Mafiascum.net

In post 376, Bell wrote:

In post 373, Dwlee99 wrote:

In post 371, Bell wrote:*scum can you please nom Frogster king first as bomb guy.

Pedit: feels fake.

What does?

The part after your reads list where you talk to the air.

This part I dislike. I make comments that don’t appeal to anyone specific all the time. In fact, I’m pretty sure it’s a normal part of how a lot of players speak. Unless there’s a point in here specific to DW, I fail to understand this conclusion at all.

Just because I'm feeling cheeky: andres when you leave, do you mind asking Strange to return to the game thread with her completed readslist we've been waiting for? I know she's in there with you.

VOTE: StrangeMatter

In post 1599, Frogsterking wrote:Andres I have another question actually.

Over the last couple of hours you increased your post count from 6 to 36 and posted A LOT of observations about the thread, almost as though you've been reading along. Was there anything special about tonight that caused you to reveal your thoughts and increase the magnitude of your content by such a degree?

Yeah I started reading around midnight my time, because I had said I would read tonight. The simple reason is that I found some time and I enjoy playing mafia and I didn’t want to disappoint Datisi. I almost feel like I can’t be complete shit this game only so that I don’t make Datisi feel like I’m a bad player haha

In post 1601, Frogsterking wrote:Just because I'm feeling cheeky: andres when you leave, do you mind asking Strange to return to the game thread with her completed readslist we've been waiting for? I know she's in there with you.

VOTE: StrangeMatter

You’re arguing a little too hard for me as Scum and I don’t think I trust it at all. Like you’re not just reading me pretty badly, you’re also being somewhat overconfident about it.

I think it’s pretty obvious that you’re implying that I’m only posting a lot for some Scummy reason you’re not fully detailing. If you feel that way, you might as well say what that reason is.

If nothing else this exchange made me think Frogster is town.
I'm not sure they'd be willing to embarrass themselves like this as scum and I can't imagine them bussing a buddy like this either.
So that just leaves Frog town.

So that's cool.

Pedit: I know this is anti-town of me, but I'm not required to do this. They're just baiting you and you need to ignore it and go to sleep.

Can mafia make me defuser?
I really want touch bombs.

I'm not even sure it makes sense for you not to realize he's baiting you I'm pretty sure you've played more games of mafia than I have.
So I'm confused again.

Ignore me too, this is also bait in a fashion.

Also, 0/10 for inability to not listen to anyone and go blindly.

Maybe i WANT cut third wire, not first one like suspicious guy tells me.
So many lost potential.

I believe the rules state you have to follow their advice. No cutting the blue wire, if the adviser tells you to cut the red one.

In post 1608, Bell wrote:I'm not even sure it makes sense for you not to realize he's baiting you I'm pretty sure you've played more games of mafia than I have.
So I'm confused again.

Ignore me too, this is also bait in a fashion.

I interpreted the early part of the exchange as curiosity and skepticism which I felt was fair. At this point, I do realize it’s somewhat in bad faith.

In post 1604, Andresvmb wrote:I think it’s pretty obvious that you’re implying that I’m only posting a lot for some Scummy reason you’re not fully detailing. If you feel that way, you might as well say what that reason is.

K. Tell Strange I'm in here screaming for their head. I'm going to scum case them with the meta tells from the scum game they just completed with me pretty soon if I don't get that readslist. I did this same thing to them recently on D1 in a completed game from the newbie queue, so they'll know what to expect.

In post 1611, Andresvmb wrote:

In post 1608, Bell wrote:I'm not even sure it makes sense for you not to realize he's baiting you I'm pretty sure you've played more games of mafia than I have.
So I'm confused again.

Ignore me too, this is also bait in a fashion.

I interpreted the early part of the exchange as curiosity and skepticism which I felt was fair. At this point, I do realize it’s somewhat in bad faith.

That's probably because this might be the case.

Yea, exactly.

It would add spice, like "WE ALL CORRECTLY TOLD INTSTRUCTIONS BUT HE STILL MANAGED TO FUCK UP" or defuser ignoring instructions and somehow defusing, revealing someone lied.

Now it's just boring avalon with bombs.

Night all.

In post 1614, Enchant wrote:Yea, exactly.

It would add spice, like "WE ALL CORRECTLY TOLD INTSTRUCTIONS BUT HE STILL MANAGED TO FUCK UP" or defuser ignoring instructions and somehow defusing, revealing someone lied.

This is why I wanted you on my expert team Enchant but CSF vetoed it

In post 1613, Bell wrote:

In post 1611, Andresvmb wrote:

In post 1608, Bell wrote:I'm not even sure it makes sense for you not to realize he's baiting you I'm pretty sure you've played more games of mafia than I have.
So I'm confused again.

Ignore me too, this is also bait in a fashion.

I interpreted the early part of the exchange as curiosity and skepticism which I felt was fair. At this point, I do realize it’s somewhat in bad faith.

That's probably because this might be the case.

Bell have you not realized fire and andres are scum yet?

HEAL: Frogsterking

I'm town, I don't know who the scum are. I hope this helps. Bell out.

In post 1618, Frogsterking wrote:

In post 1613, Bell wrote:

In post 1611, Andresvmb wrote:

In post 1608, Bell wrote:I'm not even sure it makes sense for you not to realize he's baiting you I'm pretty sure you've played more games of mafia than I have.
So I'm confused again.

Ignore me too, this is also bait in a fashion.

I interpreted the early part of the exchange as curiosity and skepticism which I felt was fair. At this point, I do realize it’s somewhat in bad faith.

That's probably because this might be the case.

Bell have you not realized fire and andres are scum yet?

Are you going to be this obnoxious the whole game?

In post 1620, Andresvmb wrote:

In post 1618, Frogsterking wrote:

In post 1613, Bell wrote:

In post 1611, Andresvmb wrote:

In post 1608, Bell wrote:I'm not even sure it makes sense for you not to realize he's baiting you I'm pretty sure you've played more games of mafia than I have.
So I'm confused again.

Ignore me too, this is also bait in a fashion.

I interpreted the early part of the exchange as curiosity and skepticism which I felt was fair. At this point, I do realize it’s somewhat in bad faith.

That's probably because this might be the case.

Bell have you not realized fire and andres are scum yet?

Are you going to be this obnoxious the whole game?

Neither of us will be alive by tomorrow I imagine.

andres will you be a bro and give me a clue on the 4th one? I've been wracking my brains all day. I know it's NOT VP Baltar

In post 1621, Frogsterking wrote:

In post 1620, Andresvmb wrote:

In post 1618, Frogsterking wrote:

In post 1613, Bell wrote:

In post 1611, Andresvmb wrote:

In post 1608, Bell wrote:I'm not even sure it makes sense for you not to realize he's baiting you I'm pretty sure you've played more games of mafia than I have.
So I'm confused again.

Ignore me too, this is also bait in a fashion.

I interpreted the early part of the exchange as curiosity and skepticism which I felt was fair. At this point, I do realize it’s somewhat in bad faith.

That's probably because this might be the case.

Bell have you not realized fire and andres are scum yet?

Are you going to be this obnoxious the whole game?

Neither of us will be alive by tomorrow I imagine.

andres will you be a bro and give me a clue on the 4th one? I've been wracking my brains all day. I know it's NOT VP Baltar

Yeah I’ll stop interacting with you. You’re overconfident and wrong and I find that kind of aggravating and I would rather focus on actually catching up since that’s better for my own sanity.

When I do flip Town though, if we do play again, I will keep reminding you of how shit you are at reading me.

apologies for filling up the thread with what i falsely hoped could be a productive conversation, feel kinda bad that people are going to read through all of that only to end up seeing it's just frog being frog

In post 1621, Frogsterking wrote:

In post 1620, Andresvmb wrote:

In post 1618, Frogsterking wrote:

In post 1613, Bell wrote:

In post 1611, Andresvmb wrote:

In post 1608, Bell wrote:I'm not even sure it makes sense for you not to realize he's baiting you I'm pretty sure you've played more games of mafia than I have.
So I'm confused again.

Ignore me too, this is also bait in a fashion.

I interpreted the early part of the exchange as curiosity and skepticism which I felt was fair. At this point, I do realize it’s somewhat in bad faith.

That's probably because this might be the case.

Bell have you not realized fire and andres are scum yet?

Are you going to be this obnoxious the whole game?

Neither of us will be alive by tomorrow I imagine.

andres will you be a bro and give me a clue on the 4th one? I've been wracking my brains all day. I know it's NOT VP Baltar

The only way you live to see D2 andres is if Strange doesn't show up here with her "huge" readslist by the time this town gets sick of me screaming at them and posting this gif.

So on second thought, if survival is really that important to you, maybe you SHOULDN'T mention to Strange in the scum PT what's going on.