Mafiascum.net

In post 1581, Lukewarm wrote:https://wiki.mafiascum.net/index.php?ti ... ts_as_Town

Fun read about fake guilties

I read this and… it’s basically accurate. And it’s been around for 7 years.

In post 1596, ssbm_Kyouko wrote:

In post 1591, Noraa wrote:and who are you? FMFT?

Yeah, free tea phonetically is similar to three tea as in T3 I think.

ah

In post 1597, ssbm_Kyouko wrote:

In post 1595, Andresvmb wrote:

In post 1582, ssbm_Kyouko wrote:I was pretty sure I was correct when I claimed it.

And yet somehow you were wrong

You could read the thread next time you're town before you lolhammer

Lolhammering is infinitely better than the shit you pulled. Try again.

Like trying to justify faking a guilty means you’re not thinking clearly. It had disastrous consequences here. And yet, you think it was appropriate because you were “so sure” I was Scum. It’s absurd, and it deserves ridicule. It doesn’t matter how poorly I’ve played up until then. You can sufficiently justify pushing me there and perhaps trying to get people to agree with you if you use your words.

In post 1597, ssbm_Kyouko wrote: You could read the thread next time you're town before you lolhammer

Lolhammers are pretty badddd. They are kinda game throwing because it takes just a couple minutes to check votes.

In post 1553, Save The Dragons wrote:VOTE: gamma

This is what I was hoping for. Sorry Dragons.

In post 1599, Noraa wrote:I would say 99% of gambits like this come from town. Since this behavior repeatedly comes from town, the people that lim it are throwing imo. I hope theres no lim all liars stans here lol.

Like this is just… it’s indefensible. The gambit could be in a vacuum thought of as coming from a Town player. It’s incredibly sub-optimal regardless. No matter how often you say it, it just doesn’t make it true. You’re conveniently forgetting the part where they were wrong. It’s egregious.

In post 1604, Noraa wrote:

In post 1597, ssbm_Kyouko wrote: You could read the thread next time you're town before you lolhammer

Lolhammers are pretty badddd. They are kinda game throwing because it takes just a couple minutes to check votes.

You’re defending that shit because it happened against me and you just don’t like me. You can admit it.

But don’t act like it’s better than lolhammering. lol hammering is also very likely to come from Town. Scum don’t tend to be that careless. But where’s your excuse there?

There isn’t one because you think targeting players you dislike with shit gambits is sensible. It isn’t, and you should be ashamed for defending that position. Look at the Scum’s reaction, or Gamma’s reaction. Or STD’s. That’s the reaction of Town that has to deal with that shit in game.

And look - I voted correctly in Endgame and we would have actually won the game with some luck there. And I correctly pinpointed the Scummiest player, and I had praise for what you had put other there! Which means I did read. Maybe I had stuff happening in real life, you know, like I actually said I was going through. Like seriously just fuck you.

In post 1556, Andresvmb wrote:Following that little vote from Italiano I obviously would have voted there in ELo since clearly my vote for Max was correct. That’s unfortunate that I succeeded in not tunneling Gamma to still lose haha well it is what it is. I really can’t imagine that Max/Gamma are both Scum.

I genuinely thought this game was over and I was truly hoping that Dragons didn’t vote Max. If he did there was no combination of the f3 that would’ve not pointed to me imo.

In post 1566, Save The Dragons wrote:we could have but scum did a good job convincing me they weren't scum so shrug

Good game otherwise Dragons, sorry brother.

No matter how you slice it town gambits are stupid and you should get executed everytime.

In post 1611, ItalianoVD wrote:

In post 1556, Andresvmb wrote:Following that little vote from Italiano I obviously would have voted there in ELo since clearly my vote for Max was correct. That’s unfortunate that I succeeded in not tunneling Gamma to still lose haha well it is what it is. I really can’t imagine that Max/Gamma are both Scum.

I genuinely thought this game was over and I was truly hoping that Dragons didn’t vote Max. If he did there was no combination of the f3 that would’ve not pointed to me imo.

Yeah I mean if Dragons votes there correctly we do in fact always win. So the game had actually shrunk to a strict 50/50 with your vote. Which is why I also didn’t think it made sense. I would have bussed Fox hard as soon as I put a vote down in your position.

Terrible play doesn’t get it just punishment; too many people just brush it off like “oh that’s townie, whatever.” I’m of the lynch all liars and bad players camp. Even if its me I stand on that mantra and players should be punished for playing bad or lying. Period. If I was town I would not have been upset I would’ve thought “we’ll good for you” It’s probably harsh but that’s the only way for players to get better or not try things that would be detrimental to the town.

In post 1614, Andresvmb wrote:Yeah I mean if Dragons votes there correctly we do in fact always win. So the game had actually shrunk to a strict 50/50 with your vote. Which is why I also didn’t think it made sense. I would have bussed Fox hard as soon as I put a vote down in your position.

Yeah apart from the fact I don’t generally like bussing unless I really have to, I don’t think I would’ve been able to pull it off and it look realistic. I was gunning for Gamma the whole game, maybe for you it would’ve looked good for me but I’m not sure how it would’ve looked for Gamma or Dragons.

In post 1608, Andresvmb wrote:But don’t act like it’s better than lolhammering. lol hammering is also very likely to come from Town. Scum don’t tend to be that careless. But where’s your excuse there?

Scum lolhammer and pretend for it to have been an accident often. It didnt read like an accident. That combined with the lack of active scumhunting for Days on end, you were just as confirmed scum to me as I was to you when I claimed a guilty on you.

As in I was wrong, but had every reason to believe you were scum based on your play.

I think there are some gambits that when used properly can be effective. I think lying shouldn’t necessarily always be punished by the Town. But lying about an investigative result? Nah, that shit needs to get executed 100% of the time. It’s horrendous, selfish play. Not trying (which you couldn’t possibly argue I did through the entirety of the game if you actually read my analysis at the beginning of the last day) is not great, but we can’t all try super hard in every game we play and there’s games where people are bad. I’ve played some really bad games - we all have. It happens. It should never justify someone thinking that they’re so good that they can railroad a player with a fake result. It’s embarrassing that this shit needs to be explained.

In post 1617, ssbm_Kyouko wrote:As in I was wrong, but had every reason to believe you were scum based on your play.

You keep defending garbage. If you thought you could explain why I was Scum, then you should have tried that. We could have had a conversation, maybe you realize that you’re wrong. Or you give me a chance. Instead, you lock me into a position I can’t get out of. You’re claiming something about my role mechanically I know is incorrect. What the fuck did you expect?

And also, we had a guilty result one of the days, and the other day most of you ran VFP up incorrectly and I bought into the argument.

The sad part is I thought Kyouko you were Town and defended you early, and I sheeped you onto Italiano. Like you all act like I never tried playing the game or took any positions. It’s just flat out wrong.

I also called out Max for their play early in the game. You just want to not give me any credit because you’re desperately trying to justify really selfish play. Like I’m sorry but I don’t understand why you wouldn’t just apologize for doing that.

Sorry for being rude VFP. I got very determined to mislynch you. Perhaps too determined-- that was brash.

And let me be honest. Kyouko didn't throw in any case. Throwing requires intent to lose. Otherwise it's just a bad play.

^