Posted: Wed Dec 02, 2020 3:14 pm
>:(
https://forum.mafiascum-staging.net/
>:(
What were you feeling different about here?In post 1278, borkjerfkin wrote:Mean mostly around the Prism wagon, and the "oh you want me to read the wagon about the player who is at F-2, what a bother"In post 1274, fferyllt wrote:I'm not sure what you mean about low inpact vs high impact times.
I'm rereading and am reacting a little more charitably around the interaction w/ Elements; I had filed away that he didn't really follow-up on that interaction but not true actually
Eh, I'm feeling different about it on reread; circa 1039 that's where I was at
shoo
I don't know what you're asking?In post 1629, borkjerfkin wrote:Now that you've turned my question into a question can you explain what you meant?
you just completely ignored this?In post 1623, borkjerfkin wrote:now that what?In post 1612, fferyllt wrote:Cabd's townreading bork but ehhhhh I don't know what I think now.
rephrase: it won't be a good look.In post 1628, skitter30 wrote:i mean i take issue with 'it's not a good look'
Yeah that's fine.In post 1632, borkjerfkin wrote:tomorrow night around this time probably; never really gonna before then Mon-Thu
Was trying to pick back up where we left off last night.In post 1633, borkjerfkin wrote:you just completely ignored this?In post 1623, borkjerfkin wrote:now that what?In post 1612, fferyllt wrote:Cabd's townreading bork but ehhhhh I don't know what I think now.
You realize that if I did this it would be as worthless at predicting what I think of your 2020+ meta trajectory as I can possibly make it?In post 1636, Cabd wrote:Might just hunt and peck and snipe at shit tomorrow.
Unless Ffery writes me a tribute slash fic.
y notIn post 1634, fferyllt wrote:rephrase: it won't be a good look.In post 1628, skitter30 wrote:i mean i take issue with 'it's not a good look'
I think I had reread up to about page 18 or so at the point where I posted that. As the game was unfolding, starting around page 15 I was still reading in more or less real time but I wasn't taking much of anything in. Maybe I'm never going to feel confident about that section of the thread because I wasn't poking at stuff as it happened.In post 1638, borkjerfkin wrote:at 792 you seemed to be on the cusp, i'm just not sure how I went to no man's land
notsci has demonstrated that he can still read me in year of our lord 2020.In post 1641, skitter30 wrote:y notIn post 1634, fferyllt wrote:rephrase: it won't be a good look.In post 1628, skitter30 wrote:i mean i take issue with 'it's not a good look'
Sure.In post 1642, fferyllt wrote:Do you feel like you've towned it up such that I should be seeing a townbork beacon?
I was actually talking about illicit.In post 1644, Cabd wrote:What? He clearly townread syr. Your posts and Tammy's posts were obvscum but syr shone bright enough anyways.
I don't. Not yet, anyway. Maybe I'm just too damn lost in the weeds. kinda feels that way. I wanted a stake in the ground. Cabd noped and Syr left me standing.In post 1645, borkjerfkin wrote:Sure.In post 1642, fferyllt wrote:Do you feel like you've towned it up such that I should be seeing a townbork beacon?
Your move