I'll directly respond to your VCA in a moment, but here's why I'm not scum:
If I was scum, you would be dead
. I have two reasons in support of this:
1. I suspected you were the mason
When you look through my ISO, you'll see that 1) I was confident you were an important role, and 2) I knew you weren't the JOAT. I did everything I could to tell you I thought you were the mason without actually saying it bcz you were adamant that the mason should stay hidden. When someone asked about Eve claiming mason, you'll see that I corrected them by saying gobble guessed Eve was mason and Eve didn't deny it. My defence of the JOAT staying hidden was bcz I thought Eve
2. You've been tunneling me literally all game
You have been unrelenting from day 1. I don't like 1v1s + I prefer to use teamwork to win. Your tunneling on me this game has been so annoying that even if I didn't think you were the mason, I'd have killed you way earlier.
As to why you should vote Egix, he's playing a reactive game. Most of my gameplay has been proactive. You can see for yourself if your just read our respective ISOs.
Wrong. STRQ = gobble.
Two dead, two scum suspects.
BP scum is chain sawing Chronos
EP is voting dead slot (BSG is Eve)
You know these are RVS votes, right?
My reasoning for voting BSG was because I didn't know what it stood for. BP voted Chronos because he doesn't like Titans. "Chainsawing" is a major stretch there.
I can't believe this and the "BP+EP connection" formed the basis for such a strong scumread against me.
Who is scum Egix? You haven't voiced any reads yet.
If you plan to re:read before, when?
don't you have any guts either?
VOTE: Alimdia
^ This is whom I'm most sure of, with gobble in second.
I did a quick-and-dirty reread yesterday, as I summarised in 1574.
What?
What what?
I think that everyone else is some degree of town. Who could I be missing out on? Stott?
Besides, I think it's pretty indicting that pkop was able to safely claim a "went nowhere" result on Alim.
What do you call a townbeard who's more useful than your mason?
I'll vote Egix once we assess alimdia's claim.
Edited with more colours to really spell it out for you.
Voting after a guilty doesn't matter. That day was all about a guilty or the legitimacy thereof. I had tunneled Pisskop before Eve made up a guilty. Doubting a liar is absolutely normal.
I'll directly respond to your VCA in a moment, but here's why I'm not scum:
If I was scum, you would be dead
. I have two reasons in support of this:
1. I suspected you were the mason
When you look through my ISO, you'll see that 1) I was confident you were an important role, and 2) I knew you weren't the JOAT. I did everything I could to tell you I thought you were the mason without actually saying it bcz you were adamant that the mason should stay hidden. When someone asked about Eve claiming mason, you'll see that I corrected them by saying gobble guessed Eve was mason and Eve didn't deny it. My defence of the JOAT staying hidden was bcz I thought Eve
2. You've been tunneling me literally all game
You have been unrelenting from day 1. I don't like 1v1s + I prefer to use teamwork to win. Your tunneling on me this game has been so annoying that even if I didn't think you were the mason, I'd have killed you way earlier.
As to why you should vote Egix, he's playing a reactive game. Most of my gameplay has been proactive. You can see for yourself if your just read our respective ISOs.
its slightly WIFOM. claim coming.
Posted: Fri May 01, 2020 7:32 pm
by alimdia
Firstly, Egix's claim uses info that is already commonly known.
Secondly, if we think about it, Egix being scum makes sense because that wagon yesterday on pisskop...
Also I can say that with Egix chilled last day,
IF
Egix was town, then that means that there was 5 town and 3 scum that could vote.
TO get 5 votes for a majority, with pisskop being scum, all 5 town would have to vote pisskop, unless theres some bussing, which I wouldn't see why scum would bus when it would take a literal all town wagon to lynch pisskop.
Now... the wagon on pisskop would never get to 5 votes without me, because I'm town. The reason why I'm not on the wagon will soon be apparent
Hence, Egix has to be scum.
Posted: Fri May 01, 2020 7:34 pm
by alimdia
I'm not 100% sure if I want to full claim or not, since the info that I have (I'd like to think) is pretty obvious.
And scum knowing my full role might cause them to be able to be more 'brave' about things.
Titus, you decide. Do I need to claim today in order for us to vote Egix? And are you still tunneled on EP?
I'll drop a small snippet. I targeted you last night.
What do you call a townbeard who's more useful than your mason?
I'll vote Egix once we assess alimdia's claim.
Edited with more colours to really spell it out for you.
Voting after a guilty doesn't matter. That day was all about a guilty or the legitimacy thereof. I had tunneled Pisskop before Eve made up a guilty. Doubting a liar is absolutely normal.
There it is. The "context" of your vote suddenly matters when the VCA narrative doesn't go your way. You'd probably be able to see that if you weren't blinded by hypocrisy and delusion.
I'll directly respond to your VCA in a moment, but here's why I'm not scum:
If I was scum, you would be dead
. I have two reasons in support of this:
1. I suspected you were the mason
When you look through my ISO, you'll see that 1) I was confident you were an important role, and 2) I knew you weren't the JOAT. I did everything I could to tell you I thought you were the mason without actually saying it bcz you were adamant that the mason should stay hidden. When someone asked about Eve claiming mason, you'll see that I corrected them by saying gobble guessed Eve was mason and Eve didn't deny it. My defence of the JOAT staying hidden was bcz I thought Eve
2. You've been tunneling me literally all game
You have been unrelenting from day 1. I don't like 1v1s + I prefer to use teamwork to win. Your tunneling on me this game has been so annoying that even if I didn't think you were the mason, I'd have killed you way earlier.
As to why you should vote Egix, he's playing a reactive game. Most of my gameplay has been proactive. You can see for yourself if your just read our respective ISOs.
its slightly WIFOM. claim coming.
The WIFOM is offset by the numerous posts I made about Titus' role. I can quote them if you'd like.
Posted: Fri May 01, 2020 7:40 pm
by alimdia
I feel like I would be exposing my claim and the info that scum don't know yet, while Egix has provided a claim that.... is just info everyone technically knows, but may or may not be true.
Posted: Fri May 01, 2020 7:48 pm
by EspressoPatronum
In post 1640, alimdia wrote:Firstly, Egix's claim uses info that is already commonly known.
Secondly, if we think about it, Egix being scum makes sense because that wagon yesterday on pisskop...
Also I can say that with Egix chilled last day,
IF
Egix was town, then that means that there was 5 town and 3 scum that could vote.
TO get 5 votes for a majority, with pisskop being scum, all 5 town would have to vote pisskop, unless theres some bussing, which I wouldn't see why scum would bus when it would take a literal all town wagon to lynch pisskop.
This is a great point! I hadn't thought of the numbers required for the lynch.
Now... the wagon on pisskop would never get to 5 votes without me, because I'm town. The reason why I'm not on the wagon will soon be apparent
Hence, Egix has to be scum.
In light of your above post and Egix's claim, I'm comfortable voting Egix regardless of your full claim.
You should assess the prospects of your full claim with the following in mind: Titus will probably die tonight. As an undisputed mason, she's almost guaranteed to die.
If I were you, I would consider fullclaiming if it benefitted from any of the following:
1. It might buy Titus another night bcz you're somehow a bigger threat to scum,
2. You might buy yourself a free night because Titus will take the night kill, or
3. You have information that we absolutely need before you die.
If your claim doesn't achieve or benefit from any of the above, you can probably wait another day. For curiosity's sake, I'd like to hear your claim, but it may not be necessary from a mechanical standpoint.
Posted: Fri May 01, 2020 8:20 pm
by alimdia
Me not claiming could possibly buying Titus another night.
I will say that Eve went full rogue though lol
VOTE: Egix
Posted: Fri May 01, 2020 8:21 pm
by alimdia
L-1
Posted: Fri May 01, 2020 8:41 pm
by EspressoPatronum
Intent to hammer.
Heading to sleep now. I'll lock it in if he's still alive in about 8 hours.