VOTE: Enchant
yeah I'm kinda in agreement, Enchant hasn't impressed and I want to provide S_S a chance to play because I feel like he can be obv as either alignment
Posted: Sat Aug 14, 2021 9:16 am
by Infinity 324
VOTE: enchant
Posted: Sat Aug 14, 2021 9:22 am
by Something_Smart
In post 1572, rousseau wrote:hi! the rescuers (morning tweet iso) if you'd be so kind
Okay, I read them. Was there any information given about who's controlling them?
Presumably it's not MT, since this wasn't listed as a bastard game.
During day phases at roughly midnight EST time, as well as on day start, up to five NPCs may chip in on the game via radio call.
>>
None of callers are controlled by players in this game.
>>
At least three of the callers wish for the town to win.
>>
One of the callers wishes for the scum to win and is informed of the scums' identities. Scum knows which caller this is.
>>
Both alignments of callers are controlled by non-mafiascum players partaking in their first game of mafia. They are, in essence, newbie stumps.
>>
None of the callers who wish for the town to win know which of the callers share the same wish.
>>
The caller who wishes for the scum to win also wishes to deceive the town-aligned callers into thinking they are a part of them.
>>
Neither alignment of callers know anything about the setup that you do not.
>>
(Shutterbug and Monarch use she/her, Maple and Fleet use he/him, and Locke uses they/them.)
[/area]
Posted: Sat Aug 14, 2021 9:27 am
by Something_Smart
Oh, somehow I missed that when looking through the setup info.
Posted: Sat Aug 14, 2021 9:29 am
by Something_Smart
That seems to leave open the possibility of there being two scum callers. Has it been asked if that's possible?
Posted: Sat Aug 14, 2021 9:31 am
by rousseau
In post 1580, Something_Smart wrote:That seems to leave open the possibility of there being two scum callers. Has it been asked if that's possible?
it has been discussed; the second scum caller would have to be uninformed from the wording
Posted: Sat Aug 14, 2021 9:52 am
by rousseau
In post 1573, Gamma Emerald wrote:we have <72 hours to decide on an elimination, whilst plurality helps I feel like it's not clear who everyone wants out
but also if anyone wants to tell me which way galron's confusing mini-run at pooky leans
i feel like, to borrow something drippinggoofball said earlier via paraphrase, it
has
to be alignment indicative but still i am like,
this kinda disconnect does not feel like town? but i do not think scum!galron is super likely to employ the 'why don't i just do
something
even if it doesn't make any sense' approach?
Posted: Sat Aug 14, 2021 9:53 am
by Galron
It's not that enchant read house's iso it's that he felt the need to announce it.
well 'resistance' is the town of the setup, and while interchangeable i do think 'resistance' would have been the townier answer for you to have given about house's alignment
so i included the gif of rihanna because
it makes it clear that it was a somewhat lighthearted post but still not meaningless
and i quite enjoy rihanna
Posted: Sat Aug 14, 2021 10:19 am
by rousseau
In post 1591, rousseau wrote:it makes it clear that it was a somewhat lighthearted post but still not meaningless
and i quite enjoy rihanna
but see even with this many words i think this is still not really getting across the feeling of the gif, which is why it is better to me
what's your current read on roden (replaced by something smart)?
unless 'frustration felt real' was the extent of it
I think I had him in rvs and.I let it sit there for longer than I usually would bc he felt slight scummy. Then he has the thing about not being able to keep up and that felt real but was nai really. And I don't remember off the top of my head too much of him agree that except I think he was posting more but I wasn't getting anything from him. So I'm null scum I guess on him. S_S will liven the slot up a bit I'm guessing. But Roden left little impression.
In post 1573, Gamma Emerald wrote:we have <72 hours to decide on an elimination, whilst plurality helps I feel like it's not clear who everyone wants out
but also if anyone wants to tell me which way galron's confusing mini-run at pooky leans
i feel like, to borrow something drippinggoofball said earlier via paraphrase, it
has
to be alignment indicative but still i am like,
this kinda disconnect does not feel like town? but i do not think scum!galron is super likely to employ the 'why don't i just do
something
even if it doesn't make any sense' approach?
I missed this post. What was confusing about it?
Posted: Sat Aug 14, 2021 10:38 am
by rousseau
In post 1593, Galron wrote:I think I had him in rvs and.I let it sit there for longer than I usually would bc he felt slight scummy. Then he has the thing about not being able to keep up and that felt real but was nai really. And I don't remember off the top of my head too much of him agree that except I think he was posting more but I wasn't getting anything from him. So I'm null scum I guess on him. S_S will liven the slot up a bit I'm guessing. But Roden left little impression.
hm
i asked because roden wagon felt like the most plausible scum motivation i could think of for you to do this:
In post 1582, rousseau wrote:but i do not think scum!galron is super likely to employ the 'why don't i just do something even if it doesn't make any sense' approach?
Posted: Sat Aug 14, 2021 10:45 am
by rousseau
In post 1594, Galron wrote:I missed this post. What was confusing about it?
it confusing because like
you say it came from scum because scum knows who the scum npc is but you didn't seem to indicate anyway where you thought pooky was like, slipping that they were informed or not actually solving the callers due to already knowing?
and then you asked like, do you want to follow bad advice? when like, has it felt so far like they are really giving us advice to you? or leading us somewhere?
and you kept saying we should listen to shutterbug because pooky was ignoring their content but... what content like pooky said
and you seemed to be missing entire context for pooky doing this in the first place
and then when given context you did not interpret it correctly so it felt like you didn't even check to see if the person you were scumreading was actually telling the truth about why they did the thing you were scumreading them for?
Posted: Sat Aug 14, 2021 10:52 am
by rousseau
In post 1582, rousseau wrote:but i do not think scum!galron is super likely to employ the 'why don't i just do something even if it doesn't make any sense' approach?
but i guess if you still think it made sense as implied by you asking me what was confusing about it then perhaps this does not apply, hm
Posted: Sat Aug 14, 2021 11:14 am
by Ydrasse
i don't feel like posting but also want to post >_>
In post 1572, rousseau wrote:hi! the rescuers (morning tweet iso) if you'd be so kind
Okay, I read them. Was there any information given about who's controlling them?
Presumably it's not MT, since this wasn't listed as a bastard game.
Tetrina told us she was invited to this game by MT and that she plays irl. I believe based on the description of the players that are controlling the callers it is possible that the 5 callers also know MT irl and possibly are from the same player group as Tetrina.
