Mafiascum.net

In post 1574, Gamma Emerald wrote:

In post 1572, Cephrir wrote:

In post 1570, Off The Hook wrote:Shuichi you probably have less exp than Kaito with the person but you should maybe still know what the Kokichi image actually means

-Himiko (GE)

i think i remember where it shows up in the game but any specific connection is lost on me at the moment sorry

not what I mean, there's a reason I name dropped the people I did

-GE

woop
was on the wrong browser after having switched to PC

i can piece that part together but am still not remembering whatever you're referring to

would there really be two ICs in the same setup?

Wheme got his role confused, he was friendly neighbor

-GE

In post 1501, Off The Hook wrote:

In post 1497, GuiltyLion wrote:Gamma, can you sell me on Dunn? Feel free to use the same points you've given to marci in your private chat. "ur tone sux" doesn't do it for me

I haven’t really detailed it much there but I’ll try to spell out some thoughts
[*]General activity level is bad, with exception of one game where he was deliberately playing against meta he tends to be lurkscum, he’s also lurky as PR but vibes differently when he is

I asked for lurkscum Dunn to compare, because in my experience I saw town dunn with 28 posts day 1 in Guardians, and then I saw town dunn with 14 posts in day 1 of Divide and Conquer. And my only scum!dunn game he had like 150 posts day 1 (isekai)

So, I am not sure that I am convinced that him being lurky day 1 is a scum indicator for him

------------------------

[*]I don’t like some of the stances he’s taken or how it’s sounded when he’s taken them (this is why I say his tone sux)

receipts please

-----------------------

[*]The PR during D1 felt inexplicable and like he was deliberately obfuscating his content, he hasn’t made any allusion to why he hasn’t had to write in the way he did D1 in this day phase

I was under the impression from the beginning that he was just messing around with the "PR" day 1

-----------------------

[*]This isn’t really a point against but I feel good about the wagon on him rn

What does this mean?

https://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.php?f=23&t=87781 - Chromatic Ascension, Dunn was Knight Beige
https://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.php?f=83&t=87638 - True Love
https://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.php?f=52&t=83971 - Forest Fire

some (semi-)recent samples of lurkscum Dunn
there could be others from games I didn't keep tabs on but it's hard to verify how his posting rate measures to each game without doing some fancy shit I lack the time for

-GE

I will continue to only complain about Galron being alive until he is limmed. Notty might be a better sport than me but I refuse to consider or engage in anything else until he is gone.

The fact that so many players are jumping through hoops to justify keeping a 95% guilty player alive is embarrassing and reminds me why I don’t play mafia anymore.

~Spiffy

For some reason I thought someone suggested I parity GL and someone. I can't find it now. I was just going along with that. But regardless, you shouldn't listen to me. Do what you want.

In post 1554, Off The Hook wrote:It’s the second line of Galron’s post that reads as problematic.

-GE

Go for it.

In post 1579, Lukewarm wrote:I asked for lurkscum Dunn to compare, because in my experience I saw town dunn with 28 posts day 1 in Guardians, and then I saw town dunn with 14 posts in day 1 of Divide and Conquer. And my only scum!dunn game he had like 150 posts day 1 (isekai)

So, I am not sure that I am convinced that him being lurky day 1 is a scum indicator for him

I'm p sure Dunn was deliberately breaking meta for isekai

-GE

In post 1579, Lukewarm wrote:What does this mean?

mentioned this later on but I feel like the first 4 votes on Dunn were probably all town
obviously that probably doesn't do much for you but as I noted, I wasn't acting like it was anything I intended to use as actual evidence

-GE

In post 1584, Off The Hook wrote:

In post 1579, Lukewarm wrote:I asked for lurkscum Dunn to compare, because in my experience I saw town dunn with 28 posts day 1 in Guardians, and then I saw town dunn with 14 posts in day 1 of Divide and Conquer. And my only scum!dunn game he had like 150 posts day 1 (isekai)

So, I am not sure that I am convinced that him being lurky day 1 is a scum indicator for him

I'm p sure Dunn was deliberately breaking meta for isekai

-GE

also it's not just D1 that dunnstral plays lurky as scum, it's a thing that happens for the whole game, and it's not even rlly tied to post count, because there've been scumgames where he's been caught out for having scummy activity pattern despite being semi-active
And despite dunnstral iirc breaking meta for isekai, when he was guiltied he immediately lapsed into his typical lurkscum meta

-GE

In post 1579, Lukewarm wrote:I was under the impression from the beginning that he was just messing around with the "PR" day 1

it made his posts near-incomprehensible though, which is why I'm lobbing the obfuscation accusation his way

-GE

In post 1580, Off The Hook wrote:https://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.php?f=23&t=87781 - Chromatic Ascension, Dunn was Knight Beige
https://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.php?f=83&t=87638 - True Love
https://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.php?f=52&t=83971 - Forest Fire

some (semi-)recent samples of lurkscum Dunn
there could be others from games I didn't keep tabs on but it's hard to verify how his posting rate measures to each game without doing some fancy shit I lack the time for

-GE

I'm not lurking in the first 2 games, I'm town in the last game.

Whoeve asked, I'm not super scum reading Dunnstral. That's the biggest counter.

Titus, please vote for Galron. If you fail to do so by the end of the Day phase, I will consider it a scum claim.

~Spiffy

In post 1590, Spiffeh wrote:Titus, please vote for Galron. If you fail to do so by the end of the Day phase, I will consider it a scum claim.

~Spiffy

~Spiffy

grr rawr galron roar mafia bad

~Spiffy

In post 1591, Bowser Jr. wrote:

In post 1590, Spiffeh wrote:Titus, please vote for Galron. If you fail to do so by the end of the Day phase, I will consider it a scum claim.

~Spiffy

~Spiffy

This is the most empty threat I've ever seen.

In post 1581, Bowser Jr. wrote:I will continue to only complain about Galron being alive until he is limmed. Notty might be a better sport than me but I refuse to consider or engage in anything else until he is gone.

The fact that so many players are jumping through hoops to justify keeping a 95% guilty player alive is embarrassing and reminds me why I don’t play mafia anymore.

~Spiffy

: - (

im so confused


maybe he is scum, maybe maybe maybe maybe... but what if hes actually town

~M★

I really don't know what to say at this point. But yes I will parity any two players you choose. As I said before, you can figure out the details.

Spiff, get lost. Notsci has seen me when I've been fake guiltied before. I'm just going to keep pounding.

LLD, please vote for Galron. If you fail to do so by the end of the Day phase, I will consider it a scum claim.

PEdit: @marci I am 95% sure Galron is scum based on all of the information provided today. I am not even close to like 50% sure about anyone else. Limming Galron here is a no brainer and the fact that getting votes on him is like pulling teeth is incredibly concerning and frustrating.

~Spiffy

And I'm not saying GL is fake guiltying me, just that I'm accused of killing someone I didn't.

Hey Galron remember that time you were tracked to ta player who was killed and to a player that was stolen from?

~Spiffy

In post 1581, Bowser Jr. wrote:I will continue to only complain about Galron being alive until he is limmed. Notty might be a better sport than me but I refuse to consider or engage in anything else until he is gone.

The fact that so many players are jumping through hoops to justify keeping a 95% guilty player alive is embarrassing and reminds me why I don’t play mafia anymore.

~Spiffy

You know what Spiffeh? I'm tired of being talked down to by people.

I am a better mafia player than you point blank and I am advocating for this half measure plan. Because it's optimally correct and forces scum into the most interesting positions.

Because it forces people to take stances pro/con galron instead of it being a clean sweep

because it means we get to find scum interactions that aren't just hopeless bussing and death, if Galron is scum. And if he's town, we get utility.

There is NO GOOD REASON to be against the play that WISDOM and I BOTH AGREE ON.

That is 2 very good players who rarely agree, agreeing. That should tell you something.

If you're tired of people playing optimally and looking for cool angles, I don't know what to tell you, but don't pretend this is some kind of "people are playing mafia poorly."