Posted: Fri Oct 28, 2022 1:12 am
You = mastina's wagoners, collectivelyIn post 1623, Yume wrote:I, however, do wish that jjh would replace in, so I can go back to the sidelines. Trying to reason with you gives me a headache.
You = mastina's wagoners, collectivelyIn post 1623, Yume wrote:I, however, do wish that jjh would replace in, so I can go back to the sidelines. Trying to reason with you gives me a headache.
what if he replaces in and calls mastina scum?In post 1623, Yume wrote:I, however, do wish that jjh would replace in, so I can go back to the sidelines. Trying to reason with you gives me a headache.
you said you can check 2 specific people and one is mastinaIn post 1621, Yume wrote:Nope, still can check 2 people. Those 2 people may change depending on how the gamestate goes.In post 1620, Enchant wrote:You said you can check 2 people.In post 1617, Yume wrote:About the check? I never did. People just assumed it was a cop check.
Afterwards you denied it, saying you can only check mastina.
It's you putting fact that this check will either "CLEAR" mastina or "NOT CLEAR" mastina.In post 1626, Yume wrote:It's not a cop ability. How many times must I repeat that?
You are all idjits.
Then I follow him. I can read mastina good, but he can read her better.In post 1627, Frozen Angel wrote:what if he replaces in and calls mastina scum?In post 1623, Yume wrote:I, however, do wish that jjh would replace in, so I can go back to the sidelines. Trying to reason with you gives me a headache.
Well, you would find out, won't you? You'll find out one way or another, even if I die.In post 1629, Enchant wrote:It's you putting fact that this check will either "CLEAR" mastina or "NOT CLEAR" mastina.In post 1626, Yume wrote:It's not a cop ability. How many times must I repeat that?
You are all idjits.
So if it's not Cop, then i wonder what it is.
What the fuckIn post 1630, Yume wrote:Then I follow him. I can read mastina good, but he can read her better.In post 1627, Frozen Angel wrote:what if he replaces in and calls mastina scum?In post 1623, Yume wrote:I, however, do wish that jjh would replace in, so I can go back to the sidelines. Trying to reason with you gives me a headache.
P-edit: There are currently two specific people and mastina is one of them, but the ability is not two-shot. It's just that mastina and one other are currently viable targets, because the game would be easier for me and everyone else alike if one or both were town in my eyes.
Possibly, but given that you already sorted both, you would be beating a dead horse.In post 1631, Frozen Angel wrote:and if one or both are scum then it can become a mechanical nightmare for us based on your impression?
if true then sorting those two slots are a priority for us. am I correct?
Oh about the mastina not being worth it thing?In post 313, Bunnyonce wrote:I agree with the bad vibeRadical Ratexpressed earlier aboutprofessorticand I think it's a genuine vibe (80).
I don't really understand the case onT-Bonethough. I feel like he can be scumread for not contributing much to the game. To me, 151 and 152 sound like filler posts. But I do not see the associative read withmastina. Care to explain, @RR?
~Greeting
what do you mean already sorted both. we and you started this day phase without knowing those slots alignment right? and you can check something about them but it wont tell you for certain they are town as the game is multiball you said right?In post 1635, Yume wrote:Possibly, but given that you already sorted both, you would be beating a dead horse.In post 1631, Frozen Angel wrote:and if one or both are scum then it can become a mechanical nightmare for us based on your impression?
if true then sorting those two slots are a priority for us. am I correct?
In post 313, Bunnyonce wrote:I agree with the bad vibeRadical Ratexpressed earlier aboutprofessorticand I think it's a genuine vibe (80).
I don't really understand the case onT-Bonethough. I feel like he can be scumread for not contributing much to the game. To me, 151 and 152 sound like filler posts. But I do not see the associative read withmastina. Care to explain, @RR?
~Greeting
In post 1595, mastina wrote:That'sIn post 1582, MMR wrote:I feel like RR and Bunny haven't interacted that much that could point to them being partnered.exactlywhy they ARE (likely) partnered.
No seriously.
This is a multiball game.
"haven't interacted that much in ways that can point to them being partnered" is exactly what scum in multiball strive for.
Individually, I think both have decent odds for being scum;
Neither of them look like they're not scum with the other;
With neither as being a particular point of pressure, that kind of interaction suggests both scum together. Bunnyonce's vote on RR is fairly halfhearted especially given the wagon on me and no real effort from Bunnyonce to dismantle it. So the RR vote is fairly performative. Bunnyonce wasn't voting RR while there was a more competitive gamestate with multiple wagons, when RR votes had a chance to gain traction. Bunnyonce's vote on RR happened only after my elimination gained enough momentum to become almost an inevitabilitBree.
Well, the majority of the players is convinced that one is scum and the other is town, hence majority has already decided and wouldn't budge regardless of what happens with my check.In post 1637, Frozen Angel wrote:what do you mean already sorted both. we and you started this day phase without knowing those slots alignment right? and you can check something about them but it wont tell you for certain they are town as the game is multiball you said right?In post 1635, Yume wrote:Possibly, but given that you already sorted both, you would be beating a dead horse.In post 1631, Frozen Angel wrote:and if one or both are scum then it can become a mechanical nightmare for us based on your impression?
if true then sorting those two slots are a priority for us. am I correct?
then how will we have them both sorted with the crumbs your putting about these mechanics?
Believe what you want to believe.In post 1641, Radical Rat wrote:Yume, I'm sorry, but you need to full claim, only leaving out the identity of the second person you can apparently check.
Because "A cop that isn't actually a cop and only works specifically on two people but isn't limited shot and also doesn't actually work at all in multiball" is... Really difficult to believe.
And not claiming the precise nature of this "check" isn't helping you, because the dangerous part of the claim (investigative claiming to target a high profile elimination candidate) is already out there.
Otherwise, I'm just gonna have to assume you're making this shit up as you go to protect mastina.
100% agreed here.In post 1636, Radical Rat wrote:Oh about the mastina not being worth it thing?In post 313, Bunnyonce wrote:I agree with the bad vibeRadical Ratexpressed earlier aboutprofessorticand I think it's a genuine vibe (80).
I don't really understand the case onT-Bonethough. I feel like he can be scumread for not contributing much to the game. To me, 151 and 152 sound like filler posts. But I do not see the associative read withmastina. Care to explain, @RR?
~Greeting
Well, at the time it struck me as odd because in the absence of some kind of role information, I didn't see how one scum could be more "worth it" than another. So it looked to me like either partner distancing (expressing a scumread without following through is often a partner thing), or an attempt to look like partner distancing to set up a legacy mislim (seemed a bit too on the nose, but also sometimes scum are just like that).
However, I must admit, with the explosion and mess that this mastina wagon has wrought on the game, now I kinda get what T-Bone was saying. Probably would have been easier and more enjoyable to go after literally anyone else.
But we're here now, and she IS scum