Mafiascum.net

In post 1592, Gypyx wrote:Here's the read list, a bit rushed but i hope it'll help you seeing where i'm thinking rn

Gypyx :

Gypix
Bottom text

here be the townguys :

Fidget - I could locktown that guy honestly, this slot didn't take much place in my thoughts but while re-reading i like him a lot

Tayl0r Swift - good effort and good posting, i don't think anyone thinks the contrary?

Ehhhh, probably town :

Glitch - I was kinda null on Eddie, but as I said i like how Glitch has been playing the game so far, a strong candidate to become more than just leantown

DrippingGoofball - i wasn't feeling great about that slot early day 1, but it's slowly changing

Marashu - i'm just not seeing scumminess from this slot, and i think peoples are exagerrating the lurk

No fucking clue

Titus - i just can't really get a read on titus, i had that problem in a previous game with her

Noraa - on the one hand, i REALLY liked the previous players of noraa's slot, on the other hand, Noraa herself do be acting scummy

Pickaxe - played okayyyy-ish so far, but he also defended nosferatu in a pretty bad way imo "yeah he didn't bring content but because that's all i'm seeing i'm not voting there"

Received a red PM

Vecna
Nosferatu

I already explained those two, but i think they have a pretty good partner equity

And also, quick note but i'm basing a lot my reads off of gut this game, mostly because i have a small lack of time to play, and pretty sure that my gut is better than my logic

You can do better, Gypyx. These reads have no substance at all.

Fidget: "I like him a lot"
Taylor: "Everyone agrees she's a good poster"
Glitch: "has been playing the game"
DGB: "slowly changing"
Marashu: "not seeing scumminess" - people exaggerating the lurk is substance at least
titus: "can't read her"
Noraa: "acting scummy"
Pete: "defended nos in a bad way" - substance but bad read, no one was making a case for scum!nos and how was my saying no one was making a case for scum!nos worse than any one else saying it; the "in a bad way" is hyperbole, looks like filler or agenda driven
Vecna & Nos: "already explained"

At least point to where you've explained Vecna and Nos.

@Pickaxe Pete, Why are you applying this pressure to Gypx and not Mara who did the same thing?

I'd have to go back and look and marshu, but what caught my eye with gypyx was the horrendously bad take on me.

It's his last post.

In post 1514, Pickaxe Pete wrote:Look content!

Meanwhile Marashu's not posted for 50 hours. Maybe a flake there. Maybe Titus is onto something I guess.

In post 1602, Pickaxe Pete wrote:I'd have to go back and look and marshu, but what caught my eye with gypyx was the horrendously bad take on me.

Why weren't you actually watching his posts?

Hmm? He posted that after I knocked off yesterday and today I saw the wagon on me and picked everything up from there. I"m not sure what your question is.

In post 1605, Pickaxe Pete wrote:Hmm? He posted that after I knocked off yesterday and today I saw the wagon on me and picked everything up from there. I"m not sure what your question is.

Posted that silly reads list that is.

I was going to say that I'm willing to vote marashu but I'm not going to vanity wagon it, but since we need just a plurality I think I will. If Marashu is part of your solve, Titus, you should join me. DGB and Taylor too -- the reasons for voting me are pretty lame.

VOTE: Marashu

you dont have anything to say about the case on you other than you think its lame?

In post 1607, Pickaxe Pete wrote:I was going to say that I'm willing to vote marashu but I'm not going to vanity wagon it, but since we need just a plurality I think I will. If Marashu is part of your solve, Titus, you should join me. DGB and Taylor too -- the reasons for voting me are pretty lame.

VOTE: Marashu

If Mara is part of my solve?

The only person likely to go to Mara is me. Now I have a wagon on someone actually in my scum pool.

Now, you're willing to vote Mara after I highlight your disparate treatment of Mara and Gypyx and with this little time to deadline.

I REALLY want Mara but I don't think it's got legs and this is an attempt to peel votes away from you.

In post 1583, Titus wrote:

In post 1581, Noraa wrote:how do u see im on?

I can see your name come up as the last poster on various threads.

Why do you not like this wagon? Because Pickaxe is a lurker?

ooop. I have a lot of threads and I tend to check the ones im more interested(no offense but no im not that interested in this game specifically)
axe hasn't been in my SRs even once. ofc I haven't really tried to solve this slot but either way he's not pinged my scum radar ... yet

In post 1586, DrippingGoofball wrote:

In post 1582, Noraa wrote:I don't really like this flash wagon so I have not joined in

How come you're eager to sheep Tayl0r on everything, but you balk at Pickaxe Pete?

We have only 3 days left to eliminate. We're cooperating to consolidate our reads.

I dont sheep Taylor on everything.

He just fluffs a lot is what I can tell :/

@Noraa, why don't you try and solve the Pickaxe Pete slot? He was a major wagon d1, so I can't fathom how you just haven't got around to it.

His slot just scream MEH at me. I dont see anything fishy but I dont see anything towny so he is null.

In post 1613, Noraa wrote:His slot just scream MEH at me. I dont see anything fishy but I dont see anything towny so he is null.

Why don't you take a fresh look at his ISO given he's the lead wagon?

In post 1614, Titus wrote:

In post 1613, Noraa wrote:His slot just scream MEH at me. I dont see anything fishy but I dont see anything towny so he is null.

Why don't you take a fresh look at his ISO given he's the lead wagon?

will do.

I dislike a lot of things in his ISO I must say but considering that no one else's ISO really looks better anyways, im not really convinced.

In post 1616, Noraa wrote:I dislike a lot of things in his ISO I must say but considering that no one else's ISO really looks better anyways, im not really convinced.

WTF is this?

What do you not like in his ISO?

How does no one else look better than a slot you're actively disliking?

In post 1617, Titus wrote:

In post 1616, Noraa wrote:I dislike a lot of things in his ISO I must say but considering that no one else's ISO really looks better anyways, im not really convinced.

WTF is this?

What do you not like in his ISO?

How does no one else look better than a slot you're actively disliking?

uh I dont exactly like anyone else's iso either

In post 1618, Noraa wrote:

In post 1617, Titus wrote:

In post 1616, Noraa wrote:I dislike a lot of things in his ISO I must say but considering that no one else's ISO really looks better anyways, im not really convinced.

WTF is this?

What do you not like in his ISO?

How does no one else look better than a slot you're actively disliking?

uh I dont exactly like anyone else's iso either

What do you not like in Pete's ISO?

So you don't like Taylor's ISO?

Why is it so difficult to get you to sort the leading wagon?

In post 1592, Gypyx wrote:I already explained those two, but i think they have a pretty good partner equity

hmm very interesting tell me more

every scum read this dude has is predicated on me having a red pm when i just dont

if ur town i pray for u

Yeah so Noraa's posts read as complete insanity half the time, but I wouldn't hold my breath on her having extra odds of being scum.

In post 1600, Pickaxe Pete wrote:You can do better, Gypyx. These reads have no substance at all.

They aren't elaborated much on, but I don't really mind I guess. I tend to agree with DGB/Gypyx/Tayl0r being town. Don't really see what he sees about Vecna!scum.

It's probably telling that this Pickaxe wagon is finally one that is gaining steam. But if that turns out to be so, I'm sure Titus will find the bad guys with her VCA.

In post 1612, Titus wrote:@Noraa, why don't you try and solve the Pickaxe Pete slot? He was a major wagon d1, so I can't fathom how you just haven't got around to it.

Because Noraa is scum