Mafiascum.net

Posted: **Thu Nov 14, 2019 11:02 pm**

In post 1596, Datisi wrote:Lmaoooo I'm sorry I had to

Mena flips town stop this

ARE YOU BLIND

Posted: **Thu Nov 14, 2019 11:03 pm**

In post 1589, Iconeum wrote:
In post 1587, Menalque wrote:
In post 1582, Iconeum wrote:i don't think ur scum for not hammering
The greater part of your argument recently has been all about my not hammering implying scum!me not wanting to be on the wrong side of a town flip
please don't cherry pick

So those are all of your posts arguing that the hammer situation is scummy/pushing me for that vs what I think are about two posts including the other points you made on this page

Go ahead and explain how that’s cherrypicking

Posted: **Thu Nov 14, 2019 11:03 pm**

good job you managed to quote my ISO

Posted: **Thu Nov 14, 2019 11:04 pm**

In post 1600, Datisi wrote:
In post 1596, Datisi wrote:Lmaoooo I'm sorry I had to

Mena flips town stop this
ARE YOU BLIND

No, but mildly irritated that I’ve woken up to an L-1 wagon that is 100% scum motivated

So if it was a joke then, yes, I missed it

Posted: **Thu Nov 14, 2019 11:05 pm**

39 40 initial callout
43 the vote

45 simple defence from Wimpy

49 is where you ask how serious the vote is

53 and 55 are explanations both serious and RVS'y from Wimpy

You decide that Wimpy calling something violating site rules comes from scum and even call Wimpy mislynch bait because you know this in 58

68 you actually are questioning Wimpy

Over the course of several posts, there's a 1v1 between Wimpy and Datisi, where Menal keeps doubting Datisi but ends up thinking WImpy is the scum here? Doesn't make sense.

90 is still Wimpy being towny trying to be helpfull

But 91 is where the bad part starts.
95 on out you have clearly already made up your mind about nothing at all.

Wimpy even calls you out on this in 99 and begins full OMGUS mode in 101

Even in 108 you repeat that the foundation of your scumread there is basicly RVS entry into the game.

-----

Everything, pages upon pages upon pages of crap you spit out against Wimpy was not you sorting. It was a crappy push, leaving absolutely no room or opportunity for Wimpy to engage with you and make you reconsider. Yeah it was a push in bad faith.

Posted: **Thu Nov 14, 2019 11:06 pm**

If you honestly thought I'd give legit intent after being the only one defending you there then

Tho it was prob a v bad thing to post I'm sorry

Posted: **Thu Nov 14, 2019 11:06 pm**

In post 1602, Iconeum wrote:good job you managed to quote my ISO

You mean the significant section of your ISO that demonstrates exactly how much of your push on me has been about my intent and then my not hammering when you’re claiming that saying that was the greater part of your push on me was me cherrypicking?

Posted: **Thu Nov 14, 2019 11:08 pm**

In post 1603, Menalque wrote:No, but mildly irritated that I’ve woken up to an L-1 wagon that is 100% scum motivated

4 players on your wagon in a 9 player game calling you scum

how is that 100% scum motivated

Also, if I'm the 4th vote on the wagon, and you think I'm scum, who am I scum with? Because it has to be in the first 3 votes if you want it to be scum motivated.

Posted: **Thu Nov 14, 2019 11:10 pm**

Icon didn't you say in 695 that you can see why Mena was SRing Wimpy? And it wasn't just about the entrance?

Posted: **Thu Nov 14, 2019 11:11 pm**

So your scumteam is now in

(Wicked/Ali/Luca/Ico)

You call the 4 votes on you 100% scum motivated

I'm scum according to you

So with Wicked(???), Ali or Luca?

Posted: **Thu Nov 14, 2019 11:12 pm**

In post 1607, Iconeum wrote:
In post 1603, Menalque wrote:No, but mildly irritated that I’ve woken up to an L-1 wagon that is 100% scum motivated
4 players on your wagon in a 9 player game calling you scum

how is that 100% scum motivated

Also, if I'm the 4th vote on the wagon, and you think I'm scum, who am I scum with? Because it has to be in the first 3 votes if you want it to be scum motivated.

Scum motivated isn’t necessarily who first voted it’s about how much scum is on it + who’s pushed it

And for what reasons they’ve pushed it

Posted: **Thu Nov 14, 2019 11:12 pm**

In post 1608, Datisi wrote:Icon didn't you say in 695 that you can see why Mena was SRing Wimpy? And it wasn't just about the entrance?

And I didn't scumread Menal at that time.

Also, I could see the case yes. But that case was made AFTER he already made up his mind as demonstrated in my case here.

Posted: **Thu Nov 14, 2019 11:12 pm**

In post 1610, Menalque wrote:
In post 1607, Iconeum wrote:
In post 1603, Menalque wrote:No, but mildly irritated that I’ve woken up to an L-1 wagon that is 100% scum motivated
4 players on your wagon in a 9 player game calling you scum

how is that 100% scum motivated

Also, if I'm the 4th vote on the wagon, and you think I'm scum, who am I scum with? Because it has to be in the first 3 votes if you want it to be scum motivated.
Scum motivated isn’t necessarily who first voted it’s about how much scum is on it + who’s pushed it

And for what reasons they’ve pushed it

I jumped on, I didn't push it to L-2 before voting

Posted: **Thu Nov 14, 2019 11:13 pm**

I even expressed my concern about wicked being on it

Posted: **Thu Nov 14, 2019 11:13 pm**

So who pushed your wagon?

Posted: **Thu Nov 14, 2019 11:16 pm**

So what happened with there being LOADS of AI things in Mena's iso? If you thought he was town despite all that before then this change seems weird

Posted: **Thu Nov 14, 2019 11:16 pm**

In post 1600, Datisi wrote:
In post 1596, Datisi wrote:Lmaoooo I'm sorry I had to

Mena flips town stop this
ARE YOU BLIND

why are you townreading menal exactly?

Posted: **Thu Nov 14, 2019 11:18 pm**

In post 1615, Datisi wrote:So what happened with there being LOADS of AI things in Mena's iso? If you thought he was town despite all that before then this change seems weird

No, you know what's weird? Menal's entire ISO.

His push on Wimpy. His refusal to discuss any other slot other then you. His attempted and continuous pocketing towards you.
His entire play wrt the intent.

How do you townread

any

of that ?

Posted: **Thu Nov 14, 2019 11:20 pm**

@Datisi who's the scumteam according to you rn?

Posted: **Thu Nov 14, 2019 11:22 pm**

While not as much, he's discussed other slots. He's presented a PoE. Wimpy had legit scummy moments. The play around the hammer was weird but I don't think it's scummy.

Pedit: oh joy yeah ask me that.
I don't fucking know. I don't think scum is in Datisi/Luca/Mena/Icon/emps atm. This is the best I can give you.

Posted: **Thu Nov 14, 2019 11:25 pm**

In post 716, Iconeum wrote:I literally think Town!Wimpy has been forced into a corner by Menal, who used a semi-good early case but then just dicked Wimpy into this.

You can just reread Menal and see for yourself just how much of a [REDACTED BY ICONEUM] he's been and how he handled his scumread.

Posted: **Thu Nov 14, 2019 11:26 pm**

In post 1619, Datisi wrote:Pedit: oh joy yeah ask me that.

well yeah

town clearly isn't alligned here

and there's a big problem this game wrt wagons

wicked was widely scumread but we couldn't even manage an L-1
Aldus got to L-1 but refused to claim and is now town because of that?

Menal at L-1 but you clearly disagree with that

One of us is wrong here

Posted: **Thu Nov 14, 2019 11:27 pm**

I don’t think your progression makes sense icon

I think you’re forced to walk back your early on analysis of my case on wimpy in order to justify your arguments here

Posted: **Thu Nov 14, 2019 11:27 pm**

In post 1050, Menalque wrote:Especially given the lack of daytalk which I keep forgetting is a thing

Posted: **Thu Nov 14, 2019 11:27 pm**

Do you still wanna go wicked?

Mafiascum.net

Micro 900: Autumnal Mafia (Game Complete)