Mafiascum.net

In post 1649, Titus wrote:Lots of wine.

In post 1612, Squirrel Girl wrote:

In post 1594, Jingle wrote:Hey Titus, your bullshit is showing. Also, I wouldn't say that you convinced town not to make you Suicide so much as you shouted things until I gave up on rational t

And your scum misreps are showing too. You're quoting something that isn't a contradiction at all, and are then acting like you have a case closed type situation. The statements from Titus can perfectly coexist, in fact they support each other and make her look like she's being fairly honest and open about how she interacts with theory buddies.

In post 1626, Titus wrote:

In post 1616, Snork wrote:Interesting. Bubba, gm, titus, pants all think I'm scum and yet are not voting for me because "Jingle is a stronger read"? Bullshit. That is so much bullshit. His ISO is townier than mine but this is the better lynch option for scum because flipping me would give town too much info.

Are you saying conftown Pants is lying?

Jingle is scum. Near unanimous. You can be playing like an idiot.

In post 1652, Snork wrote:

good lord SC, rockin the VCs. Are you bored? I think this calls for additional entertainment.

I could claim a power role next if you like. Or maybe serial killer. Mmm yeah I like that idea too.

In post 1657, Guyett wrote:I should be conf town to snork because snork is still alive today....

In post 1013, Jingle wrote: Needs a rope:
Titus-

Spoiler: Titus is Scum!

In post 182, Titus wrote:I agree with Pants. Hammer postponed until after thorough reading which is after work meeting.

In post 183, Titus wrote:Ika y u want hammer so early?

These two are not from the same mindset. The first is fine with a hammer. The second is not.

In post 272, Titus wrote:R, with that piss poor hammer you think that all scum were on your wagon.

SSK hammered as soon as the ika counterwagon picked up steam. There's two explanations for this. The first one which SSK should have claimed with his post if town (and I'm withholding to see if he says it). The second is that SSK is scum with ika and came out of the woodwork to ensure a mislynch and give ika the opportunity to talk himself out of this.

Setting up IKA for SSK's scummy behavior. Making assumptions about SSK's motivation. Tying SSK and IKA together. She also never returned to this 'motivation SSK could claim' and instead tunnel visioned on IKA, ignoring SSK for the entirety of the next day.

In post 281, Titus wrote:Ok, a reread is in order. If scum killed GreyICE, there must have been a reason for it.

The only names I see relevant in checking GreyICE's ISO are Bubba, Burning and Antihero. It's quite a small ISO which works well to send a message, I guess... but what. Seeing interactions with Grey would be more helpful, but that means a reread with the assumption Grey was town.

Ika/SSK are probably scum and this kill is an excellent kill to divert suspicion. But wifom, it's an excellent kill to frame them too. I want to see ika's reaction while I focus on my reread.

VOTE: ika

"Analysis. My Analysis is Worthless! Vote: Not the player I'm suspicious of who just quickhammered!"

In post 290, Titus wrote:It's quite possible a good chunk were on the wagon. However, it is obvious that the scumteam that Reinoe was putting forth was wrong.

That being said Pants, I was looking for a damn good reason for ignoring obvscum behavior and doing what I want isn't it.

This is seeming like the twilight zone game. Y'all are fixated on the cheerleaders while the Gorilla just wanders around in the middle of everything.

VOTE: ika

That last second hammer looked like it was to protect ika. SSK might have drawn short straw to hammer but I want to crack ika today to get certain as to his alignment.

Really, this is getting tedious. I love the fact that you reference the Gorilla (SSK) and still don't vote for him.

In post 412, Titus wrote:God damn it... Site ate my post. I will try again tomorrow

but for ika 211 and 218 are far from fucking passive and you know it. I just am trying to break my death tunnel habit but you make it so fucking hard. I will not tunnel...

My name is Titus and I am a member of Tunnelers Anonymous. I have gone 0 games without tunneling as town....

The last sentence is incredibly manipulative. "Ignore my tunneling because I tunnel as town." You tunnel as both alignments, your defense is null as fuck.

In post 436, Titus wrote:Substance while I didn't define it like a five year old becausse I suppose you have a dictionary means anything that would logically help determine alignment. That definition doesn't change.


Ika, don't act like you never voted on a gambit. BE should have unvoted but the site was sucking. Thst being said, he does need to explain why Pants and Snork is TvT in yhe next post.

Goodmorning, please do something other than buddy me.

Goodmorning stop buddying me. I'm not going to scumread you for it, but stop doing it. Seriously, where is the paranoia? Where is the town suspicion? Why do you just dismiss GM here? It's posts like this that make me think Titus and GM are a scumteam.

In post 968, Titus wrote:

In post 935, Antihero wrote:i'm playing with a bunch of people who should know me pretty well, but then cram their heads up their asses and act like they don't know me at all.

This is precisely how I feel about Jingle's read on me. He has Geology trip and Upick - Suicide bomber and still gets it wrong...why?

First, I was semi right. We've played a couple of marathons together. Second, how the fuck should I know you well enough to meta read you off of a game where I confbiased my way to a loss with you scum and a game where I replaced into scum after you replaced into conftown. This seriously needs the rope.

In post 998, Titus wrote:

In post 973, Antihero wrote:

In post 971, MafiaSSK wrote:Hi. Ika's scum now.
VOTE: ika

...alright, i'm cool with killing this now.

*gulp* I agree with this and that scares me.

VOTE: SSK

Seriously? You're afraid that your 'scumread' is voting obvscum? I know you're familiar with this concept called bussing. It's not a new thing.

SSK- I don't think I need to explain this. He's scum, and caught.

In post 1660, Snork wrote:Guyett, what are you thinking here? With the info that we currently have, do you think bubba is scum just because of the placement on the wagon? Or is there something else?

Also, thoughts on the Jingle wagon - have you had a chance to ISO HighShroomish at all? I'm extremely paranoid about .. well several people. Particularly, paranoid that Jingle is town and that Anti may not be. My reads have also been particularly shit lately and it's pissing me off. What do you think?

In post 1663, Guyett wrote:

In post 1660, Snork wrote:Guyett, what are you thinking here? With the info that we currently have, do you think bubba is scum just because of the placement on the wagon? Or is there something else?

Also, thoughts on the Jingle wagon - have you had a chance to ISO HighShroomish at all? I'm extremely paranoid about .. well several people. Particularly, paranoid that Jingle is town and that Anti may not be. My reads have also been particularly shit lately and it's pissing me off. What do you think?

He ran faith plus one... He should reread that game.

Jingle may be scum, I want to look at that wagon and the gm wagon.


There has to be at least 1 scum within {SG, Jingle and Bubba}, maybe even 2.

I don't like the way bubba is seeing scum in everything I've been doing when all I've done is troll a lot, disagree with the SSK wagon, lolhammer SSK and not let the Jingle lynch happen in like a fucking page.

In post 1668, Guyett wrote:Don't think I got lynched in F+1

In post 1670, Dr Pants wrote:snork, no offense meant here, but you put a lot of faith in your ability to meta read people. Is this how you typically read people? Because one thing I'm noticing, all the people you are familiar with are in your town reads, and the rational behind it is their meta.

In post 1665, Guyett wrote:What was I like in faith +1 then?