Page 66 of 85

Posted: Sat Nov 01, 2014 10:58 am
by shos
Also I'll give up three balls if there are 4 scum in a 13 p game.

Posted: Sat Nov 01, 2014 11:06 am
by Doctor Who
shos wrote:Also I'll give up three balls if there are 4 scum in a 13 p game.


The joat was also active bulletproof. All I am saying is that it is possible.

I will ISO beck now. If we do massclaim I would feel better if the other mason chose the order.

Posted: Sat Nov 01, 2014 11:43 am
by Doctor Who
Beck had blinders on prolapsed brain since PB's first post, but then never really made an effort to convince others. If something worked in a bunch of games at the start of day 1 then that would be pretty easy to go back and find. Seemed a little lazy in looking for other suspects. Strikes me a lot like ika - it is my way or the highway. Beck strikes me as null. What did you see in beck that gave you a protown read?

Posted: Sat Nov 01, 2014 2:23 pm
by ika
doesnt see BBT getting voted/lynched
doesnt see shos geting voted/lynched
doesnt see titus geting voted/lynched
doesnt see ika geting voted/lynhced

continues lurking

Posted: Sat Nov 01, 2014 3:06 pm
by Formerfish
Doctor Who wrote:
shos wrote:Also I'll give up three balls if there are 4 scum in a 13 p game.


The joat was also active bulletproof. All I am saying is that it is possible.

I will ISO beck now. If we do massclaim I would feel better if the other mason chose the order.


You know, one of my top 3 arguments to have with people is the idea of probable v. possible. Like in this case, while it is possible that there are 4 scum in the game the probability of that being true are next to none.

So now we have to look at your reasoning for pointing out that there is a possibility of 4 scumbags in the game. Are you trying to fear monger the group into making a rash decision? Are you trying to spread the mist and make town think that scum are everywhere around us? Are you scum trying to sow misinformation and distrust? Are you just out of things to say and felt like you needed to say something, anything, even if it made little to no sense?

Posted: Sat Nov 01, 2014 5:52 pm
by Titus
shos wrote:claims should include role, flavor, and past actions.
order of claims, imo:
1. Titus(already claimed, but better to have everything in one place)
2. Doctor Who (past grayfoxxx slot; this needs to be)
3-4. formerfish/natirasha
5. Green Crayons
6. BBT
7. ika (I think that by reading beck, everyone can agree to this)
8. shos(I can confirm myself, 99%. so I think this info should come after scum fakeclaim)
9. geraintm (already claimed and proved mason. for the sake of completeness)


pedit:
yes, you can. but what is your opinion on massclaim.?


Nope. You aren't getting the opportunity to fakeclaim scumbo. You BBT Formerfish and ika claim.

Posted: Sat Nov 01, 2014 6:25 pm
by Formerfish
Formerfish wrote:I've already full claimed.


Reading comprehension is a thing.

Posted: Sat Nov 01, 2014 7:46 pm
by shos
Eh sure, why not.
I am a VT, dealer. As there was no VT role PM published, and as I crumbed before the first flip, I should be conftown.

Posted: Sat Nov 01, 2014 7:47 pm
by shos
shos wrote:
Don't do drugs kids
:cop: and eat yiur vegetables.

Get it? Drug dealer?

Posted: Sat Nov 01, 2014 11:21 pm
by BlueBloodedToffee
Tourist - 2-Shot Commuter.

Posted: Sun Nov 02, 2014 4:07 am
by shos
I belive this.

Posted: Sun Nov 02, 2014 4:19 am
by Titus
shos wrote:Eh sure, why not.
I am a VT, dealer. As there was no VT role PM published, and as I crumbed before the first flip, I should be conftown.


Like scum would not be told what VTs are :roll:

Posted: Sun Nov 02, 2014 4:20 am
by Titus
Formerfish wrote:
Formerfish wrote:I've already full claimed.


Reading comprehension is a thing.


It is. But since you were on shos's list...figured it best not to quibble

I wish I was a vig

Posted: Sun Nov 02, 2014 4:21 am
by Titus
Doctor Who wrote:
shos wrote:Also I'll give up three balls if there are 4 scum in a 13 p game.


The joat was also active bulletproof. All I am saying is that it is possible.

I will ISO beck now. If we do massclaim I would feel better if the other mason chose the order.

BlueBloodedToffee wrote:Tourist - 2-Shot Commuter.

shos wrote:I belive this.

Why

Bulletproof and commuter tend not to be in the same game. The only reason it is possible is bc of both being active.

Posted: Sun Nov 02, 2014 4:25 am
by ika
BBT role is like a direct counter to eggs role (doc/rolecop/BP/roleblock)

Posted: Sun Nov 02, 2014 4:27 am
by Titus
Not to mention a counter to parts of mine.

Posted: Sun Nov 02, 2014 4:29 am
by Titus
Ika, trusting you here but I would rather keep something in reserve than mc. This might be a mistake. I am twice half an agent.

Posted: Sun Nov 02, 2014 4:31 am
by ika
Titus wrote:Ika, trusting you here but I would rather keep something in reserve than mc. This might be a mistake. I am twice half an agent.


titus i quit listening to you the moemnt you scum read me. anything you say to me at this point is meaningless you though i was scum you never fucking voted me shut up and vote me already

Posted: Sun Nov 02, 2014 4:36 am
by Titus
I don't think you are scum anymore. Otherwise I would not have claimed to you.

Posted: Sun Nov 02, 2014 5:02 am
by Green Crayons
I'm not familiar with scum being told VT flavor without the town being told as well (which I think is different from scum being given "free"/available fakeclaims by the mod, which I think is different).

So I believe shos.

I'm not familiar with commuter. Wiki says it's basically only a town role, so do Titus and ika think that BBT is a scum-commuter or just lying about his role?

Posted: Sun Nov 02, 2014 5:08 am
by ika
Green Crayons wrote:I'm not familiar with scum being told VT flavor without the town being told as well (which I think is different from scum being given "free"/available fakeclaims by the mod, which I think is different).

So I believe shos.

I'm not familiar with commuter. Wiki says it's basically only a town role, so do Titus and ika think that BBT is a scum-commuter or just lying about his role?


wiki
Because they cannot use Night actions,
almost all
Commuters are pro-Town.


i can see both, his play dictated hes not a VT.

i think hes just scum, im still waiting for my myslynch.

Posted: Sun Nov 02, 2014 5:09 am
by ika
titus can also be scum

i wouldnt be surprised by it though

Posted: Sun Nov 02, 2014 5:28 am
by Titus
Green Crayons wrote:I'm not familiar with scum being told VT flavor without the town being told as well (which I think is different from scum being given "free"/available fakeclaims by the mod, which I think is different).

So I believe shos.

I'm not familiar with commuter. Wiki says it's basically only a town role, so do Titus and ika think that BBT is a scum-commuter or just lying about his role?


I wouldn't put it past Majiffy to have a scum commuter given the power town has. It is more likely that BBT is scum though.


Ika, you do understand my crumb to you right? I want to make sure so you can claim for me in case my claim is required while I am VLA.

Posted: Sun Nov 02, 2014 5:31 am
by Titus
Green Crayons wrote:I'm not familiar with scum being told VT flavor without the town being told as well (which I think is different from scum being given "free"/available fakeclaims by the mod, which I think is different).

So I believe shos.

I'm not familiar with commuter. Wiki says it's basically only a town role, so do Titus and ika think that BBT is a scum-commuter or just lying about his role?


If scum were not told VTs are dealers then

A) Scum were removed VTs as fakeclaims

OR

B) Early scum claimers are PRs

OR

C) Scum wanted massclaim once they figured out VT pm so they can all act as dealers


I am not a fan of scum not being able to fake VT from the start. That's poor mod design.

Posted: Sun Nov 02, 2014 5:44 am
by Titus
Ace of spades quickwagoned as counter to Desp. Cannot get wagon.

Shos says scum were not told VT flavor...DW come on man.