Mafiascum.net

Well eggman did ask a question about whether there was 3 scum in the game, that question rubbed me the wrong way but assuming there are 3 scum now makes sense.

I do think 2 maf and an SK is most likely though.

9:3:1 looks like a terribly unbalanced setup, too swingy.

In post 1601, Creature wrote:9:3:1 looks like a terribly unbalanced setup, too swingy.

It's pretty common. Depends on roles in play.

Setup speculation loses games for town and wins them for scum.

Just sayin'

Busy on weekends. Will post tomorrow.

In post 1603, DrippingGoofball wrote:Setup speculation loses games for town and wins them for scum.

Just sayin'

Nah, setup speculation means my team wins if I'm given the right information and people don't act stupid usually. Still, we don't have enough to draw conclusions with. Just because it's not a tool you use doesn't mean it's worthless.

In post 408, Eggman wrote:As Creature pointed out, we have a week. Let's not be hasty.
(I like your town game more than your mafioso, Creature.)

After an admittedly quick eggman ISO, I feel good about him being town. Following the VT crumb claim his play improved. Walls like 897 looked like they were from town PoV and his thought processes seem genuine

In post 1606, Dragon of the West wrote:

In post 408, Eggman wrote:As Creature pointed out, we have a week. Let's not be hasty.
(I like your town game more than your mafioso, Creature.)

After an admittedly quick eggman ISO, I feel good about him being town. Following the VT crumb claim his play improved. Walls like 897 looked like they were from town PoV and his thought processes seem genuine

Why the fuck would town be crumbing VT? What about 897 "looked genuine"? Why the fuck would you out a VT crumb that you allegedly saw?

Eggman already outed his VT "crumb", I'm still not really sure why he did that as either alignment.

That reason to townread eggman seems very generic and fabricated though

Just read the game Titus so we don't have to explain everything that's already happened.
I'm not saying his VT crumb was good, I'm saying his play following that point in the game seems improved and more towny. As for 897 and his other wall posts, they seem to come from a natural thought process and seem like legitimate reactions from what's happening in the game. Especially taking into consideration his lack of experience, I don't see scum!eggman creating walls that feel so earnest

In post 1606, Dragon of the West wrote:

In post 408, Eggman wrote:As Creature pointed out, we have a week. Let's not be hasty.
(I like your town game more than your mafioso, Creature.)

After an admittedly quick eggman ISO, I feel good about him being town. Following the VT crumb claim his play improved. Walls like 897 looked like they were from town PoV and his thought processes seem genuine

lol i didn't even realize i quoted this

In post 1609, Dragon of the West wrote:Just read the game Titus so we don't have to explain everything that's already happened.
I'm not saying his VT crumb was good, I'm saying his play following that point in the game seems improved and more towny. As for 897 and his other wall posts, they seem to come from a natural thought process and seem like legitimate reactions from what's happening in the game. Especially taking into consideration his lack of experience, I don't see scum!eggman creating walls that feel so earnest

Explaining what happened gets me much better reads than plowing through oodles of crap. If there's anything in particular you think is important, ok but not right now. Sorry.

Feels good is also frankly a load of shit. Feels good just requires stroking just the right amount of ego.

If there are no gut reads then there is no mafia game

In post 1408, Creature wrote:

petroleumjelly

2 mafia members + 1 serial killer in a 13 player setup looks anti-mafia.

In post 1601, Creature wrote:9:3:1 looks like a terribly unbalanced setup, too swingy.

Which is it

In post 1552, DrippingGoofball wrote:

In post 1549, Eggman wrote:I'm not sure who the third mafioso could be, but I'm pretty sure on {DGB, NJAC}.

Fantastic, help me bus my buddy!

In post 1553, DrippingGoofball wrote:

In post 1546, NJAC wrote:@Egg and @DGB:

Why are you voting me?

Because you're my buddy and I am bus'ing you.

In post 1554, DrippingGoofball wrote:Eggman's reads are a hot mess and he's my other scum buddy.

Da fuq is this

In post 926, Infinity 324 wrote: From scummiest to towniest, it goes something like this:
Derek, Mario, petroleum, dragon, crab, atm, robb, dwlee, eggman, f-oh-ex, smith, creature

Could you make an updated version of this.

dragon, mario, eggman, titus, petroleum (for SK), derek, f-oh-ex, DGB, creature

You moved up because I looked over gunslingers again and I saw you were playing similarly. I would like to see more from you though that's not tunneling on creature.

Well Eggman's who I am suspecting so I don't get why you would think I am tunnelling on Creature. #confused

In post 1587, Titus wrote: The reread does little to answer my question. Like for instance was the townie that died N1 pushing Creature.

Because I didn't understand what your question meant and you didn't clarify after I asked you to.
I do think Dwlee was suspecting Creature before he went to the Crabman wagon, so, yes.

In post 1550, Infinity 324 wrote:Eggman, do you think creature's recent posts have been scummy?

Not really? His wall, to me, just looks like catching up, but with each point in a different post rather than one giant post. I feel like his reads on 64 are fine, as well.

In post 1599, F-oh-ex wrote:A question to the more experienced players from a newb: I know the consensus day 1 was that there are 3 Mafia but since it's apparently a multiball or SK exists, can we be still sure of this? I don't think it's a scumslip per se but this post rubs me wrong.

I will repeat, I bet my scumread it's a Vig.

In post 1614, Dragon of the West wrote:

In post 1552, DrippingGoofball wrote:

In post 1549, Eggman wrote:I'm not sure who the third mafioso could be, but I'm pretty sure on {DGB, NJAC}.

Fantastic, help me bus my buddy!

In post 1553, DrippingGoofball wrote:

In post 1546, NJAC wrote:@Egg and @DGB:

Why are you voting me?

Because you're my buddy and I am bus'ing you.

In post 1554, DrippingGoofball wrote:Eggman's reads are a hot mess and he's my other scum buddy.

Da fuq is this

Sarcasm. I hope.
Derek, why the blank vote on Creature?

@Eggman,

Pick one. No reasons.

Are you overconfident or not subtle?

Overconfident.

In post 1618, Titus wrote:Well Eggman's who I am suspecting so I don't get why you would think I am tunnelling on Creature. #confused

That was to Derek, silly

In post 1620, Titus wrote:@Eggman,

Pick one. No reasons.

Are you overconfident or not subtle?

What's the point of this question?

UNVOTE: Eggman

Be more careful next time Egg.

@Infinity, I like going to the moon.

I think this is town Titus, not sure yet