Mafiascum.net

If I am scum I literally opened today initiating a 1 on 1 with Koba that would be as simple as me lying about what took place in the hood. BEFORE they claimed anything.

I never claimed a role in the hood, that's a lie. Koba hasn't talked in there in a week, so Koba saying I'm ignoring them is a lie. It's all Koba making shit up and it's pretty obvious from the amount of bluster and BS Koba has been spewing this whole game.

Actually makes sense.

Why you would do that as maf.

im believing the narrative that koba is a traitor trying to push any!Dwlee

more

#releasethethread

human believes Kuba traitor but doesh't vote, tbh.

i also still believe tictac-enchant-dwlee tbh

i can live in both worlds

massclaim is cool actually, we already have the mason, a doc claim, and an investigative claim

In post 1574, Dwlee99 wrote:

In post 1569, tictac wrote:we don't even really know that there is a traitor.
1v1 trade is just bad 4 scum pmuch always and it doesn't make sense to initiate one.
+ i'd think town!dwee would be good w it, yet he doesn't seem to be.

You think I'd be fine dying as a doctor and having y'all enter ELO 4v2??

i mean ur role has no mech effect in this situation, so all the usual vt-stuff applies.

In post 1582, humaneatingmonkey wrote:massclaim is cool actually, we already have the mason, a doc claim, and an investigative claim

UNVOTE:
popcorn from enchant?

Do you want to torture me with boredooooooom.

In post 1577, humaneatingmonkey wrote:im believing the narrative that koba is a traitor trying to push any!Dwlee

Consider the following: No.

NO ONE ELSE NEEDS TO CLAIM

In post 1584, tictac wrote:

In post 1582, humaneatingmonkey wrote:massclaim is cool actually, we already have the mason, a doc claim, and an investigative claim

UNVOTE:
popcorn from enchant?

Sounds good.

we do not need to claim when there is a 50/50.
The people pushing for claims should start if they so want to have claims but no one else

In post 1583, tictac wrote:

In post 1574, Dwlee99 wrote:

In post 1569, tictac wrote:we don't even really know that there is a traitor.
1v1 trade is just bad 4 scum pmuch always and it doesn't make sense to initiate one.
+ i'd think town!dwee would be good w it, yet he doesn't seem to be.

You think I'd be fine dying as a doctor and having y'all enter ELO 4v2??

i mean ur role has no mech effect in this situation, so all the usual vt-stuff applies.

Except N3 scum would have to risk me blocking it or killing me, which is much worse for them than if I got limmed today and now every day after is ELO

In post 1591, Dwlee99 wrote:Except N3 scum would have to risk me blocking it or killing me, which is much worse for them than if I got limmed today and now every day after is ELO

u or one of the claimed neighbors.
the point about ELO just as true 4 a VT!u. are u saying u would consider it a bad trade as a VT?

In post 1590, DkKoba wrote:we do not need to claim when there is a 50/50.
The people pushing for claims should start if they so want to have claims but no one else

the point 4 massclaims is we already paying most of the costs by having outed PRs, so might as well
@roden: ur pow?

What is popcorn

one person claims, and names the next person, then that person claims and names the next one etc.

In post 1592, tictac wrote:

In post 1591, Dwlee99 wrote:Except N3 scum would have to risk me blocking it or killing me, which is much worse for them than if I got limmed today and now every day after is ELO

u or one of the claimed neighbors.
the point about ELO just as true 4 a VT!u. are u saying u would consider it a bad trade as a VT?

Worse than just limming Koba yea duh?

Sorry mod, guess I wasn't clear that I wanted to UNVOTE: in my last post.

Still looking for Chaos to chime in with their thoughts about all of this.

In post 1572, Not Known 15 wrote:One thing just occured to me. Let's actually do the massclaim.

Can you say why you still want a mass claim or no ?

I'm still fine with claiming, I just don't know what the benefit is when we have this 1 vs 1 situation.

In post 1597, ShadowGirl wrote:Sorry mod, guess I wasn't clear that I wanted to UNVOTE: in my last post.

Still looking for Chaos to chime in with their thoughts about all of this.

In post 1572, Not Known 15 wrote:One thing just occured to me. Let's actually do the massclaim.

Can you say why you still want a mass claim or no ?

I'm still fine with claiming, I just don't know what the benefit is when we have this 1 vs 1 situation.

It's not something I want to discuss before the end of the massclaim.

Dwlee and DkKoba, what's your current reads list?