turning around and voting him?

i feel like he didn't know what was going on in the game and when he learned more info he voted

@skitter: How do you feel about this sequence?

In post 1114, Firebringer wrote:VOTE: Gobbles

In post 1119, Firebringer wrote:u feel like u lack presence my bird dude.

In post 1128, Firebringer wrote:i think gobbles is a vig.

oh i thought he voted after he learned gobbles was sk .

yeah that's not great but i'm not sure it's ai for fire tbh

Fair. All of my scum prospects are weak reads though. I'm pretty sure I'm mostly right on townreads, but the people who could be scum are all frustratingly nullish.

Maybe I'm just not going to get a read I'm sure enough about to lynch over gobbles.

I do want to hear from Blake about the state of the game and Chemslot about pretty much anything though.