Mafiascum.net

In post 1569, Nancy Drew 39 wrote:

In post 1562, Battle Mage wrote:I don't think Saudade-scum does all of the following:

1. Makes a point of emphasising how bad the BM-wagon is, going against the vocal consensus.
2. U-turns immediately and agrees we should definitely elim BM today.
3. Actively tries to piss off the townstump for no reason.

Anyone who understands this setup understands that both stumps are informed in both similar and different ways.

yes, but what's your point?

saudade is the lowest of low hanging fruit

confrontational, nearly nonsensical voting

I'm too cynical to not think of it as a strategy

Wat

I've made two votes and both made sense

The path to win this game as scum is to ate nancy into an easy win

One scum ate's , the other posts analytical analysis and the 3rd coasts and afks for the most part of the game

All the while Titus posts bullshit to distract nancy from scumhunting

In post 1573, Sherlock and Watson wrote:

In post 1532, Battle Mage wrote:My vote on you is for your unexplained vote on me...which you still haven't explained? Is this discussion meant to distract me from that?

No, Noraa's early game reads tend to be very solid, she's very obviously town and your response to the push has not been all that good. I also feel like I should UNVOTE: VOTE: Battle Mage because accusing me of distracting you from answering your question when I'm literally discussing my read on you is nagl.

-S

Her vote is based on nothing even remotely credible, as i have explained and others have also commented on. And by her own admission, she has an abysmal record at reading me. The fact she is town is irrelevant and has been obvious since like page 3, and I'm wary of players pointing it out to score cheap points.

If this is the best you've got, I'll stick with my vote on you.

Otherwise, feel free to respond to the above, and talk me through specifically and in detail:

1. What about my response to the push was not good?
2. Why do you think her reasoning is logically sound?
3. Why you would give up your own reads for those of a player who admits they do not have good reads?

In post 1576, War and Peace wrote:saudade is the lowest of low hanging fruit

confrontational, nearly nonsensical voting

I'm too cynical to not think of it as a strategy

Trying to discredit the town stump especially on D1 is nagl. In the last game, Pooky actually had legitimate cause because he was super obvtown and FL kept sr him despite that but Saudade is calling me “average” when I literally keep explaining I know things. Like for example, Fey is never scum here but Mr. “Brilliant” is apparently disputing that despite not a single one of my trs sr her.

yeah i'll roast Sherlock and Watson today - top scumread, followed by Toogeloo and Pyro (yes, I am seeing your lack of read-progression).

In post 1583, Nancy Drew 39 wrote:

In post 1576, War and Peace wrote:saudade is the lowest of low hanging fruit

confrontational, nearly nonsensical voting

I'm too cynical to not think of it as a strategy

Trying to discredit the town stump especially on D1 is nagl. In the last game, Pooky actually had legitimate cause because he was super obvtown and FL kept sr him despite that but Saudade is calling me “average” when I literally keep explaining I know things. Like for example, Fey is never scum here but Mr. “Brilliant” is apparently disputing that despite not a single one of my trs sr her.

i got some scumreads for ya ^

In post 1579, Saudade wrote:The path to win this game as scum is to ate nancy into an easy win

EXACTLY WHAT FUCKING PART Of I KNOW THINGS, ISN’T REGISTERING?

In post 1584, Battle Mage wrote:yeah i'll roast Sherlock and Watson today - top scumread, followed by Toogeloo and Pyro (yes, I am seeing your lack of read-progression).

Why are they scum?

In post 1571, Saudade wrote:I never know who im talking to with this hydra

I think you told Noraa to go to class in a reply to me but incidentally i am disregarding class to do this as well

In any case i never forget to sign my posts so you can take them as a guarantee. Also if a townread is being talked about it's probably me and the other way around for scumreads. not an intentional gimmick but definitely something that will happen

In post 1576, War and Peace wrote:saudade is the lowest of low hanging fruit

confrontational, nearly nonsensical voting

I'm too cynical to not think of it as a strategy

do you have any prior experience with Saudade?

I think gaining Nancy's blessings is at least a ten times better strategy for scum than discrediting Nancy, and i suspect scum knows this too

~Bat

And i know that you know things

Batsunami (Noraa + Morning Tweet)
War and Peace (Ircher + samantha97)
Fey
5uffering Charlie and Snoopy (Marcistar + Shadowslug)
Saudade


ItalianoVD


Starcrossed (Kanna + PookyTheMagicalBear)
Morty and Rick (mastina + Auro)
SaraharaS
Dunnstral
Clidd


Gamma Emerald
Red Eye Knights (Aristophanes + Akarin) Rogue Squadron (Lunar Martian + Akarin) Rogue Squadron (Lunar Martian + Akarin)
Pyro


Toogeloo
Sherlock and Watson (Krazy + PenguinPower)

Move on already, you are impulsive and this hurts our chances of winning

In post 1588, Batsunami wrote:

In post 1571, Saudade wrote:I never know who im talking to with this hydra

I think you told Noraa to go to class in a reply to me but incidentally i am disregarding class to do this as well

In any case i never forget to sign my posts so you can take them as a guarantee. Also if a townread is being talked about it's probably me and the other way around for scumreads. not an intentional gimmick but definitely something that will happen

In post 1576, War and Peace wrote:saudade is the lowest of low hanging fruit

confrontational, nearly nonsensical voting

I'm too cynical to not think of it as a strategy

do you have any prior experience with Saudade?

I think gaining Nancy's blessings is at least a ten times better strategy for scum than discrediting Nancy, and i suspect scum knows this too

~Bat

I’m not saying he’s scum but deliberately ignoring the fact that I’m informed about things he’s not is virulently antitown. I meant what I said, he literally owes his game life to you.

What's the basis of your 5uffering read?

-S

In post 1590, Battle Mage wrote:

Solid Town

Batsunami (Noraa + Morning Tweet)
War and Peace (Ircher + samantha97)
Fey
5uffering Charlie and Snoopy (Marcistar + Shadowslug)
Saudade

Townlean

ItalianoVD

Neutral

Starcrossed (Kanna + PookyTheMagicalBear)
Morty and Rick (mastina + Auro)
SaraharaS
Dunnstral
Clidd

Scumlean

Gamma Emerald
Red Eye Knights (Aristophanes + Akarin) Rogue Squadron (Lunar Martian + Akarin) Rogue Squadron (Lunar Martian + Akarin)
Pyro

Likely Scum

Toogeloo
Sherlock and Watson (Krazy + PenguinPower)

I don’t understand the S & W sr. Can you explain it?

In post 1587, Nancy Drew 39 wrote:

In post 1584, Battle Mage wrote:yeah i'll roast Sherlock and Watson today - top scumread, followed by Toogeloo and Pyro (yes, I am seeing your lack of read-progression).

Why are they scum?

see below. their response to my question about their vote was weak as anything - they didn't defend their reasoning, just tried to double-down in a way that feigns being on the offensive, and all of this after they initially avoided my question (until i forced them to get back on track).

In post 1582, Battle Mage wrote:

In post 1573, Sherlock and Watson wrote:

In post 1532, Battle Mage wrote:My vote on you is for your unexplained vote on me...which you still haven't explained? Is this discussion meant to distract me from that?

No, Noraa's early game reads tend to be very solid, she's very obviously town and your response to the push has not been all that good. I also feel like I should UNVOTE: VOTE: Battle Mage because accusing me of distracting you from answering your question when I'm literally discussing my read on you is nagl.

-S

Her vote is based on nothing even remotely credible, as i have explained and others have also commented on. And by her own admission, she has an abysmal record at reading me. The fact she is town is irrelevant and has been obvious since like page 3, and I'm wary of players pointing it out to score cheap points.

If this is the best you've got, I'll stick with my vote on you.

Otherwise, feel free to respond to the above, and talk me through specifically and in detail:

1. What about my response to the push was not good?
2. Why do you think her reasoning is logically sound?
3. Why you would give up your own reads for those of a player who admits they do not have good reads?

In post 1594, Nancy Drew 39 wrote:

In post 1590, Battle Mage wrote:

Solid Town

Batsunami (Noraa + Morning Tweet)
War and Peace (Ircher + samantha97)
Fey
5uffering Charlie and Snoopy (Marcistar + Shadowslug)
Saudade

Townlean

ItalianoVD

Neutral

Starcrossed (Kanna + PookyTheMagicalBear)
Morty and Rick (mastina + Auro)
SaraharaS
Dunnstral
Clidd

Scumlean

Gamma Emerald
Red Eye Knights (Aristophanes + Akarin) Rogue Squadron (Lunar Martian + Akarin) Rogue Squadron (Lunar Martian + Akarin)
Pyro

Likely Scum

Toogeloo
Sherlock and Watson (Krazy + PenguinPower)

I don’t understand the S & W sr. Can you explain it?

yup 1595

In post 1591, Saudade wrote:Move on already, you are impulsive and this hurts our chances of winning

It takes two to tango. You stop trying to undermine me and we’ll be good.

Jesus Christ

Battle Mage is just Dunn in Titus vs Alisae

why do I have this effect on scum lmao

-S