Mafiascum.net

Well I'm glad they killed Nero.

I'll actually be able to play this weekend.

In post 1623, Save The Dragons wrote:why did they kill nero lol

That's what I'm trying to figure out. I guess there were never any universal townreads though.

I think we just go Titus.
Scum killing Nero show either a threat there or setting up Titus more. However, I don't think they target Nero as a protective PR, meaning that this wasn't a consideration when killing and most likely means Titus is lying.

VOTE: Titus

In post 1623, Save The Dragons wrote:why did they kill nero lol

To help the town?

In post 1627, VFP wrote:I think we just go Titus.
Scum killing Nero show either a threat there or setting up Titus more. However, I don't think they target Nero as a protective PR, meaning that this wasn't a consideration when killing and most likely means Titus is lying.

VOTE: Titus

Lying about what?

Unfortunately I’m somewhat impaired right now. I’ll post once I recover, most likely tomorrow.

In post 1623, Save The Dragons wrote:why did they kill nero lol

either because he was right or because he was loud but it's still a lolzy kill

I thought peta was gonna die personally.

i regret a lot of things about my approach day 1 but ultimately we killed a VT who wasn't playing the game and that is an overall very decent outcome for day 1


VOTE: VFP

In post 1627, VFP wrote:I think we just go Titus.
Scum killing Nero show either a threat there or setting up Titus more. However, I don't think they target Nero as a protective PR, meaning that this wasn't a consideration when killing and most likely means Titus is lying.

VOTE: Titus

How do you feel about nom's slot now?

In post 1626, Dwlee99 wrote:

In post 1623, Save The Dragons wrote:why did they kill nero lol

That's what I'm trying to figure out. I guess there were never any universal townreads though.

It's possible they thought he was a PR. Or a vig got him and the scum kill was blocked (if Titus is being honest and we extrapolate that to mean there is a babysitter(s))

In post 1629, DrippingGoofball wrote:Lying about what?

In post 1430, Titus wrote:I am a babysitter enabler

The kill suggests that this isn't true.

In post 1634, Dragon of the West wrote:How do you feel about nom's slot now?

I'm not touching it.
If it was a tactical replace out I'm reporting it.

In post 1636, VFP wrote:

In post 1629, DrippingGoofball wrote:Lying about what?

In post 1430, Titus wrote:I am a babysitter enabler

The kill suggests that this isn't true.

Are you suggesting that if someone dies there can't be a babysitter?

In post 1638, Dwlee99 wrote:Are you suggesting that if someone dies there can't be a babysitter?

Not at all.
I already explained this. The kill suggests that scum wasn't in the mindset of looking for a babysitter.

I don't agree that scum would have to be in the mindset of looking for a baby sitter if there is one.

It's possible that Nero was a vig shot and the scumkill got blocked.

Nero could have been a scumkill though.

Nero being shot says nothing about if scum were hunting for a babysitter, even if we assume he's the scumkill. A babysitter can either be used to protect or kill.

VOTE: Chaos

I want to go back here.

In post 1641, Titus wrote:A babysitter can either be used to protect or kill.

This is my point though.

i was pretty sure nero was mafia that was different

VOTE: Andre
I want this

In post 1627, VFP wrote:I think we just go Titus.
Scum killing Nero show either a threat there or setting up Titus more. However, I don't think they target Nero as a protective PR, meaning that this wasn't a consideration when killing and most likely means Titus is lying.

VOTE: Titus

u think titus is mafia babysitter

In post 1627, VFP wrote:However, I don't think they target Nero as a protective PR, meaning that this wasn't a consideration when killing and most likely means Titus is lying

Can you explain what you're saying like I'm an idiot?

You think Titus is lying about being a babysitter enabler because he's scum, meaning the scum team knows he's lying, and therefore don't hunt for a protective role with their kill? If I have that thought process right, what about Nero's slot makes you think scum wouldn't kill there looking for a protective role?

Alternate scenario: what if Titus is town so scum believe his role claim and then kill someone that they think wouldn't protect any of the mafia since that would mean risking a scum death

In post 1644, Rathe wrote:VOTE: petapan

do go on