1st Uhm no? That was about me as well and how I'm obviously town.
2nd No one pays attention to what I've done in the slot. This one is mostly titus though.
3rd I can't answer for titus but *question*. How is that about titus?
4th Answer my fucking question.
5th Not really "about" but fair enough.
6th what? That is me calling massive's logic out saying that we were townie but then one thing automagically makes us scum. That is hardly about titus.
Posted: Thu Apr 28, 2016 1:47 pm
by Night Hunters
↑SirCakez wrote:Most of your stuff relates to Titus though
also those were literally just the last like page. Read any of my stuff from like any other day?
Posted: Thu Apr 28, 2016 1:51 pm
by Night Hunters
Spoiler: ton of posts that arent about titus, stopped after post 549 cause it was already long enough
↑Night Hunters wrote:Fire, why are you pulling completely incorrect meta of me out of your ass?
-Dad
You are normally very opinionated this early in games?
Not all the time, it is mostly 50-50, and in ny 192 I was so??
-Dad
↑Night Hunters wrote:You need to get a good education, son.
-Dad
↑Night Hunters wrote:Titus and I are in almost 100% agreement over our reads. Reasons might be a little different but meh.
↑Night Hunters wrote:We have been trying not to clutter the thread because we both generally post a butt ton.
-Dad
↑Night Hunters wrote:If this firebringer v bbt becomes a thing I'm taking BBT's side.
-Dad
↑Night Hunters wrote:Oh I thought that pr claim was a joke
I'm taking no sides, then.
-Dad
↑Night Hunters wrote:I didnt think someone would claim PR at the slightest sign of pressure.
Seems reckless
-Dad
↑Night Hunters wrote:Gotcha
So I suppose your read of sc is genuine, then, I don't think you do this as scum. Do you have any reasons or is it still gut?
-Dad
↑Night Hunters wrote:Titus and I agreed that sc's sudden town read of us was scummy. My gut pinged it and titus agreed so I'm about 90% sure we're right here.
↑ɀefiend wrote:Would you mind providing your top scum-read so far with reasons? Your vote is currently sitting on a claimed PR and I think everyone would appreciate some more meaningful content from you.
No one's convinced me to move my vote. Certainly not Firebringer with his PR claim two posts after saying no one was ever going to NK him.
↑Night Hunters wrote:Titus likes the GL wagon, I think it is decent. And idk? We were just talking about them.
Titus said a while back they could do jeanne but I'm null on that slot.
↑Thor665 wrote:Was my tone not off when you asked me to back your wagon of choice? Like, if you suspected him, and I'm a scummy seeming person who also suspects him shouldn't that positively affect your read on him or on me? Instead you seemed to suspect both, but only after I turned you down (something I made quite clear that I would prior to your ask, unless you thought me mentioning Cake's scummy posting was equivalent to the level of fervor I expressed towards my Fire read). I'm asking because the logic flow here seems really off, I don't ask people I think are scummy to back me up in lyching someone - do you?
If yes, why?
In no...then what happened here?
Your entire question is asking me why I changed my position on you when that was titus' position. You're saying "was my tone not off when you asked me to back your wagon of choice" that was titus who asked you that. Not me. So your question is completely unrelated to me. *shrugs*
But cakes do you have any reason to think we are scum other than weird night interactions?
Posted: Fri Apr 29, 2016 1:30 am
by SirCakez
↑SirCakez wrote:The deathtunnel Titus had on me for much of day 1 and now for today as well doesn't feel like her towngame. I think she'd be more open and not using terrible reasoning like "faked his reads" as town.
I answered that already
Posted: Fri Apr 29, 2016 1:39 am
by Night Hunters
yea ik. The question.was from post 1640 I think
Posted: Fri Apr 29, 2016 1:40 am
by Night Hunters
1635 close enough
Posted: Fri Apr 29, 2016 1:44 am
by Night Hunters
But my point is youve had the ability to analyze my posts and get a read on me and yet no one has brought up my head in the read of this slot (and titus is considered to have a scummy playstyle) and so I think when people ignore.my posts they are eithet conf biasing hard or attempting to.mislynch us. An objective read of.our slot will make it.p.clear we are town
Posted: Fri Apr 29, 2016 1:48 am
by SirCakez
I don't think Titus has a scummy playstyle.
I'm not ignoring your posts, there's just nothing especially townie or scummy coming from you compared to Titus.
Posted: Fri Apr 29, 2016 2:36 am
by Night Hunters
People said day one we were scum because I wasnt leading the slot because they thought titus' playstyle was scummy and therefore I should be leading. gonna go try to find that
↑Firebringer wrote:Night Hunters is sure scummy IMO.
Wonder if anyone is going to call them out on it besides me.
Nice. Talk to me about this (my one and only reach out to you. Blow me off with some sarcastic bullshit and I promise you I will lynch you D1 even if someone outright claims scum.)
↑Night Hunters wrote:@BBT, Does GL's push to attack the suggestion that Fire and SirCakez could be scum together while refusing to address the trajectory issue look bad or am I just wanting to scumread everyone who defends Cakez at the moment? He says my scumread is forced, I lay it out there and GL doesn't say anything about it. He's complaining rather about the methods I am using to "oversell" my scumread, which is a thinly veiled discredit rather than a substantive response.
Titus, I really dislike your push on SC, like a lot. SC's posting has also been pretty decent over the past couple of pages and I'm concerned you haven't addressed this. I also agree with whoever said that SC has too many people pushing him, it's nothing solid, but it's enough to give me pause about his wagon alongside his recent posting.
I am also concerned that you are the main poster for your hydra (Has Dwlee produced any content yet?) I know for a fact you would take over if you rolled scum and I'm sure Dwlee would take over if you're town because I know you believe your general play-style is perceived as scummy so talk to me about this please.
↑tojam2 wrote:The cakey wagon has kind of died out, a lot of you want either a Fire policy lynch or a Gl scum lynch, and seen as he voted for me basically for agreeing with someone else:
VOTE: GL
I don't even have words for this post...Like, lynch-bait or just bad scum? Jesus Christ.
↑massive wrote:
What's the criteria here? Why is SirCakez the "early wagon on town" but I wasn't?
Really massive? Just this, that's all you deemed as important enough to respond to?
VOTE: massive
Posted: Fri Apr 29, 2016 2:55 am
by Night Hunters
i guess that's just one persons opinion, but I think it's pretty true about titus' playstyle.
↑SirCakez wrote:I don't think Titus has a scummy playstyle.
I'm not ignoring your posts, there's just nothing especially townie or scummy coming from you compared to Titus.
You're full of crap. Unless you aren't reading the game there is no way you think my play has been null.
Posted: Fri Apr 29, 2016 2:56 am
by Night Hunters
Sircakez, you seem to be genuine with your posts but I swear you're full of crap.
Posted: Fri Apr 29, 2016 2:59 am
by Night Hunters
Gutreads: Massive/GL is the scum team.
Logic Reads: Massive or GL (most likely gl) and then Cakez is the scum team
Posted: Fri Apr 29, 2016 5:59 am
by ɀefiend
Titus please come in here and answer everything that dwlee has skirted to you.
Posted: Fri Apr 29, 2016 6:38 am
by Titus
↑ɀefiend wrote:Titus please come in here and answer everything that dwlee has skirted to you.
What has Dwlee "skirted" to me? I kinda thought the thread was dead given we hadn't linked up on Skype. Post numbers are fine.
↑Night Hunters wrote:So some things we've been thinking..
Ari gets lynched a hell of a lot faster if GL is scum
cakez being scum
This also needs to be explained.
^ these titus.
It's the day where Ari and GL were wagoned. If GL is scum, Ari needs to be the lynch. Why was there so much stalling in that case? There was a perfect reason to lynch Ari as he was semi-proven not town. Why would scum dicker around unless from the Scum's perspective either lynch was OK?
Posted: Fri Apr 29, 2016 7:26 am
by Night Hunters
Trying to.iso aero and get the vote.counts is crashing.my brower,I will look when I get home
Posted: Fri Apr 29, 2016 9:45 am
by SirCakez
BBT is dead town....
If anything that's another thing that points to you two being scum.
And yes I think your play is null here Dwlee.
Posted: Fri Apr 29, 2016 9:53 am
by Night Hunters
i was showing that people think titus has a scummy playstyle. Now despite me leading the slot no one wants to analyze my posts. And no, my play is not null.
ALSO bbt was townreading us iirc
Posted: Fri Apr 29, 2016 10:24 am
by Night Hunters
VOTE: Cakey
Dwlee and I agree on this. Based on my own mental rules for lylo, Cakey is 100% scum. Scum vote first in lylo in one if two conditions 1) They are confident they win or 2) mechanically boxed in.
Dwlee and I disagree on Cakey's partner but we both agree Cakey is scum based on this rule.
