Nope - that's not how this works.In post 1558, Battle Mage wrote:and I should get to decide tomorrow's lynch.
actually, that is exactly how that works. this statement is bafflingIn post 1561, Battle Mage wrote:you can't just change your mind in light of new evidence?
the difference between me and you is that iIn post 1561, Battle Mage wrote:with me, it's a pretty quick process - I don't feel the need to progress gradually to avoid making any wrong moves, if you catch my drift.
notscience and I have not only talked multiple times but notscience has discussed his views on me (and how they waffle) multiple timesIn post 1577, Battle Mage wrote:Please, notscience, do try and justify your scumhunting strategy, and tell me why somebody like Hiraki shouldn't even get a mention from ya?
i would ask why you're trying to agitate him but you've done this to me in other games so there's no point here. it's still annoying and childishIn post 1595, Battle Mage wrote:I don't think domes are obtuse - wanna re-think your angle here?In post 1594, notscience wrote:I’m cursing at my autocorrect not you. Why are you being so obtuse?
Though jokes aside, I don't buy at all the 'claim' that you're corresponding with your auto-correct in this thread.
I'm naive - where was this said?In post 1596, PranaDevil wrote:You announced, loudly in thread, that Agar was protected. That meant the entire role of mine was suddenly WIFOM that night.
This isIn post 1596, PranaDevil wrote:I check Agar, and he doesn't die = "Of course you shouldn't have checked Agar scum would avoid him because I said he would be killed"
First, if you believed that there would be a protective role on Agar, then you would effectively know who that person is and would be able to manipulate the game so that person could stay hidden and hopefully protect YOU next or even better start a
Second, I don't see the problem in "wasting" a shot by going on what seems like the most common choice. Gambits are...gambits by nature.
I really really really don't see how you think the first one leads to a wagon right now.In post 1596, PranaDevil wrote:I don't check Agar, and he dies = "Of course he would die, you should have checked him".
You covered yourself for both bases.
No - this is based off of what you think. I don't know if it's town thinking but it's dead thinking anyway.In post 1596, PranaDevil wrote:You should not be announcing, in fucking thread, what the PR should be doing, because it turns the whole thing into WIFOM. I took a gamble that scum would take out the one person who was confirmed town.
I don't buy this at all.In post 1596, PranaDevil wrote:That gave them three people. Me, Agar and Una. I had two choices, and yet a 33% chance to hit scum. It was worse than a coin flip.