Mafiascum.net

In post 1263, skitter30 wrote:Also if ss were scum i'd expect multiple scum to be on the original gobble wagon

Could you explain this?

I think I get where you're coming from, I just want to be sure.

if he's scum and knows that gobble is not it's weird to comment on the people *protesting* the wagon and not the wagon speed itself (which is where i'd expect people to first comment on) - it feels like something scum would say to 'balance' what their partners are doing so to speak.

like they see their partners are doing x, so they throw shade on the people not doing x to validate what their partners are doing, if that makes sense

so like if ss is scum that feels like a natural reaction to seeing multiple partners on a wagon, but a strange reaction otherwise

(i know that people think i'm harping on that post and blowing it out of proportion but it did not, and does not, feel like something town would say there)

i agree with skitter. Except for when she said i didn't look good. I always look good.

In post 1599, Bingle wrote:Fair. All of my scum prospects are weak reads though. I'm pretty sure I'm mostly right on townreads, but the people who could be scum are all frustratingly nullish.

Maybe I'm just not going to get a read I'm sure enough about to lynch over gobbles.

I do want to hear from Blake about the state of the game and Chemslot about pretty much anything though.

Hello.

It's really interesting how people are starting to claim that their reads are solidifying, yet the votes are still this spread out.

Gobbledygook looks like a copout lynch that scum are abusing. Who has been advocating for him to be the day one lynch?

In post 1605, Blake Belladonna wrote:Gobbledygook looks like a copout lynch that scum are abusing. Who has been advocating for him to be the day one lynch?

Well 8/12 people who are not me have voted for me so... everyone.

In post 1605, Blake Belladonna wrote:It's really interesting how people are starting to claim that their reads are solidifying, yet the votes are still this spread out.

Gobbledygook looks like a copout lynch that scum are abusing. Who has been advocating for him to be the day one lynch?

Quite a few people. Even I was on the wagon at one time.

hey that's what i said !

datisi, jingle, and mena a bit come to mind

oh mariar too

i'm primarily voting gobbles cuz he wont' agree to be leashed, if he were i'd be down to let him have a night and try to find other scum today instead

Voting for Gobbledygook does not equate to advocating for it.

i mean he is gonna shoot in his scumreads or we lynch him. As long as he doesn't go and shoot consensus town i don't see why we bother this day with lynching him. That is my hot take.

Still not ready to post my list
But, I just want to say that even though I’m SK most people pretty much stopped scumhunting today. This is evidenced by the fact that Since yesterday this game has been very stagnant. Scum are very content to let my lynch go through.

In post 1611, Blake Belladonna wrote:Voting for Gobbledygook does not equate to advocating for it.

the names i gave above are the ones advocating for it

gobble would you make a lolkill tonight?

In post 1608, skitter30 wrote:hey that's what i said !

datisi, jingle, and mena a bit come to mind

In post 1609, skitter30 wrote:oh mariar too

Interesting.

Scum are most likely to be in the rest of the votes, especially ones that suddenly appeared after the SK reveal. Bonus points if they have a very low content to noise ratio.

In post 1601, skitter30 wrote:like they see their partners are doing x, so they throw shade on the people not doing x to validate what their partners are doing, if that makes sense

Yeah, that's kinda what I thought you were getting at.

Softdefending gobbles and simultaneously casting shade at the other people soft defending gobbles to hedge his bets against the wagon shifting to a scumbuddy. I think the inverse conclusion (SS is not scum with Skitter/FB/I think there was one more person doing that) is more reliable, though.

In post 1615, skitter30 wrote:gobble would you make a lolkill tonight?

How do you define a lolkill?

In post 1616, Blake Belladonna wrote:Scum are most likely to be in the rest of the votes, especially ones that suddenly appeared after the SK reveal.

Gobbles was L-1 before the SK reveal.

There were unvotes after, but I don't think anyone jumped on.

I'd have to double check to determine who is in the gobbles must die vs gobbles must vig camps.

In post 1616, Blake Belladonna wrote:

In post 1608, skitter30 wrote:hey that's what i said !

datisi, jingle, and mena a bit come to mind

In post 1609, skitter30 wrote:oh mariar too

Interesting.

Scum are most likely to be in the rest of the votes, especially ones that suddenly appeared after the SK reveal. Bonus points if they have a very low content to noise ratio.

there isn't really anybody who fits taht description i think? nobody joined the wagon except for fire and he didn't know gobble claimed sk
i think taht there's at least one scum in that least of names

In post 1618, gobbledygook wrote:

In post 1615, skitter30 wrote:gobble would you make a lolkill tonight?

How do you define a lolkill?

Killing Bingle.

In post 1618, gobbledygook wrote:

In post 1615, skitter30 wrote:gobble would you make a lolkill tonight?

How do you define a lolkill?

someone who is consensus townread or has the potential to be in the next day or so

In post 1621, Bingle wrote:

In post 1618, gobbledygook wrote:

In post 1615, skitter30 wrote:gobble would you make a lolkill tonight?

How do you define a lolkill?

Killing Bingle.

Killing Skitter.

In post 1619, Bingle wrote:

In post 1616, Blake Belladonna wrote:Scum are most likely to be in the rest of the votes, especially ones that suddenly appeared after the SK reveal.

Gobbles was L-1 before the SK reveal.

There were unvotes after, but I don't think anyone jumped on.

I'd have to double check to determine who is in the gobbles must die vs gobbles must vig camps.

In post 1620, skitter30 wrote:

In post 1616, Blake Belladonna wrote:

In post 1608, skitter30 wrote:hey that's what i said !

datisi, jingle, and mena a bit come to mind

In post 1609, skitter30 wrote:oh mariar too

Interesting.

Scum are most likely to be in the rest of the votes, especially ones that suddenly appeared after the SK reveal. Bonus points if they have a very low content to noise ratio.

there isn't really anybody who fits taht description i think? nobody joined the wagon except for fire and he didn't know gobble claimed sk
i think taht there's at least one scum in that least of names

That's where I would look first.

Who in general has a very low content to noise ratio? Scum drowning out the game in nonsense would help explain why people are seemingly coming to conclusions regarding their reads, yet there is low cohesion.