Mafiascum.net

Can we count the number of times that mollie has used the word "vig"? Why are you trying to set up plans for the night? That's pretty sketch.

hey star do you have anything else to say about the rest of the gamestate that cld move it along?

cos that wld be a novelty.

otherwise we can count the number of times you have mentioned me all day. I bet it is far more than how many times I have used the word "vig".

I have had plenty to say. My ISO concentrates on more than just you.

Do you know that we haven't heard from MattP since Monday? Has he been prodded at all?

↑ MattP wrote:

↑ Spiffeh wrote:mollie come back to the MattP wagon I think he is trying to lurk his way out of being a lynch possibility.

I'm having trouble remaining engaged. If you have questions for me, please ask.

Also....seeing this.....

↑ MattP wrote:

↑ notscience wrote:Matt feels underwhelming here in comparison to how he felt in Disney.

I've been skimming and I intend to be more substantive tomorrow and just generally more as the game slows down, but I'm in medical school now and I'm never going to be available to provide a level of content similar to my older play.

Makes me wonder why he replaced in at all.

I was reading through his ISO yesterday, and while he's been clearly absent. He has contributed a case, and some decent insight, imho. Within his ISO, and something that I noted within my own posts, he mentions how aggressive Flameaxe was being when I simply asked a question towards him, amongst other instances. I don't disagree with him. He has some really good points about Flameaxe that should be considered.

Before he left he switched his vote to AJ, when it was AJ vs Davsto for votes. Just prior, he says...

↑ MattP wrote:I would vote Aj over Davsto. I think Davsto's narrative for his disinterest in the game is genuine, whereas Aj is actively avoiding contribution to most aspects of the games but providing disingenuous and over-defensive reasoning for doing so.

His views, at least on Davsto, basically align with my own. AJ is someone I need to read through, but that slot is in the midst of replacement as well, right?


In any case, I'm not impressed with this wagon and I think the BroChat Alliance should seriously consider someone else.

↑ Starbuck wrote:I have had plenty to say. My ISO concentrates on more than just you.

how about you do a succinct recap in case anyone missed it.

cos i cannot remember a single thing you have said outside of that and I wld really love to hear your thoughts.

that are not about how much you dislike me. cos I think you covered that.

eta: yaye! you are doing something.

If you just read my posts when I caught up, you can ISO just as easily.

And, fyi, I have been doing things. Just because you're not paying attention doesn't mean that I'm not doing things.

yeah most of it is about mollie. and how much you dislike me.

VOTE: matty

↑ Starbuck wrote:And, fyi, I have been doing things. Just because you're not paying attention doesn't mean that I'm not doing things.

you are not doing shit unless it is in a scum pt

↑ pirate mollie wrote:yeah most of it is about mollie. and how much you dislike me.

True, but before you attack others for what's in their ISOs, maybe you should look at your own. You know because people you live in glass houses shouldn't throw stones.

Also, blatant lies are blatant lies. I'm sure that you're a lovely person. I just dislike your gameplay and how you're treating people within this game. I can separate that from who you might be on the other side of the monitor.

↑ pirate mollie wrote:

↑ Starbuck wrote:And, fyi, I have been doing things. Just because you're not paying attention doesn't mean that I'm not doing things.

you are not doing shit unless it is in a scum pt

Well, you would know. How are things going over there?

↑ Starbuck wrote:

↑ curiouskarmadog wrote:

↑ pirate mollie wrote:
I am very much against a notty wagon and will actively speak against it.

Did you know the sky is blue?

^ posts like these are nothing except to try to shame me and make me feel bad about myself?

cos I was defending a town read?

also why are you offering up matty but not voting him?

you are so feeding dat shit

↑ pirate mollie wrote:

↑ Starbuck wrote:

↑ curiouskarmadog wrote:

↑ pirate mollie wrote:
I am very much against a notty wagon and will actively speak against it.

Did you know the sky is blue?

^ posts like these are nothing except to try to shame me and make me feel bad about myself?

cos I was defending a town read?

also why are you offering up matty but not voting him?

you are so feeding dat shit

What? I was commenting on the fact that I already knew that you wouldn't stand for a notscience wagon. It's damn obvious, just like the sky is blue.

And I'm not offering up MattP or feeding anything. Did you not read that entire post? Reading comprehension is totally ftw.

are you still vote parking on me?

while acting like you are somehow superior to me?

and paying attention to the game?

I'm happy with my vote still. This whole alluding that I'm in the scum PT, still not reading my posts thoroughly, and trying to make me look bad because of it, hasn't sat well with me. It's part of why I haven't moved my vote. I don't feel that to be a very town action. Other people that I semi-trust see you as town, and I'm okay to trust their reads for now, but man, you've gotta help yourself at some point.

I haven't acted at all superior to you. I've been frustrated and annoyed by how obtuse you have been, how much you've tried to twist my words around, and the fact that you STILL aren't reading through my posts. Was the olive branch just for show? Or what? Maybe instead of coming at me with this nastiness and hostility, you could have conversation. For example, if you read through that one on MattP, you wouldn't have made the accusation that you did a few posts up.

Right now, when you're not distracting me from doing so, I'm trying to look through the ISOs and cases against those top 3 wagons. I surely don't want to end up with a no lynch today because that garners us no information, but I won't be voting for someone all willy nilly just to make sure that we have one.

pls

↑ Starbuck wrote:I'm happy with my vote still. This whole alluding that I'm in the scum PT, still not reading my posts thoroughly, and trying to make me look bad because of it, hasn't sat well with me. It's part of why I haven't moved my vote. I don't feel that to be a very town action. Other people that I semi-trust see you as town, and I'm okay to trust their reads for now, but man, you've gotta help yourself at some point.

I haven't acted at all superior to you. I've been frustrated and annoyed by how obtuse you have been, how much you've tried to twist my words around, and the fact that you STILL aren't reading through my posts. Was the olive branch just for show? Or what? Maybe instead of coming at me with this nastiness and hostility, you could have conversation. For example, if you read through that one on MattP, you wouldn't have made the accusation that you did a few posts up.

Right now, when you're not distracting me from doing so, I'm trying to look through the ISOs and cases against those top 3 wagons. I surely don't want to end up with a no lynch today because that garners us no information, but I won't be voting for someone all willy nilly just to make sure that we have one.

I am reading your posts. every single 1 of them.

there are a lot of snarky potshots aimed at me in there.

can "obtuse" be the new buzzword.

what you are doing to matty is what I did to cephrir. also

but I won't be voting for someone all willy nilly just to make sure that we have one

oh okay! I mean your vote on me that you are parking isn't willy nilly at all and you must be thinking a whole lot about it!

I've always been one for psychological tells and Starbuck here has the knows more/is better attitude that generally goes with informed minority. And the sarcasm is p bad too. Liking mollie more from the exchange. Potentially theater but not going to speculate on that for the moment. Star goes in to null scum pile.

@Star: What part of talking about mollie's talk of a vig is sitting badly with you. It's a role that mollie likes and with the chit chat about it allows her to have a say in how any theoretical vig plays in the night. It impacts night play when otherwise she might not be able to and there is no scum motivation I can see for talking about it. It can even put scum in weird positions where by weird calls makes them keen to not double shoot on someone or other scenarios. The focus from you on it much more offputting.

For the record, some other points to help peeps work out where I am sitting. I like Bins' tone. It feels right for how she is describing her state in terms of the game.

Something about notty's trust in people who are reading him favorably is sitting badly with me. Feels like buddying without it meaning to look like buddying. Mostly a gut iffyness though.

It isn't willy nilly. That's why I haven't moved it yet.

Who is Cephrir? And why is this comparable?

I don't feel the MattP wagon has a strong case, other than his absence. I didn't feel the same scumminess that you all felt about SC, and even read through Spiffeh's superb case. I could end up being completely wrong on that, and then we'll waste a day lynching my lowly VT self because you're gonna go balls to the wall on a case of how I was reluctant to lynch the slot if it flips scum. I can already see how tomorrow will play out if I don't vote Matt and he flips scum, but if I'm right and he flips town, there's a number of people on that lynch that we can look at.

Posturing of relational tells for matt noted should matt be flipped and flip scum.

espy are you buddying me cos i am getting freaking paranoid.

I am reading my recent posts to star and you know what? I haven't been nasty.

star if you were interested in isoing pple you cld have spent your time doing that instead of taking a potshot at me cos I don't want to lynch notty.

like srsly you had all weekend and put forth chimers but nothing that even remotely looks like scumhunting.

I don't suppose that I will get my way and have a star lynch today huh

↑ Espeonage wrote:I've always been one for psychological tells and Starbuck here has the knows more/is better attitude that generally goes with informed minority. And the sarcasm is p bad too. Liking mollie more from the exchange. Potentially theater but not going to speculate on that for the moment. Star goes in to null scum pile.

@Star: What part of talking about mollie's talk of a vig is sitting badly with you. It's a role that mollie likes and with the chit chat about it allows her to have a say in how any theoretical vig plays in the night. It impacts night play when otherwise she might not be able to and there is no scum motivation I can see for talking about it. It can even put scum in weird positions where by weird calls makes them keen to not double shoot on someone or other scenarios. The focus from you on it much more offputting.

Psychological tells? Is that a real thing now? I'm not quite sure how I have a "knows more/is better" attitude. I know just as much as Jon Snow knows.

I have been sarcastic, that is true. However, given the amount of pure BS that I've had to deal with from mollie in just this one day, that truly has nothing to do with gameplay, you might have to take it all with a grain of salt, too.


It's not sitting bad with me. I just find it to be odd to be constantly asking to be vigged or nk'd. If she's town, it's essentially playing against her win condition and instead of having some actual conversation, there's a ton of posts of hers asking to be killed. It just doesn't make sense.

↑ pirate mollie wrote:like srsly you had all weekend and put forth chimers but nothing that even remotely looks like scumhunting.

I don't suppose that I will get my way and have a star lynch today huh

this was to star!