Mafiascum.net

In post 1598, Chara wrote:

In post 1558, WhemeStar wrote:Also I really like Titus response to me I think I am going to lock town Titus for now

why are you voting White Fire, Wheme?

i don't like 1591.

Why? I like it. If you're curious, why not ask Shea about why he thinks Sigmund is a good vote.

In post 1583, notscience wrote:I still think wheme is scum but his wagon is an absolute dumpster fire

i don't get why disliking the wagon matters if you think Wheme is scum. does it make you doubt the Wheme read?

also are you voting Murdercat for an actual reason, or was it just a joke?

i'm not sure why this whole page in particular annoys me so much. there's some trying to get things done which i like, and then a lot of posts that don't seem to be trying to accomplish anything.

I'm still back on page 52 and honestly I do not have the energy to go deep rn.

Wagon on me was amusing, seems to have been the strongest all day by that point. I know it's a bad wagon and White Fires insistence on my wagon is questionable at best, I think I recall someone saying something about it.

Bingle wagon was funny, that ability got fired far too early imo but that seems to be a pattern exclusive to me, I'm a late firer, I will be looking closer at that wagon.

Apparently there's a wheme wagon building, I'm honestly like 1% brain so that's noted to look at later. Sigmund is doing absolutely nothing of note if even being present in the game. I'm reading Guill as decently town so for now I'm sheeping there.

I generally dislike sheeping, but it is what it is.

In post 1599, Thestatusquo wrote:why I think sigmund has been scummy but I think guillotinas TMI case is nonsense.

Guill likes those cases, didn't realise it was one of those.

Eh. My vote can stay there for a bit.

In post 1600, Titus wrote:

In post 1598, Chara wrote:

In post 1558, WhemeStar wrote:Also I really like Titus response to me I think I am going to lock town Titus for now

why are you voting White Fire, Wheme?

i don't like 1591.

Why? I like it. If you're curious, why not ask Shea about why he thinks Sigmund is a good vote.

i also think Sigmund is a good vote so i'm less interested in shea's reasons for thinking that, and more interested in shea's direction. i dunno, i'm in an ornery mood and that post was an example of commentary that feels directionless.

pressing it further crossed my mind but shea's v/la so that sort of post isn't necessarily terrible.

In post 1604, Chara wrote:

In post 1600, Titus wrote:

In post 1598, Chara wrote:

In post 1558, WhemeStar wrote:Also I really like Titus response to me I think I am going to lock town Titus for now

why are you voting White Fire, Wheme?

i don't like 1591.

Why? I like it. If you're curious, why not ask Shea about why he thinks Sigmund is a good vote.

i also think Sigmund is a good vote so i'm less interested in shea's reasons for thinking that, and more interested in shea's direction. i dunno, i'm in an ornery mood and that post was an example of commentary that feels directionless.

pressing it further crossed my mind but shea's v/la so that sort of post isn't necessarily terrible.

oog I don't have internet until thursday. pls pity me. i was not meant to live like this.

In post 1603, Flea The Magician wrote:

In post 1599, Thestatusquo wrote:why I think sigmund has been scummy but I think guillotinas TMI case is nonsense.

Guill likes those cases, didn't realise it was one of those.

Eh. My vote can stay there for a bit.

i think Guill believes it. there are more explanations than scum for Sigmund's view of the setup but i understand Guill's perspective.

i dunno, i guess i'm in a mood where i don't think it really matters if the case is good or not? like if you think Sigmund is scum the wagon is fine.

In post 1605, Thestatusquo wrote:oog I don't have internet until thursday. pls pity me. i was not meant to live like this.

get well soon.

i have a point with the post about guillotina and sigmund specifically but i don't want to talk about it yet because i want to see what happens first.

can i help the mood at all? here is a picture of me in a dinosaur onesie if that will help.

In post 1520, Thestatusquo wrote:

In post 1518, Ircher wrote:You're going to look ridiculous when I flip.

In my experience this is a statement mostly made by scum but frequently made by town as well.

I am the most helpful.

incredibly.

i don't like that Ircher said this to notscience, the player he's voting as scum. it doesn't feel like a real reaction.

shea: thank you, i find these dino onesies to be very agreeable.

In post 1396, Titus wrote:

In post 1394, Chara wrote:her play this game has so far been very "yeah, i see why Titus is doing that" which is a trait of town Titus.

There are quite a few who claim Titus is making sense, therefore she's scum. I hate that personally but it is there as an undercurrent.

How about me making sense makes me town?

i'm curious about what you thought of my response to this question, Titus.

In post 1589, Thestatusquo wrote:did I?

You said there weren't enough sheep

In post 1613, MURDERCAT wrote:

In post 1589, Thestatusquo wrote:did I?

You said there weren't enough sheep

So I did. I rarely think of you as a sheep generally speaking. why are you doing it here in particular?

In post 1612, Chara wrote:

In post 1396, Titus wrote:

In post 1394, Chara wrote:her play this game has so far been very "yeah, i see why Titus is doing that" which is a trait of town Titus.

There are quite a few who claim Titus is making sense, therefore she's scum. I hate that personally but it is there as an undercurrent.

How about me making sense makes me town?

i'm curious about what you thought of my response to this question, Titus.

Can you quote your response? I don't see it on the same page.

In post 1407, Chara wrote:

In post 1403, Bell wrote:How in the world do you have a good idea of how Titus plays Mafia when I've played with her over 10 times now and I still have no fucking clue what I'm looking at half the time.

i mean i've been playing mafia with her for like 5 years. she has a nonstandard playstyle. i know generally how she tends to behave and a trait of scum her is either making herself more "palatable" or obfuscating her methods she's harder to discredit. Titus can correct me here, maybe it's changed.

In post 1404, Bell wrote:Wait, is Fakran your brother or sister Chara?

neither. we were partners in Undertale S as Chara and Asriel, they are siblings in flavour, so we occasionally address each other as such. my signature is from the flavour.

was on the page right after.

In post 1401, Chara wrote:

In post 1396, Titus wrote:

In post 1394, Chara wrote:her play this game has so far been very "yeah, i see why Titus is doing that" which is a trait of town Titus.

There are quite a few who claim Titus is making sense, therefore she's scum. I hate that personally but it is there as an undercurrent.

How about me making sense makes me town?

scum Titus plays more to what she knows will get her what she wants, and town Titus plays to figuring things out. both Tituses make sense, i don't think scum Titus makes more sense in particular.
i have a good idea of how you play mafia by now and you haven't done anything i don't see town Titus deciding to do. paying attention to wagons and voting with the one you happen to like best with your reads rather than your biggest scumread is something i'd expect.

there was other stuff that pinged in your ISO before the Wheme read but i don't remember it offhand.

whoops, this was the first part. i meant to quote both.

I feel your analysis of my play is largely correct and gives me warm fuzzies that someone may get and respect me. Given the amount of usual Titus makes sense so that's worrying (at least Notty is honest about it), your view is refreshing. I have to worry about buddying but I largely like it as it is accurate.

well i'm happy you find it accurate. i think if i were scum it at least still means i understand how you play.

i am a bit concerned that you didn't see the response and were not concerned about my apparent lack of an answer, though.

brains

Will post later

In post 1619, Chara wrote:well i'm happy you find it accurate. i think if i were scum it at least still means i understand how you play.

i am a bit concerned that you didn't see the response and were not concerned about my apparent lack of an answer, though.

I was sick. I'm mostly better but occasionally I miss things when well and doubly so when sick. It's also possible that I thought it was right and just glossed over it. I'm not really sure what I was thinking.

In post 1620, Lady Lambdadelta wrote:brains

Will post later

A wild zombie has appeared.

In post 539, Thestatusquo wrote:

In post 529, Bell wrote:

In post 525, Thestatusquo wrote:I like disco Elysium

Me too, I could gush about it for up to an hour! Are you scum?
Roll for initiative.

Nah. And honestly i found your characterization of me as not hunting as kind of nonsense. I've already got several reads I'm pretty happy about which is more than i was expecting by page 20.

shea, could you talk about the reads you had at this point?

Unwnd can I keep one of the chickens and brain the old man if he refuses to give one up.