Mafiascum.net

Still waiting for dunn to claim

VT

In post 1509, Gypyx wrote:

In post 1507, Dunnstral wrote:Did Nep claim anything about their role?

I think i have found a crumb from Nep, so i'd like everyone to claim please, not like we lose anything from not doing so

(i'm VT)

So what was the crumb?

I didn't actually find any crumb, was just trying to maybe make a potential scum PR paranoiad about claming VT

So, do I have to make a big to-do about why Dunnstral is the final scum, or...?

(I will, just not rn. Headache.)

Hmmm, would be appreciated yeah, no need to do it right now, but avoid taking too much time please

In post 597, Not Known 15 wrote:

Vote Count 1.END

bugspray(7) Dunnstral, Truth, Looker, Gypyx,

WaltertheDunce10

, superbowl9, chkflip,

Not Voting(4)

LicketyQuickety

,0verki11,

Psyche,

osuka,

Psyche

(1)redtea,

Truth(1)bugspray,

Gypyx(0)

osuka(0)

WaltertheDunce10

(0)

LicketyQuickety

(0)

superbowl9(0)

Dunnstral(0)

Looker(0)

chkflip

Nash

(0)

redtea(0)

0verki11(0)

No Execute (0)

With 13 alive it is 7 to execute, and 7 to No Execute.

Day 1 ends.

bugspray

has been executed. They were:

Spoiler:

Town Ninja Roleblocker

You are a Town Ninja Roleblocker.

Your actions are not visible to Tracker-like and Watcher-like roles

Each night, you may target a player. Assuming no interference with your action, that player's active abilities will be blocked that night.

You win if all threats to the town are eliminated and at least one town-aligned player is alive.

Confirm by replying to this PM with a summary of your role.

Night 1 begins. Lickety Quickety is being replaced.
Night 1 will end in (expired on 2020-07-30 03:30:00) if a replacement for Lickety Quickety is found within 24 hours.

In post 1074, Not Known 15 wrote:

Vote Count 2.6

Truth(6)

WaltertheDunce10

, Nepenthes,

the worst

, Titus, chkflip, Looker

Looker(3)superbowl9,osuka,Gypyx,

Not Voting(1)Dunnstral,

osuka(1)Truth,

Titus

0verki11

(0)

Dunnstral(0)

chkflip

Nash

(0)

WaltertheDunce10

(0)

Gypyx(0)

the worst

LicketyQuickety

(0)

superbowl9(0)

Nepenthes

redtea

(0)

No Execute (0)

With 11 alive it is 6 to execute, and 6 to No Execute.

Day 2 ends.

Truth

was executed Day 2. They were:

Spoiler:

Mafia Goon

You are a Mafia Goon.

[REDACTED]

Each night, if no other member of your faction is performing this action, you may target a player. Assuming no interference with your action, that player will die.

You win if at least one mafia member is alive and all other players are dead (or if nothing can prevent the same).

Confirm by replying to this PM with a summary of your role.

Night 2 begins and ends in (expired on 2020-08-07 03:34:00)

.

In post 1339, Not Known 15 wrote:

Vote Count 3.4

Looker(5) osuka, superbowl9, Titus,

WaltertheDunce10,

Dunnstral,

osuka(4)Looker,Nepenthes,Gypyx,chkflip,

Not Voting(0)

Gypyx(0)

superbowl9(0)

Titus

0verki11

(0)

Dunnstral(0)

chkflip

Nash

(0)

WaltertheDunce10

(0)

Nepenthes

redtea

(0)

No Execute (0)

With 9 alive it is 5 to execute, and 5 to No Execute.

Day 3 ends.

Looker

was executed Day 3. They were:

Spoiler:

Vanilla Townie

You are a Vanilla Townie.

You have no active abilities.

You win if all threats to the town are eliminated and at least one town-aligned player is alive.

Confirm by replying to this PM with a summary of your role.

Night 3 begins and ends in (expired on 2020-08-15 19:00:00).

In post 1502, Not Known 15 wrote:

Vote Count 4.3

osuka(4) chkflip, Nepenthes, superbowl9,

WaltertheDunce10,

superbowl9(2)Gypyx,osuka,

Not Voting(1)Dunnstral,

Dunnstral(0)

Gypyx(0)

chkflip

Nash

(0)

WaltertheDunce10

(0)

Nepenthes

redtea

(0)

No Execute (0)

With 7 alive it is 4 to execute, and 4 to No Execute.

Day 4 ends .

Osuka

was executed Day 4. They were:

Spoiler:

Vanilla Townie

You are a Vanilla Townie.

You have no active abilities.

You win if all threats to the town are eliminated and at least one town-aligned player is alive.

Confirm by replying to this PM with a summary of your role.

Night 4 begins and ends in (expired on 2020-08-24 18:20:00).

In post 1572, Not Known 15 wrote:

Vote Count 5.1

Not Voting(2)Dunnstral,superbowl9,

superbowl9(3) Gypyx, chkflip,

WaltertheDunce10,

Dunnstral(0)

Gypyx(0)

chkflip

Nash

(0)

WaltertheDunce10

(0)

No Execute (0)

With 5 alive it is 3 to execute, and 3 to No Execute.

Day 5 ends.

Superbowl

has been executed Day 5. They were:

Spoiler:

Mafia Goon

You are a Mafia Goon.

[REDACTED]

Each night, if no other member of your faction is performing this action, you may target a player. Assuming no interference with your action, that player will die.

You win if at least one mafia member is alive and all other players are dead (or if nothing can prevent the same).

Confirm by replying to this PM with a summary of your role.

Night 5 begins and ends in (expired on 2020-08-28 19:33:11).

- Spearheads the bugspray wagon D1
- Isn't voting when either scum are lynched
- lolhammers Looker

Still waiting for this headache to go away, but I'll bring up some posts where he tries to sway away from the Truth wagon and IIRC there is very little in his ISO about superbowl, like, at all. But I'll get on that shortly.

Specifically, if you look at the EoD1 VC, you'll note that Truth followed Dunnstral onto the wagon as well. That's a fairly common newb!scum tell. I'm getting a little busy over here (I've got DM duties for DnD tonight) but I'd like to see what Dunnstral has to say for himself. I'm not expecting much but from the VCs and the overall feel from you, Gypyx, I don't see myself voting any other way. I'd still like to see him at least make an attempt at chiming in though.

I won't bother quoting the Truth stuff, it's pretty cut and dry with Dunnstral just either saying he isn't scum or coming up with other reasons for the "play style" as it were. These are particularly alarming to me, though:

In post 899, Dunnstral wrote:

In post 824, superbowl9 wrote:On dunnstral - I said I would stuff him in town and re-evaluate D2, and he's continued to come off very towny to me since then. I find myself nodding my head at each of his posts (i understand that statement is extemely memeable), as they are accurate, help move the gamestate forwards, and just make sense from a town mindset.

Why post this?

In post 1345, Dunnstral wrote:

In post 1343, WaltertheDunce10 wrote:Why am I alive?

In post 1344, WaltertheDunce10 wrote:Osuka dunn superbowl has a scum among them.

bingo

Then follow up later with this?

I don't get it.

That's all I have time for. I'll be back in about a day or so.

Okay, thanks for the case

Dunn, what about you? Like, just say anything please, really

Well, i'm probably gonna hammer

I mean vote* y'all get then idea

Talk to me before you do that. Where's your head at? What're you thinking?

Well, i've taken a look at every ISO, and i can't really find anything solid pointing towards you being scum, apart from your interaction with bowl / your tone but pretty sure that's just how you play

Meanwhile yeah, you got some good points on dunn, i also have other suspicious stuff, and him being dead silent isn't helping him, so i think he's scum yeah

So, here we go, chk, if you're scum, i am honestly impressed

VOTE: dunnstaal

In post 1583, chkflip wrote:I won't bother quoting the Truth stuff, it's pretty cut and dry with Dunnstral just either saying he isn't scum or coming up with other reasons for the "play style" as it were. These are particularly alarming to me, though:

In post 899, Dunnstral wrote:

In post 824, superbowl9 wrote:On dunnstral - I said I would stuff him in town and re-evaluate D2, and he's continued to come off very towny to me since then. I find myself nodding my head at each of his posts (i understand that statement is extemely memeable), as they are accurate, help move the gamestate forwards, and just make sense from a town mindset.

Why post this?

In post 1345, Dunnstral wrote:

In post 1343, WaltertheDunce10 wrote:Why am I alive?

In post 1344, WaltertheDunce10 wrote:Osuka dunn superbowl has a scum among them.

bingo

Then follow up later with this?

I don't get it.

899 is because the read on me in the above post is pretty bad (since I'm not really doing anything but they're reaching for reasons to townread me) but it being scum-bad wasn't clear

1345 is an unrelated post, I was insinuating Walter was left alive for their reads

In post 1578, Gypyx wrote:I didn't actually find any crumb, was just trying to maybe make a potential scum PR paranoiad about claming VT

So why would I kill nep?

In post 1592, Dunnstral wrote:

In post 1578, Gypyx wrote:I didn't actually find any crumb, was just trying to maybe make a potential scum PR paranoiad about claming VT

So why would I kill nep?

I don't get that question, could you explain

And dunn, i'll wait for you one more day, but like, if you're town, you REALLY need to make an effort there

In post 1590, Gypyx wrote:Well, i've taken a look at every ISO, and i can't really find anything solid pointing towards you being scum, apart from your interaction with bowl / your tone but pretty sure that's just how you play

Which part? Me being condescending/an asshole? Yeah I was like that several times this game (the worst/Nep). Aside from that I'm unsure what you mean here.

In post 1590, Gypyx wrote:Meanwhile yeah, you got some good points on dunn, i also have other suspicious stuff, and him being dead silent isn't helping him, so i think he's scum yeah

The thing the strikes me the weirdest is that Walter was correct about there being a scum in that pile. The interaction I quoted with Dunn and superbowl still sits strangely with me but I his explanation makes sense? Idk.

His complete lack of effort here is mind boggling tbh.

Why kill Nep? I could think of several reasons, the same reasons you'd kill Titus before Walter too. Experience. Actually making an effort to solve. What kind of question is that?

Well, i'll take the silence as a scumclaim, let's end this VOTE: dunnqtall

Oh shit, i destroyed your name