Posted: Tue Oct 13, 2020 12:04 pm
? the vote count is literally at the top of the page.In post 1572, Noraa wrote:I didnt count the votes but last I checked, bingle was the leading wagon
? the vote count is literally at the top of the page.In post 1572, Noraa wrote:I didnt count the votes but last I checked, bingle was the leading wagon
i think there's 5 and bingle probly isn't going to vote for himselfIn post 1575, Noraa wrote:there are four votes on fun and games rn. does that not say anything sir?
cakez isn't trying to wagon us out of the game with a bunch of terrible reasons that make no sense so I'm not paying as much attention to himIn post 1574, Albert B. Rampage wrote:cakez literally said you have 2 votes on you right before. but you don't call cakez out for "facts don't matter to you".In post 1570, Fun and Games wrote:it's literally not the leading wagon but facts don't seem to matter to you
V OTECOUNT 2.041 | ||||||
P LAYER N AME | C URRENT V OTES | S TRENGTH | S PEED | K NOWLEDGE | P LAYER N AME | |
Gamma Emerald | None | EL-7 | 3 | 2 | 4 | Gamma Emerald |
SirCakez | None | EL-7 | 2 | 3 | 3 | SirCakez |
CreativeMod1 | None | EL-7 | 3 | 3 | 3 | CreativeMod1 |
Albert B. Rampage | None | EL-7 | 3 | 3 | 3 | Albert B. Rampage |
Chara | None | EL-7 | 3 | 3 | 4 | Chara |
Bingle | PenguinPower, SirCakez, Fun and Games, Nosferatu, I Keep Siteflaking | EL-2 | 3 | 3 | 3 | Bingle |
Nosferatu | None | EL-7 | 3 | 3 | 4 | Nosferatu |
I Keep Siteflaking | None | EL-7 | 3 | 3 | 3 | I Keep Siteflaking |
PenguinPower | Bingle | EL-6 | 3 | 3 | 3 | PenguinPower |
Fun and Games | Albert B. Rampage, Noraa, CreativeMod1, JohnnyFarrar, Gamma Emerald | EL-2 | 3 | 3 | 3 | Fun and Games |
Noraa | None | EL-7 | 3 | 3 | 3 | Noraa |
JohnnyFarrar | None | EL-7 | 3 | 3 | 3 | JohnnyFarrar |
Not Voting | Chara | |||||
With 12 alive, it takes 7 to eliminate. Deadline: (expired on 2020-10-14 12:10:00) | ||||||
Notes: Currently searching for a replacement for Chara. pagetops: Lilith 28 | penguin 15 | ABR 4 | johnnyf 3 | cm1 2 | gamma 2 | gb 1 | fun & games 2 | nosferatu 2 | bingle 1 | iks 1 | cakez 1 | noraa 1 | ||||||
VOTE: NoraaIn post 1569, Noraa wrote:Not caught up but ur just gonna vote the leading wagon. Nice. Into the SRs u go.In post 1566, I Keep Siteflaking wrote:VOTE: Bingle
Not fully caught up and will not be able to do till Friday.
There was creative, johnny, me, noraa, by the time you said it wasn't viable.In post 1573, SirCakez wrote:who are these "verbal supporters"?In post 1568, Albert B. Rampage wrote:Yes, there was support. People gave verbal consent but didn't vote. Then you said to Noraa "it wasn't viable" and to vote within me charaa and bingle.In post 1567, SirCakez wrote:is there really? they've gotten like two votesIn post 1565, Albert B. Rampage wrote:cakez, why did you say F&G wasn't a viable vote a couple hours ago?
We knew there was support.
why does it actually matter whether it's viable or not? You seem to be more interested in proving that it is viable to wagon me than you are interested in whether I'm guilty.In post 1584, Albert B. Rampage wrote:There was creative, johnny, me, noraa, by the time you said it wasn't viable.
In post 1547, I Keep Siteflaking wrote:Why is it scummy?In post 1530, Noraa wrote:Fun and games starts vanity wagons, sheeps consensus reads even when they are on people that were TRs just a few hours ago
Can you explain your townread then?In post 1586, Albert B. Rampage wrote:I townread Bingle so that's never going to happen.
It matters a lot.In post 1587, Fun and Games wrote:why does it actually matter whether it's viable or not? You seem to be more interested in proving that it is viable to wagon me than you are interested in whether I'm guilty.In post 1584, Albert B. Rampage wrote:There was creative, johnny, me, noraa, by the time you said it wasn't viable.
Do you not understand what's actually important in this game?
why would you make comments on the VC or people voting if you won't even put in the effort to check the VC to make sure your post is accurate?In post 1579, Noraa wrote:u really think I check vcs?
this is stupidIn post 1593, Fun and Games wrote:why would you make comments on the VC or people voting if you won't even put in the effort to check the VC to make sure your post is accurate?In post 1579, Noraa wrote:u really think I check vcs?
You understand people actually spend time on this game right? It's kind of disrespectful of our time if you just randomly spam nonsense.
what does this have to do with my alignment?In post 1592, Albert B. Rampage wrote:It matters a lot.
Cakez borrowed a move from my playbook of trying to present the options for today's lynch. He's more aggressive to defend you than I've seen him play in other games, and his initial reason was "F&G is active so I don't want to lynch him or the game will become stale".
You selectively pointed out nora for not having their facts straight when literally 2 posts above, cakez didn't even realize you had more than 2 votes on you. If you're town, you should be at least a little suspicious of cakez trying to take a bullet for you from out of nowhere.In post 1570, Fun and Games wrote:it's literally not the leading wagon but facts don't seem to matter to you
I'm responding to Noraa because she's trying to get me lynched. When somebody is hard-driving your lynch you usually focus on them and not every person in the thread.In post 1597, Albert B. Rampage wrote:You selectively pointed out nora for not having their facts straight when literally 2 posts above, cakez didn't even realize you had more than 2 votes on you. If you're town, you should be at least a little suspicious of cakez trying to take a bullet for you from out of nowhere.