Mafiascum.net

In post 1572, MariaR wrote:Back to the pool for me. Goated lists keep it up
pedit: You both could be a villagers tbh I'm not putting that world out.
Pooky is just a wolf but meh

Wanna do Pooky? I want to see what happens.

Game is pretty stagnant. People yelling too much, not voting enough.

VOTE: Pooky

Say less

In post 1575, Titus wrote:

In post 1572, MariaR wrote:Back to the pool for me. Goated lists keep it up
pedit: You both could be a villagers tbh I'm not putting that world out.
Pooky is just a wolf but meh

Wanna do Pooky? I want to see what happens.

Game is pretty stagnant. People yelling too much, not voting enough.

They aren’t voting yet because it’s only been a short time and I would much rather BGC

In post 1576, MariaR wrote:VOTE: Pooky

Say less

I need to say more to get BGC and their stances.

If Pooky happens and is serious will join.

Like this many wagons to avoid BGC only reinforces BGC scum to me

VOTE: Pooky

And I'd rather get you to stop posting 4-5 times a page so people can coordinate...

Coordinate please...

In post 1580, Titus wrote:VOTE: Pooky

And I'd rather get you to stop posting 4-5 times a page so people can coordinate...

Coordinate please...

Why are you so against me trying to lead coordination?

I literally left for hours and no one post

I then try to lead BGC and you literally accepted the fact you’d have to bus BGC or Frog

Then Maria while well intentioned offers anyone else

Then you take it.

It makes my blood boil because anytime I block or lead a charge you’re inherently against it.

Give me time to lead.

In post 1581, Frogsterking wrote:VOTE: pooky

Oh hell no

I don’t want Pooky anymore

In post 1579, MathBlade wrote:Like this many wagons to avoid BGC only reinforces BGC scum to me

No one wants to work with you Mathblade because you aren't listening. Everything gets filtered through your worldview and repeated over again. You respond to every conversation interrupting people and blocking reactions. I refused to give reads because it would cause you to post more and I feel like they are shit in this environment.

I can't tell BCG from Save from Enchant atm.

In post 1582, MathBlade wrote:Why are you so against me trying to lead coordination?

If you're you have no idea what you're doing right now

In post 1584, Titus wrote:

In post 1579, MathBlade wrote:Like this many wagons to avoid BGC only reinforces BGC scum to me

No one wants to work with you Mathblade because you aren't listening. Everything gets filtered through your worldview and repeated over again. You respond to every conversation interrupting people and blocking reactions. I refused to give reads because it would cause you to post more and I feel like they are shit in this environment.

I can't tell BCG from Save from Enchant atm.

No one wants to work with me because of you and Frog.

I will keep fighting for you three to die.

Because you’re the scum here at least 2/3rds

And Frog outright says I am going to die and if this is my last day I fight

In post 1583, MathBlade wrote:

In post 1581, Frogsterking wrote:VOTE: pooky

Oh hell no

I don’t want Pooky anymore

Case in point.

Your Pooky read is dependent on your Frogsterking read. Data isn't changing and you aren't investigating.

You're fitting actions to your theory, which makes everyone eyeroll.

In post 1585, Frogsterking wrote:

In post 1582, MathBlade wrote:Why are you so against me trying to lead coordination?

If you're you have no idea what you're doing right now

+1 I have like 95% certainty on Frogsterking town.

In post 1587, Titus wrote:

In post 1583, MathBlade wrote:

In post 1581, Frogsterking wrote:VOTE: pooky

Oh hell no

I don’t want Pooky anymore

Case in point.

Your Pooky read is dependent on your Frogsterking read. Data isn't changing and you aren't investigating.

You're fitting actions to your theory, which makes everyone eyeroll.

Your actions fit my theory not the other way around

Like legit 50% of your posts are sharing me versus constructive

You legit ignored my who is your town block post which I have asked many way several times now

You’re not hunting your goal is stopping me

In post 1587, Titus wrote:

In post 1583, MathBlade wrote:

In post 1581, Frogsterking wrote:VOTE: pooky

Oh hell no

I don’t want Pooky anymore

Case in point.

Your Pooky read is dependent on your Frogsterking read. Data isn't changing and you aren't investigating.

You're fitting actions to your theory, which makes everyone eyeroll.

I also legit just said I can’t read Pooky.

I will not join a wagon most of my scumreads are on.

What's the Pooky cased based on? I find Pooky hard to read in general and had them null so far.

In post 1591, MalcolmTucker wrote:What's the Pooky cased based on? I find Pooky hard to read in general and had them null so far.

They're playing to their scum meta and their D1 votes were poor in hindsight

In post 1592, Frogsterking wrote:

In post 1591, MalcolmTucker wrote:What's the Pooky cased based on? I find Pooky hard to read in general and had them null so far.

They're playing to their scum meta and their D1 votes were poor in hindsight

What specifically is Pooky's scum meta? I find them hard to parse in most games but can't recall having actually played with scum Pooky now I think of it.

I'm not inherently against Pooky for what it's worth since I don't TR them or SR them either way, wouldn't have any objections to a wagon to the same degree as I would with STD who I still vocally townread.

Feeling a bit lost on some slots in general at the moment. Maria's voting looks opportunistic at times but I can also read it in the spirit of compromise coming from a slot willing to probe and push things forward. Perhaps I'm too influenced by my D1 read on them.

In post 1593, MalcolmTucker wrote:

In post 1592, Frogsterking wrote:

In post 1591, MalcolmTucker wrote:What's the Pooky cased based on? I find Pooky hard to read in general and had them null so far.

They're playing to their scum meta and their D1 votes were poor in hindsight

What specifically is Pooky's scum meta? I find them hard to parse in most games but can't recall having actually played with scum Pooky now I think of it.

Lurk early game, power through late game

In post 1595, Frogsterking wrote:

In post 1593, MalcolmTucker wrote:

In post 1592, Frogsterking wrote:

In post 1591, MalcolmTucker wrote:What's the Pooky cased based on? I find Pooky hard to read in general and had them null so far.

They're playing to their scum meta and their D1 votes were poor in hindsight

What specifically is Pooky's scum meta? I find them hard to parse in most games but can't recall having actually played with scum Pooky now I think of it.

Lurk early game, power through late game

Hmmm, maybe notable that Pooky's been quieter this turn than they were D1. Been a few slots that could apply to. My view is you and Math has been TvT and therefore it's likely some scum have been lurking in the background to let that play out since it's useful for them.

In post 1596, MalcolmTucker wrote:Been a few slots that could apply to. My view is you and Math has been TvT and therefore it's likely some scum have been lurking in the background to let that play out since it's useful for them.

I have reservations about this because FMPOV Math is hitting all the same beats they did in Lost.

In post 1597, Frogsterking wrote:

In post 1596, MalcolmTucker wrote:Been a few slots that could apply to. My view is you and Math has been TvT and therefore it's likely some scum have been lurking in the background to let that play out since it's useful for them.

I have reservations about this because FMPOV Math is hitting all the same beats they did in Lost.

Lost felt different though because Math was coming into a slot that was already under heavy pressure and they had to work from the beginning to try and get town onto their side. Obviously didn't work out. Not sure Math as scum would have to opt for a similar approach here. Feel like their play so far is closer to how I'm used to them as town, bit more scattergun, ironically not a million miles away from you albeit different styles.

In post 1598, MalcolmTucker wrote:Feel like their play so far is closer to how I'm used to them as town, bit more scattergun, ironically not a million miles away from you albeit different styles.

What do you mean by this?