Mafiascum.net

What does that even mean?

Just shut up :/

How hard was that to understand. I said promise me you aren't scum. You couldn't ergo I have caught a scum!

There's something that's bothering me a lot in this game thus far, and I figure I might as well flesh it out now.

It seems that some in this game are ready to lynch people because of their playstyle rather than their scumminess.

In brief: "I want to lynch Player X because they're posting fluff."

Player X: "I always fluff on Day 1. THere's not nearly as much to go on."

Player Y: "I don't like that. In principle,

Player X: "I've already told you that's what I do on Day 1."

Player Y: "Fine. Then I'm going to try to get you lynched for it."

Bothers the hell out of me.

In post 1575, Nero Cain wrote:Well that's pretty obvious, TAM.

That was mom who said that Nero

Mom and I are going to have a long talk about this game when she and I are next on.

In post 1592, Fuzzyman wrote:Woah, what the fuck just happened here?

In post 0, Nexus wrote:

No cults. No bastard modding. No jesters. No lynchers.

In post 1572, Nero Cain wrote:yes, I'm john Cena-compulsive lyncher. I have a new target and I must get them lynched each day or I loose. Today my target is Goat so pls help me fulfill part of my wincon.

Unvote

Vote: Nero Cain

Nero brings up a good point in regards to Dr. C. He was the first one on the Krab wagon and advocated that lynch for all of day one, but once the vote count was reset, he's been content to just sit on his vote and cheer on that wagon from the sidelines. In the immortal words of The Hurricane, "Whassupwitdat?"

In post 1565, Nero Cain wrote:The amished tell is a mixed bag since I've seen both town and scum flip for it.

Alright, fair enough. I'll admit that part of the reason I pointed it out is because I just learned what the Amished tell is in my first game and I just wanted to show off a little. So, yeah.

In post 1612, Svenskt Stål wrote:Day 1 is kinda over, i am pleased with the progress

Ditto. It's been a long day one and we got a lot of shit done, but I'm ready for a break. Looking forward to turning my brain off and doing nothing for a few days when night one gets here.

In post 1627, The Goat wrote:There's something that's bothering me a lot in this game thus far, and I figure I might as well flesh it out now.

It seems that some in this game are ready to lynch people because of their playstyle rather than their scumminess.

In brief: "I want to lynch Player X because they're posting fluff."

Player X: "I always fluff on Day 1. THere's not nearly as much to go on."

Player Y: "I don't like that. In principle,

vote Player X.

Player X: "I've already told you that's what I do on Day 1."

Player Y: "Fine. Then I'm going to try to get you lynched for it."

Bothers the hell out of me.

You know what bothers the hell out of People who use meta to wave away any incriminating behavior that they exhibit. Meta isn't a magic wand that you can twirl around in the air to transform all your poor actions into good actions. You might as well be saying that your meta is the only reason people are suspicious of you right now. "Don't vote for me because I've been scummy! That's just my meta!"

Give me a friggin' break.

In post 1630, Skullduggery wrote:You know what bothers the hell out of me? People who use meta to wave away any incriminating behavior that they exhibit. Meta isn't a magic wand that you can twirl around in the air to transform all your poor actions into good actions. You might as well be saying that your meta is the only reason people are suspicious of you right now. "Don't vote for me because I've been scummy! That's just my meta!"

Give me a friggin' break.

That's not even close to what I'm saying, and you know it.

What I'm saying is that I feel as though people are voting for me It bothers me. I'm sorry if you don't like that I said it, but last I checked, I have a right to.

Or...wait. What are you gonna do...vote for me HARDER?

Give me a break.

Maybe I'm being obtuse, but this is something that probably goes back farther than this game.

I absolutely cannot stand the "you're not pushing people, or trying to analyze minutia, or calling someone scum because they forgot to use an apostrophe on Day One" line of thinking.

Posting fluff is

Enhance your calm, goatface. Dr. Shelby is gonna make us hug it out if we keep this up, and I don't want to do that because you smell funny.

Okay, how about this. Krab Bucket was ludicrously scummy, and Mutley hasn't done much to change that. That slot needs to die. If Malcolm really is a Vigilante or whatever he's been hinting at, it sounds like he intends to solve our Goat problem tonight. I'll switch my vote over to Mutley to lend my support to that wagon. If Malcolm shoots you tonight and you happen to flip Town, I promise I'll put on my singlet, lace up my boots, slather myself in way too much baby oil, and do battle with Malcolm tomorrow. Sound good?

In post 1620, Darthe wrote:

In post 1608, Mutleyddmc wrote:Triple post here not posts. Erm the main scum tell wasn't TE mistaken identity but the mourning part of the post. It's like he shooting about the kill.

I have no idea what the fuck you're trying to say.

¨lets not forget this fucking lurker people. darthe needs pressure day 2.

In post 1603, Nero Cain wrote:PA, what is your Goat read?

I don't have a town read on him right now but he's not my first choice to lynch. His posts are deteriorating a bit from early game in glancing through his ISO, but it's not clear to me that his interaction with GCBC was way scummy. If that fake vig claim had tipped him off about GCBC being rival scum there were less conspicuous ways to crumb his support of the triple power jump to his teammates without leaving himself on the wagon. It actually seems like 25 pages go by between GCBC's fake action and the daykill. If The Goat knew his faction had the option to eliminate GCBC during the day, why jump so quickly?

I don't like his latest posting on how he thinks if people say their playstyle is scummy they should get a pass. If your playstyle looks scummy and you can't make it work for you, change it or accept that you're going to spend a lot of time on defense. Like I said, my vote's not going there, but I'm not inclined to grump at people if he ends up being lynched.

i'm back and disappointed to see the thread is just mostly the same 6 or so posters and don't have the time or patience to do anything detailed

In post 1592, Fuzzyman wrote:Woah, what the fuck just happened here?

In post 0, Nexus wrote:

No cults. No bastard modding. No jesters. No lynchers.

In post 1572, Nero Cain wrote:yes, I'm john Cena-compulsive lyncher. I have a new target and I must get them lynched each day or I loose. Today my target is Goat so pls help me fulfill part of my wincon.

Unvote

Vote: Nero Cain

luckily this guy makes it easy for me

VOTE: fuzzyman

In post 1633, Skullduggery wrote:Enhance your calm, goatface. Dr. Shelby is gonna make us hug it out if we keep this up, and I don't want to do that because you smell funny.

Okay, how about this. Krab Bucket was ludicrously scummy, and Mutley hasn't done much to change that. That slot needs to die. If Malcolm really is a Vigilante or whatever he's been hinting at, it sounds like he intends to solve our Goat problem tonight. I'll switch my vote over to Mutley to lend my support to that wagon.

If Malcolm shoots you tonight and you happen to flip Town, I promise I'll put on my singlet, lace up my boots, slather myself in way too much baby oil, and do battle with Malcolm tomorrow. Sound good?

Now you're just flirting.

Deal.

In post 1635, penguin_alien wrote:change it or accept that you're going to spend a lot of time on defense. Like I said, my vote's not going there, but I'm not inclined to grump at people if he ends up being lynched.

I'm a tad stubborn.

In post 1633, Skullduggery wrote:Enhance your calm, goatface. Dr. Shelby is gonna make us hug it out if we keep this up, and

I don't want to do that because you smell funny

.

Actually, back that train up a sec, manipulation nation. Have you LOOKED at your avatar? You look like you would smell of a a hodgepodge of patchouli, vanilla, and death.

In post 1636, petapan wrote:i'm back and disappointed to see the thread is just mostly the same 6 or so posters and don't have the time or patience to do anything detailed

In post 1592, Fuzzyman wrote:Woah, what the fuck just happened here?

In post 0, Nexus wrote:

No cults. No bastard modding. No jesters. No lynchers.

In post 1572, Nero Cain wrote:yes, I'm john Cena-compulsive lyncher. I have a new target and I must get them lynched each day or I loose. Today my target is Goat so pls help me fulfill part of my wincon.

Unvote

Vote: Nero Cain

luckily this guy makes it easy for me

VOTE: fuzzyman

wtf are you doing? wow

i like how malcolm went quiet once the wagpn dropped and that he has since then done zilch.

I lied, I dont like it.

In post 1540, Mutleyddmc wrote: Tp answer a question its very general on you point about malcolm. Doesn't necassarily regard malolm. Scum have to look town, so what better way than some indepth analysis etc?

True, but doesn't really affect my read on them.
It is interesting though that you say I'm being general on Malcolm when your reads list was this:

In post 1534, Mutleyddmc wrote: Reads:
Desperado - a bit uptight and needs to relax but yer he is strong town
sven - not uptight good town if he and desp got along it could be useful for us
skull - like if those two had a love child.
Monkeyman - I like monkeys and I like you

You're cute when you're angry, Goat.

UNVOTE:
VOTE: Mutleyddmc

In post 1639, The Goat wrote:You look like you would smell of a a hodgepodge of patchouli, vanilla, and death.

, my dear goatface. I smell like patchouli, vanilla, and .

In post 1642, Ravenpaw wrote:

In post 1540, Mutleyddmc wrote: Tp answer a question its very general on you point about malcolm. Doesn't necassarily regard malolm. Scum have to look town, so what better way than some indepth analysis etc?

True, but doesn't really affect my read on them.
It is interesting though that you say I'm being general on Malcolm when your reads list was this:

In post 1534, Mutleyddmc wrote: Reads:
Desperado - a bit uptight and needs to relax but yer he is strong town
sven - not uptight good town if he and desp got along it could be useful for us
skull - like if those two had a love child.
Monkeyman - I like monkeys and I like you

I didn't say you were being general, sorry if you misunderstood. I meant what I was saying was a very general point about mafia, that scum have to look town so what better way than posting in depth analysis. I read it back now and I see it came across as me saying your point was general

Ferret pretty much refused to promise he isnt scum. How are we not lynching him?

In post 1592, Fuzzyman wrote:Woah, what the fuck just happened here?

In post 0, Nexus wrote:

No cults. No bastard modding. No jesters. No lynchers.

In post 1572, Nero Cain wrote:yes, I'm john Cena-compulsive lyncher. I have a new target and I must get them lynched each day or I loose. Today my target is Goat so pls help me fulfill part of my wincon.

Unvote

Vote: Nero Cain

...what? I really don't like this. It was pretty clear that he was joking. I doubt anything is going to come of this today, but I'll throw my vote down here for now.



My vote probably won't stay there, but at this moment of time it feels right.

At work right now though so I can't do much more. Going to do some ISO-ing of our current vote leaders on my lunch break, and the rest when I get home and see what I can find.

In post 1646, TheEsquire wrote:At work right now though so I can't do much more. Going to do some ISO-ing of our current vote leaders on my lunch break, and the rest when I get home and see what I can find.

Why are you doing this if you want a fuzzy lynch?

In post 1646, TheEsquire wrote:At work right now though so I can't do much more. Going to do some ISO-ing of our current vote leaders on my lunch break, and the rest when I get home and see what I can find.

Why are you doing this if you want a fuzzy lynch?

In post 1647, Nero Cain wrote:

In post 1646, TheEsquire wrote:At work right now though so I can't do much more. Going to do some ISO-ing of our current vote leaders on my lunch break, and the rest when I get home and see what I can find.

Why are you doing this if you want a fuzzy lynch?

I don't rule out any possibilities. Everyone else is making cases about other people, so I figured I should see if after some personal investigation I agree with another case more. Fuzzy doesn't have a lot of content in here, so I don't exactly have a lot to go off of, so another lynch may be more favourable. If I don't find anything that peaks my interest, my vote stays on Fuzzy. Simple as that.

That said, we aren't having a no lynch today. If I have to compromise my position to ensure we get a flip, I'll do it.