Posted: Mon Jun 27, 2016 2:42 pm
From one mislynch to another. You guys are fucking great.
I will now take my leave.
I will now take my leave.
https://forum.mafiascum-staging.net/
That's not analyzing WHY they killed who they killed, which is what I read when you said "tell US what they fear."In post 1647, Titus wrote:Really? Scum shooting one mason and confirming the other is wifom? Like shit.In post 1638, podoboq wrote:Analyzing why mafia targeted who they targeted at night is ALWAYS wifom in my experience.In post 1632, Titus wrote:Scum have to shoot and tell US what they fear. They tell us about associatives.
You could try meeting me half way and talk about lynching people I am willing to lynch.In post 1650, Zachstralkita wrote:From one mislynch to another. You guys are fucking great.
I will now take my leave.
Do not presume you're cleared.In post 1631, Zachstralkita wrote:LMFAO he thinks I'm actually mafia ^
You're about displaying what I am feeling 50 pages ago.In post 1654, implosion wrote:Like this whole game is just fucking full of arrogance and it's the biggest thing that's pissing me off. Everyone thinks their reads are better than everyone else's and no one is willing to compromise on anything because of that.
Maybe.In post 1653, Dunnstral wrote:Can you case implosion when you get home
I noticed. I'd be happy to wagon him instead.In post 1655, Dunnstral wrote:Hey guys.........................
If you didn't notice, Zach unvoted me
NoIn post 1661, podoboq wrote:I noticed. I'd be happy to wagon him instead.In post 1655, Dunnstral wrote:Hey guys.........................
If you didn't notice, Zach unvoted me
No maybe I'm genuinely curious on this oneIn post 1660, Transcend wrote:Maybe.In post 1653, Dunnstral wrote:Can you case implosion when you get home
Transcend wrote:Pretty sure implosion is mafia and nos was right about him
Wake88 wrote:Do not presume you're cleared.In post 1631, Zachstralkita wrote:LMFAO he thinks I'm actually mafia ^
In post 1662, Dunnstral wrote:NoIn post 1661, podoboq wrote:I noticed. I'd be happy to wagon him instead.In post 1655, Dunnstral wrote:Hey guys.........................
If you didn't notice, Zach unvoted me
On what do you intend to compromise, then?
No. We aren't doing petty vindictive shit. If you want to wagon him, something other than he was fakeclaiming to get someone lynched since he owned up to it before Dunn reached L minus 1.In post 1661, podoboq wrote:I noticed. I'd be happy to wagon him instead.In post 1655, Dunnstral wrote:Hey guys.........................
If you didn't notice, Zach unvoted me
You should know there are multiple lurkers here.
You're somewhat guilty of this too. But you're trying to compromise so I can't really complain.In post 1659, Titus wrote:You're about displaying what I am feeling 50 pages ago.In post 1654, implosion wrote:Like this whole game is just fucking full of arrogance and it's the biggest thing that's pissing me off. Everyone thinks their reads are better than everyone else's and no one is willing to compromise on anything because of that.
Context, lurker scum.
Can you case Implosion?In post 1664, Zachstralkita wrote:If you vote implosion I will be your puppet
Maybe I'm misreading this, but Zach hasn't owned up to anything.In post 1666, Titus wrote:If you want to wagon him, something other than he was fakeclaiming to get someone lynched since he owned up to it before Dunn reached L minus 1.
I meant the lurker that was being talked about