Mafiascum.net

VOTE: galron
Fork it, I was floundering for reasons to TR him D1 and I know from LN 235 that tends to be a bad sign

In post 1624, Save The Dragons wrote:help i'm drowning under the weight of galron's 0 scum reads

VOTE: Kop. Hi, whos your vote today, has your read on Titus changed?

Galron: yuh sb9 is 100% scum so I won't vote my other scumreads
Then sb9 dies...
Galron: gimme that towncred

In post 1626, HockeyFan wrote:

In post 1624, Save The Dragons wrote:help i'm drowning under the weight of galron's 0 scum reads

VOTE: Kop. Hi, whos your vote today, has your read on Titus changed?

i'm voting galron

titus giving me bad vibes but i think she's one of those people that always give me bad vibes.

In post 1625, Gamma Emerald wrote:VOTE: galron
Fork it, I was floundering for reasons to TR him D1 and I know from LN 235 that tends to be a bad sign

This post is very towny

In post 1628, Save The Dragons wrote:

In post 1626, HockeyFan wrote:

In post 1624, Save The Dragons wrote:help i'm drowning under the weight of galron's 0 scum reads

VOTE: Kop. Hi, whos your vote today, has your read on Titus changed?

i'm voting galron

titus giving me bad vibes but i think she's one of those people that always give me bad vibes.

oh mb, the question wasnt meant to be posed to u(didnt mean to quote the post), but thanks anyways for answering it, can u expand on the Titus SR

vibes

In post 1623, Gamma Emerald wrote:

In post 1618, Galron wrote:

In post 1609, Titus wrote:

In post 1587, Galron wrote:I'm sheeping Titus for now. I'm thinking there's something more than ml involved.

VOTE: T3

Why sheep me when my thoughts are lol redo I dun goofed?

Both your and Gamma's entrance looked like results votes. Gamma later said his was for a different reason, so I went with yours. Now you're telling me yours isn't based on anything mechanical.

UNVOTE:

Tbh I don’t like this

Meh. I've explained it twice. What's wrong with it.

I'm going to reread, and have a rethink.

I obviously thought SB9 was scum, but obviously not the case. Titus, I am still dubious over, but I need to reread over things and reevaluate.

In post 1627, T3 wrote:Galron: yuh sb9 is 100% scum so I won't vote my other scumreads
Then sb9 dies...
Galron: gimme that towncred

scumsb precluded scum salsa. Get it right.

In post 1632, Galron wrote:

In post 1623, Gamma Emerald wrote:

In post 1618, Galron wrote:

In post 1609, Titus wrote:

In post 1587, Galron wrote:I'm sheeping Titus for now. I'm thinking there's something more than ml involved.

VOTE: T3

Why sheep me when my thoughts are lol redo I dun goofed?

Both your and Gamma's entrance looked like results votes. Gamma later said his was for a different reason, so I went with yours. Now you're telling me yours isn't based on anything mechanical.

UNVOTE:

Tbh I don’t like this

Meh. I've explained it twice. What's wrong with it.

Don’t like the way you just went “yeah this looks like a guilty I don’t wanna question it”

In post 1635, Gamma Emerald wrote:

In post 1632, Galron wrote:

In post 1623, Gamma Emerald wrote:

In post 1618, Galron wrote:

In post 1609, Titus wrote:

In post 1587, Galron wrote:I'm sheeping Titus for now. I'm thinking there's something more than ml involved.

VOTE: T3

Why sheep me when my thoughts are lol redo I dun goofed?

Both your and Gamma's entrance looked like results votes. Gamma later said his was for a different reason, so I went with yours. Now you're telling me yours isn't based on anything mechanical.

UNVOTE:

Tbh I don’t like this

Meh. I've explained it twice. What's wrong with it.

Don’t like the way you just went “yeah this looks like a guilty I don’t wanna question it”

Yeah she already hushed me on Day 1 on something I asked, and I thought this may be related.

Galron is a soggy noodle. I could definitely vote a soggy noodle. What is the VC?

In post 1625, Gamma Emerald wrote:VOTE: galron
Fork it, I was floundering for reasons to TR him D1 and I know from LN 235 that tends to be a bad sign

That's E-2.

My vote makes it E-1.

Claim time, tick tock.

The people on this wagon are ppl i like as town but I still dont like the galron wagon itself and idk why. Like I'm down to vote Galron but I really dont want to atm

In post 1635, Gamma Emerald wrote:

In post 1632, Galron wrote:

In post 1623, Gamma Emerald wrote:

In post 1618, Galron wrote:

In post 1609, Titus wrote:

In post 1587, Galron wrote:I'm sheeping Titus for now. I'm thinking there's something more than ml involved.

VOTE: T3

Why sheep me when my thoughts are lol redo I dun goofed?

Both your and Gamma's entrance looked like results votes. Gamma later said his was for a different reason, so I went with yours. Now you're telling me yours isn't based on anything mechanical.

UNVOTE:

Tbh I don’t like this

Meh. I've explained it twice. What's wrong with it.

Don’t like the way you just went “yeah this looks like a guilty I don’t wanna question it”

I agree with this.

In post 1638, DrippingGoofball wrote:

In post 1625, Gamma Emerald wrote:VOTE: galron
Fork it, I was floundering for reasons to TR him D1 and I know from LN 235 that tends to be a bad sign

That's E-2.

My vote makes it E-1.

Claim time, tick tock.

Tick tock.

Odd-night gunsmith. Checked Roden.

In post 1640, Titus wrote:

In post 1635, Gamma Emerald wrote:

In post 1632, Galron wrote:

In post 1623, Gamma Emerald wrote:

In post 1618, Galron wrote:

In post 1609, Titus wrote:

In post 1587, Galron wrote:I'm sheeping Titus for now. I'm thinking there's something more than ml involved.

VOTE: T3

Why sheep me when my thoughts are lol redo I dun goofed?

Both your and Gamma's entrance looked like results votes. Gamma later said his was for a different reason, so I went with yours. Now you're telling me yours isn't based on anything mechanical.

UNVOTE:

Tbh I don’t like this

Meh. I've explained it twice. What's wrong with it.

Don’t like the way you just went “yeah this looks like a guilty I don’t wanna question it”

I agree with this.

But when you don't want to talk about something and I comply, that's it.

I guess I should've pressed the point Day 1 why you were giving T3 a tr but "didn't want to talk about it."

In post 1639, HockeyFan wrote:The people on this wagon are ppl i like as town but I still dont like the galron wagon itself and idk why. Like I'm down to vote Galron but I really dont want to atm

Why not? If you're willing to vote me, why not now?

In post 1644, Galron wrote:

In post 1639, HockeyFan wrote:The people on this wagon are ppl i like as town but I still dont like the galron wagon itself and idk why. Like I'm down to vote Galron but I really dont want to atm

Why not? If you're willing to vote me, why not now?

Town!hockey should be just as willing to hammer someone they think is scum as vote in the middle of the pack.

Why did you check Roden? Also why were you referring to what looked like guiltiest when you are an investigation role yourself? Wouldn’t your natural inclination be to be MORE skeptical about any possible guilties via knowing you yourself are already investigative? This thought process does not track at all IMO

Roden was flexing a PR. I assume there's a vig in the game. I wanted to know if that was Roden.

You think an odd night gunsmith would be the only investigative?

And before anyone gets shitty, yes I know a guilty on Roden would not mean he's a vig necessarily.