Mafiascum.net

In post 1572, tictac wrote:

In post 1517, Dunnstral wrote:Is this something you ran through a generator and copy pasted? This makes no sense

In post 1506, tictac wrote:current affairs:

set of all possible personage, excluding those not playing this game and also excluding those not using the apallation "fred"

fred

using an encoding of their thought-patters, that is perhaps overtly baroque for the concepts expressed therein,

saying simple things in overly complex way-

yet i get the feeling it's done for jocular aims rather than as camouflage,

i think he does this to be funny rather than to put up a smokescreen

and sure he get's his degrees of proof mixed using a reasonable doubt stardard to counter a preponderance of evidence argument,

uses arguments like "opposite of ur argyment could also be argued", which suggessfully demonstrates that people can have different opinions on what is likely, but actually does nothing to address titus-argument, since the domain of maf-argument isn't usually " what can be proven given evidence" but rather "what is likely given evidence"

but such confusions are not altogether uncommon among mafiasum membership.

while invalid, such reasoning is commonly used on site, so it's not scummy, really.

in short, i don't have a read there, but i do think he is funny.

so i made a homage.

also, marci<fred on grounds of activity, while both are null.

think there's time to check viability here tho
VOTE: meek

In post 1573, Vivax wrote:In my MS games I‘ve always liked Fred and the unorthodox posting, but they seem to draw a lot of hostility for some reason.
Dunn on the other hand has a compelling theory on MMK and is just an insanely detailed player, I can probably just sheep them all game while I‘m more suited for...Trying to have fun. Except when I hammered, I stand by my reasons that causing disappointment made me nuts when I felt like I had no choice to avert it

Also, brain‘s cooking

In post 1582, Legends wrote:

In post 1581, Fredrick A Campbell wrote:Frogsterking, is there anyone other than Vivax you want to execute?

You.

-Frog

In post 1589, MeekMeerkat wrote:I am unphased by being the latest hot counterwagon. Vivax reads like scum posting antispew. Fred reads like a partner looking for a viable counterwagon (what happened to your townread of me, Fred?)

Not sure what the town motivation is for calling out “cheating”, either.

In post 1591, Fredrick A Campbell wrote:Yume - 3rd highest number of posts but barely any posts after the execution of beeboy (a grand total of 6 posts on day 2 compared to 145 on day 1). I now have a scumread on Yume so strong that I want Yume to be executed in this day phase.

VOTE: Yume

Only reasons I'm moving this vote will be because one of the following true:
1. Less than 24 hours are left before the day is over and an execution cannot be reached.
2. I find another player that I scumread to the same extent.

I can't think of any other reason I will move my vote, but I will put it out if I realize there are.