Mafiascum.net

What is a paper theatre?

I'm about to learn!

Does anyone read Japanese? I'm not sure if I'm supposed to use super glue or that would ruin it :/ cuz like Ivysaur and her spots are right on top of eachother and I don't -think- there is a clasper or connector piece to keep them together but I'm not sure.

That looks badass

Step 2 does have the word “glue” in it 接着剤

Did you know that because you know some Japanese or because you looked it up somehow

that's very helpful i will buy some glue

I know the grammar but I’m illiterate With the characters. I just google translated “glue” and looked for the characters. There are definitely apps that will translate using the camera on your phone

Yeah, they are super useful

In post 1564, Replacement for Sujimichi wrote:Miltank is a budget Snorlax.

The speed tier difference and access to Milk Drink + Heal Bell makes for a more team-oriented play though..
Snorlax is just all about that stall and hitting physical while tanking special..

In post 1570, Not_Mafia wrote:Miltank and Snorlax are completely different, Miltank is support, Snorlax is a tank

Preach.

Oh man, I have one of those too, and I've been putting off that project as well!
Got this book and that paper-theater a few years back when my friend came home from his Korea/Japan trip.

In post 1491, Galron wrote:I don't understand what the case is on Bella I guess. I don't think you're asking me though.

Can you explain what you mean by this?


Ive seen the exact same comment in a prior scum game of mine. In that game my partner said something exactly like your posts. In that game he was commenting on the wagon that had built up on his partner. He didn't directly challenge the push their put instead skirted around the issue.

In post 1479, Galron wrote:Well if this is not_mafia, I'm okay with a policy there or RFS either one. Unless nm is a lylo grandmaster. I disagree with flipping a strong player just to sort another strong player wrt Bella and Isis.

So between isis and bella. What do you think the relationship is.

tvt
tvs
svs


And if you think its tvs, who do you think is scum and why?

In post 1586, bob3141 wrote:

In post 1491, Galron wrote:I don't understand what the case is on Bella I guess. I don't think you're asking me though.

Can you explain what you mean by this?


Ive seen the exact same comment in a prior scum game of mine. In that game my partner said something exactly like your posts. In that game he was commenting on the wagon that had built up on his partner. He didn't directly challenge the push their put instead skirted around the issue.

A lot of people seem to want to lynch bella, and I don't know why if you're asking about the first part. If you're asking about the second part, I thought she was asking Isis, I think, and not me, about it. Or someone. I don't remember who I thought she was asking.

We could wagon Galron tbh

In post 1587, bob3141 wrote:

In post 1479, Galron wrote:Well if this is not_mafia, I'm okay with a policy there or RFS either one. Unless nm is a lylo grandmaster. I disagree with flipping a strong player just to sort another strong player wrt Bella and Isis.

So between isis and bella. What do you think the relationship is.

tvt
tvs
svs


And if you think its tvs, who do you think is scum and why?

I think it's probably town/town. If you ask me if one of them were scum, which would it more likely be, I would say at this time probably Isis, although at the beginning of the game I would have said Bella. Isis has hopped around a bit too much for my liking without explanation, and there have been a couple of other things I haven't liked. But there have been a few things about Bella I haven't liked also, but I'm not sure what those were off the top of my head. Right now I think she is likely town. I think it turned around for me with her when her outlook toward Klick changed. I'm not sure why that affected my read of her but I think it did.

I keep telling myself I need to reread this game, but I am unmotivated to do so.

I really should preview these posts.

In post 1495, UnaBombaH wrote:

In post 1488, Galron wrote:Really, given what everyone has said about nm, I have a null scum read there only bc of flippy flaking. I've only seen him do that as scum. So nm would be policy for me but disagree on >rand.

So you agree with me, and disagree with Isis based on this? Right?

In post 1490, Galron wrote:I didn't preview, but I think I agree with that Isis just wrote.

???

Why aren't these two separate posts? The way you have them it appears you're trying to make a point that there's an inconsistency, but I don't know what that inconsistency would be.

In post 1588, Galron wrote:

In post 1586, bob3141 wrote:

In post 1491, Galron wrote:I don't understand what the case is on Bella I guess. I don't think you're asking me though.

Can you explain what you mean by this?


Ive seen the exact same comment in a prior scum game of mine. In that game my partner said something exactly like your posts. In that game he was commenting on the wagon that had built up on his partner. He didn't directly challenge the push their put instead skirted around the issue.

A lot of people seem to want to lynch bella, and I don't know why if you're asking about the first part. If you're asking about the second part, I thought she was asking Isis, I think, and not me, about it. Or someone. I don't remember who I thought she was asking.

It was una who I thought she was asking.

In post 1589, Isis wrote:We could wagon Galron tbh

Anyway, this would be a mistake. And it wouldn't be a good idea, as Tommy would say.

In post 1586, bob3141 wrote:

In post 1491, Galron wrote:I don't understand what the case is on Bella I guess. I don't think you're asking me though.

Can you explain what you mean by this?


Ive seen the exact same comment in a prior scum game of mine. In that game my partner said something exactly like your posts. In that game he was commenting on the wagon that had built up on his partner. He didn't directly challenge the push their put instead skirted around the issue.

And I can't believe that what I said is that uncommon. Why would you automatically attribute it to a scum motivation? What part of what I said exactly triggered you?

i tell you what.

this not_mafia certainly is a character.

does he usually sustain this for an entire game or are we still in act 1?

In post 1589, Isis wrote:We could wagon Galron tbh

to be fair - and please do excuse ol' hoops chiming in from the background - this slot has been criminally underscrutinised.

Hoops you’ve been lurking in the background whenever you aren’t the main wagon so it’s a touch hypocritical